Routine molecular point-of-care testing for respiratory viruses in adults presenting to hospital with acute respiratory illness

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
John P. Hays
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 889-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lili Jiang ◽  
Allison McGeer ◽  
Shelly McNeil ◽  
Kevin Katz ◽  
Mark Loeb ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground:Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk of acquiring and transmitting respiratory viruses while working in healthcare settings.Objectives:To investigate the incidence of and factors associated with HCWs working during an acute respiratory illness (ARI).Methods:HCWs from 9 Canadian hospitals were prospectively enrolled in active surveillance for ARI during the 2010–2011 to 2013–2014 influenza seasons. Daily illness diaries during ARI episodes collected information on symptoms and work attendance.Results:At least 1 ARI episode was reported by 50.4% of participants each study season. Overall, 94.6% of ill individuals reported working at least 1 day while symptomatic, resulting in an estimated 1.9 days of working while symptomatic and 0.5 days of absence during an ARI per participant season. In multivariable analysis, the adjusted relative risk of working while symptomatic was higher for physicians and lower for nurses relative to other HCWs. Participants were more likely to work if symptoms were less severe and on the illness onset date compared to subsequent days. The most cited reason for working while symptomatic was that symptoms were mild and the HCW felt well enough to work (67%). Participants were more likely to state that they could not afford to stay home if they did not have paid sick leave and were younger.Conclusions:HCWs worked during most episodes of ARI, most often because their symptoms were mild. Further data are needed to understand how best to balance the costs and risks of absenteeism versus those associated with working while ill.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e031674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Beard ◽  
Nathan Brendish ◽  
Ahalya Malachira ◽  
Samuel Mills ◽  
Cathleen Chan ◽  
...  

BackgroundInfluenza infections often remain undiagnosed in patients admitted to hospital due to lack of routine testing. When tested for, the diagnosis and treatment of influenza are often delayed due to the slow turnaround times of centralised laboratory PCR testing. Newer molecular systems, have comparable accuracy to laboratory PCR testing, and can generate a result in under 1 hour, making them potentially deployable as point-of-care tests (POCTs). High-quality evidence for the impact of routine POCT for influenza on clinical outcomes is, however, currently lacking. This large pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial aims to address this evidence gap.Methods and analysisThe FluPOC trial is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial evaluating adults admitted to a large teaching hospital and a district general hospital with an acute respiratory illness, during influenza season and defined by Public Health England. Up to 840 patients will be recruited over up to three influenza seasons, and randomised (1:1) to receive either POCT using the FilmArray respiratory panel, or routine clinical care. Clinical and infection control teams will be informed of the results in real time and where influenza is detected clinical teams will be encouraged to offer neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI) treatment in accordance with national guidelines. Those allocated to standard clinical care will have a swab taken for later analysis to allow assessment of missed diagnoses. The outcomes assessment will be by retrospective case note analysis. The outcome measures include the proportion of influenza-positive patients detected and appropriately treated with NAIs, isolation facility use, antibiotic use, length of hospital stay, complications and mortality.Ethics and disseminationPrior to commencing the study, approval was obtained from the South Central Hampshire A Ethics Committee (reference 17/SC/0368, granted 7 September 2017). Results generated from this protocol will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at national and international conferences.Trial registration numberISRCTN17197293


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S988-S988
Author(s):  
Tristan William Clark ◽  
Samuel Mills ◽  
Nathan Brendish

Abstract Background The ResPOC study demonstrated that syndromic molecular point-of-care testing (POCT) for respiratory viruses was associated with earlier discontinuation of unnecessary antibiotics. Subgroup analysis suggests this occurs predominantly in patients with exacerbation of airways disease. Molecular POCT use is becoming widespread but there is a lack of evidence to inform the choice between multiplex syndromic panels vs. uniplex tests for influenza. Methods We evaluated patients with exacerbation of asthma or COPD who were treated with antibiotics. The duration of antibiotics and proportion with early discontinuation were compared between patients testing positive for viruses by POCT (FilmArray Respiratory Panel) those testing negative by POCT and controls. Patients testing positive for viruses by POCT were compared according to virus types detected. Survival curves were generated for duration of antibiotics and compared using the log-rank test. Results There were 118 patient with exacerbation of airways disease in the POCT group who received antibiotics and 111 in the controls. In the POCT group 49/118 (42%) patients tested positive for viruses. Of those testing positive for viruses by POCT 17/49 (35%) had early discontinuation of antibiotics vs. 9/81 (13%) in those testing negative and 7/111 (6%) in controls, P < 0.0001. Survival curve analysis showed a reduced time to antibiotic discontinuation in those testing positive for viruses, P = 0.034. Of those positive for viruses by POCT 20% were positive for influenza, 43% for rhinovirus and 37% for other viruses combined. The proportion with early discontinuation of antibiotics was not different between the virus types, P = 0.53. Conclusion Syndromic molecular POCT for viruses in adults with exacerbation of airways disease leads to early discontinuation in those positive for viruses. As most viruses detected were non-influenza viruses and there was no difference in antibiotic use between virus types, syndromic molecular POCT for respiratory viruses should be favored over uniplex POCT for influenza. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 501-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan J. Brendish ◽  
Hannah F. Schiff ◽  
Tristan W. Clark

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document