scholarly journals Identification of key differentially expressed genes between ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer and ER-negative/ HER2-negative breast cancer using integrated bioinformatics analysis

Gland Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 661-675
Author(s):  
Siyuan Gan ◽  
Haixia Dai ◽  
Rujia Li ◽  
Wang Liu ◽  
Ruifang Ye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Differentially Expressed Genes ◽  
Bioinformatics Analysis ◽  
Differentially Expressed ◽  
Er Positive

scholarly journals Key Genes and Prognostic Analysis in HER2+ Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153303382098329
Author(s):  
Yujie Weng ◽  
Wei Liang ◽  
Yucheng Ji ◽  
Zhongxian Li ◽  
Rong Jia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Differentially Expressed Genes ◽  
Protein Interaction ◽  
Differentially Expressed ◽  
Protein Kinase Activity ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
Key Genes

Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)+ breast cancer is considered the most dangerous type of breast cancers. Herein, we used bioinformatics methods to identify potential key genes in HER2+ breast cancer to enable its diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis prediction. Datasets of HER2+ breast cancer and normal tissue samples retrieved from Gene Expression Omnibus and The Cancer Genome Atlas databases were subjected to analysis for differentially expressed genes using R software. The identified differentially expressed genes were subjected to gene ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses followed by construction of protein-protein interaction networks using the STRING database to identify key genes. The genes were further validated via survival and differential gene expression analyses. We identified 97 upregulated and 106 downregulated genes that were primarily associated with processes such as mitosis, protein kinase activity, cell cycle, and the p53 signaling pathway. Visualization of the protein-protein interaction network identified 10 key genes ( CCNA2, CDK1, CDC20, CCNB1, DLGAP5, AURKA, BUB1B, RRM2, TPX2, and MAD2L1), all of which were upregulated. Survival analysis using PROGgeneV2 showed that CDC20, CCNA2, DLGAP5, RRM2, and TPX2 are prognosis-related key genes in HER2+ breast cancer. A nomogram showed that high expression of RRM2, DLGAP5, and TPX2 was positively associated with the risk of death. TPX2, which has not previously been reported in HER2+ breast cancer, was associated with breast cancer development, progression, and prognosis and is therefore a potential key gene. It is hoped that this study can provide a new method for the diagnosis and treatment of HER2 + breast cancer.

scholarly journals The role of ferroptosis in breast cancer patients: a comprehensive analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeng-Hong Wu ◽  
Yun Tang ◽  
Hong Yu ◽  
Hua-Dong Li
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Signaling Pathway ◽  
Differentially Expressed Genes ◽  
Function Analysis ◽  
Cancer Prognosis ◽  
Differentially Expressed ◽  
Immune Checkpoints ◽  
Cell Functions

AbstractBreast cancer (BC) affects the breast tissue and is the second most common cause of mortalities among women. Ferroptosis is an iron-dependent cell death mode that is characterized by intracellular accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). We constructed a prognostic multigene signature based on ferroptosis-associated differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Moreover, we comprehensively analyzed the role of ferroptosis-associated miRNAs, lncRNAs, and immune responses. A total of 259 ferroptosis-related genes were extracted. KEGG function analysis of these genes revealed that they were mainly enriched in the HIF-1 signaling pathway, NOD-like receptor signaling pathway, central carbon metabolism in cancer, and PPAR signaling pathway. Fifteen differentially expressed genes (ALOX15, ALOX15B, ANO6, BRD4, CISD1, DRD5, FLT3, G6PD, IFNG, NGB, NOS2, PROM2, SLC1A4, SLC38A1, and TP63) were selected as independent prognostic factors for BC patients. Moreover, T cell functions, including the CCR score, immune checkpoint, cytolytic activity, HLA, inflammation promotion, para-inflammation, T cell co-stimulation, T cell co-inhibition, and type II INF responses were significantly different between the low-risk and high-risk groups of the TCGA cohort. Immune checkpoints between the two groups revealed that the expressions of PDCD-1 (PD-1), CTLA4, LAG3, TNFSF4/14, TNFRSF4/8/9/14/18/25, and IDO1/2 among others were significantly different. A total of 1185 ferroptosis-related lncRNAs and 219 ferroptosis-related miRNAs were also included in this study. From the online database, we identified novel ferroptosis-related biomarkers for breast cancer prognosis. The findings of this study provide new insights into the development of new reliable and accurate cancer treatment options.

scholarly journals Identification of key genes unique to the luminal A and basal-like breast cancer subtypes via bioinformatic analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rong Jia ◽  
Zhongxian Li ◽  
Wei Liang ◽  
Yucheng Ji ◽  
Yujie Weng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Differentially Expressed Genes ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Breast Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Differentially Expressed ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Basal Like Breast Cancer

Abstract Background Breast cancer subtypes are statistically associated with prognosis. The search for markers of breast tumor heterogeneity and the development of precision medicine for patients are the current focuses of the field. Methods We used a bioinformatic approach to identify key disease-causing genes unique to the luminal A and basal-like subtypes of breast cancer. First, we retrieved gene expression data for luminal A breast cancer, basal-like breast cancer, and normal breast tissue samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. The differentially expressed genes unique to the 2 breast cancer subtypes were identified and subjected to Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses. We constructed protein–protein interaction networks of the differentially expressed genes. Finally, we analyzed the key modules of the networks, which we combined with survival data to identify the unique cancer genes associated with each breast cancer subtype. Results We identified 1,114 differentially expressed genes in luminal A breast cancer and 1,042 differentially expressed genes in basal-like breast cancer, of which the subtypes shared 500. We observed 614 and 542 differentially expressed genes unique to luminal A and basal-like breast cancer, respectively. Through enrichment analyses, protein–protein interaction network analysis, and module mining, we identified 8 key differentially expressed genes unique to each subtype. Analysis of the gene expression data in the context of the survival data revealed that high expression of NMUR1 and NCAM1 in luminal A breast cancer statistically correlated with poor prognosis, whereas the low expression levels of CDC7 , KIF18A , STIL , and CKS2 in basal-like breast cancer statistically correlated with poor prognosis. Conclusions NMUR1 and NCAM1 are novel key disease-causing genes for luminal A breast cancer, and STIL is a novel key disease-causing gene for basal-like breast cancer. These genes are potential targets for clinical treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document