scholarly journals AB076. P048. Microsatellite instability and tumor volume inversely affect early progression free survival in adjuvant setting of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: lights and shadows of molecular pathology and immunotherapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. AB076-AB076
Author(s):  
Matteo Palmeri ◽  
Niccola Funel ◽  
Luca Pollina ◽  
Gregorio Di Franci ◽  
Simone Guadagni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Molecular Pathology ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Adjuvant Setting ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Early Progression

KOC (K homology domain containing protein overexpressed in cancer) overexpression and progression-free survival after curative intent resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 48-48
Author(s):  
Benny Johnson ◽  
Maged F. Khalil ◽  
Fan Lin ◽  
Shaobo Zhu ◽  
Lester Kirchner
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Free Survival

48 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States. Unfortunately, effective screening and early detection mechanisms are currently unavailable, thereby 80% of patients present with distant metastasis. Of the subset of patients eligible for curative intent surgery, the 5-year survival rate is only 20%. Negative surgical margins, tumor size, stage, and node negative disease are traditional prognostic indicators. However, these can be limited in their ability to predict patient specific prognosis. KOC is an oncofetal RNA-binding protein involved in RNA stabilization and cell growth during embryogenesis. Previous studies have revealed that KOC mRNA is inappropriately overexpressed in pancreatic cancer and that increased expression correlates with tumor stage. In this study, we attempt to identify whether KOC expression in patients who undergo curative intent surgery correlates with progression free survival. Methods: Tissue microarrays prepared from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens of patients with PDAC who underwent curative intent surgery were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Results: A total of 35 patients were included. Comparisons between groups on progression free survival are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. KOC was overexpressed in 23.6% of tumors. It was found that there were zero patients with a high KOC expression and no distant metastasis. Patients with a high KOC expression were more than 3 times more likely to progress compared to those with a low KOC expression (HR=3.54, 95% CI: 1.34, 9.36, p=0.011). Conclusions: KOC is a useful prognostic biomarker for predicting those patients with PDAC who have a high risk for early progression and distant metastasis. Identifying patients with high KOC expression upon initial diagnosis can serve as a way to risk stratify patients to aggressive treatment regimens upfront and early exposure to clinical trials.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of second-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine after progression on FOLFIRINOX for unresectable or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: multicenter retrospective analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592092342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heejung Chae ◽  
Hyehyun Jeong ◽  
Jaekyung Cheon ◽  
Hong Jae Chon ◽  
Hyewon Ryu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

Background: FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, folinic acid, irinotecan plus oxaliplatin) is an effective standard first-line treatment option for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). There is no clear consensus on the second-line treatment following progression on FOLFIRINOX. In this multicenter retrospective analysis, we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of second-line nab-P/Gem (nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine) after progression on FOLFIRNOX in PDAC. Methods: Patients with unresectable or metastatic PDAC who received nab-P/Gem after progression on FOLFIRINOX between February 2016 and February 2019 were identified from five referral cancer centers in South Korea. Baseline characteristics, treatment history, survival outcomes, and toxicity profile were obtained retrospectively from medical records. Results: A total of 102 patients treated with second-line nab-P/Gem for advanced PDAC after progression on FOLFIRINOX were included. At the time of nab-P/Gem, the median age was 60 years, with males comprising 49.0%, and most (75.5%) had metastatic disease. Patients received a median of three cycles (range 1–12) of nab-P/Gem. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of second-line nab-P/Gem therapy were 9.8 (95% CI, 8.9–10.6) and 4.6 months (3.7–5.5), respectively. A partial response was achieved in 8.5%, and the disease control rate was 73.6%. From the start of first-line FOLFIRIOX, the OS1+2 and PFS1+2 were 20.9 (15.7–26.1) and 13.9 (10.8–17.0) months, respectively, with a 2-year survival rate of 45.1%. There was no treatment-related mortality and grade ⩾3 toxicity was observed in 60.2%. Conclusion: Our results showed that nab-P/Gem was an effective and tolerable second-line treatment option in medically fit patients with advanced PDAC who progressed on first-line FOLFIRNOX. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04133155

DocOx (AIO-PK0106): A phase II trial with docetaxel and oxaliplatin as a second-line systemic therapy for patients with advanced and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas—Final results.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 352-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Jens Ettrich ◽  
Lukas Perkhofer ◽  
Volker Kaechele ◽  
Andreas W. Berger ◽  
Melanie Guethle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

352 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma still remains a major cause of cancer related deaths in the western world. The current study was conducted to confirm the activity and feasibility of docetaxel/ oxaliplatin combination in second line treatment of advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Methods: Prospective single arm, non-randomized, multi-center, Simon’s two stage phase II trial using docetaxel (75 mg/m2, 60 min, d 1) and oxaliplatin (80 mg/m2, 120 min, d 2) in 21-day cycles. Duration of the trial was scheduled up two 8 cycles. Primary endpoint was tumor response according to RECIST 1.0. Secondary endpoints were progression free survival, overall survival, safety/toxicity, quality of life and clinical benefit. Results: Data represents the intention to treat analysis of 44 patients included between 2008 and 2012. The majority of patients received a gemcitabine based first-line chemotherapy (95.5%). The primary endpoint of tumor response was achieved in 15.9% (7 partial remissions, no complete remission), with a disease control rate of 48% after the first two treatment cycles. Median progression free survival was 7 weeks (CI 6-15.9 weeks) and overall survival 40 weeks (CI 20.4-56.4 weeks). No unexpected adverse events occured. The recorded AEs were mainly hematologic (neutropenia grade 3/4 63.6%, febrile neutropenia 4.6%), gastrointestinal (29.6% grade 3/4 AEs) and infectious (18.2% grade 3/4 AEs). Conclusions: In this single-arm second line trial for the treatment of advanced PDAC, the combination of docetaxel and oxaliplatin shows promising results comparable with other second line protocols such as OFF (oxaliplatin, 5-FU, leucovorin) or liposomal irinotecan (MM-398) plus 5-FU/leucovorin (NAPOLI 1-trial). Some patients seem to benefit particularly as indicated by long periods of treatment in this setting. Even after 8 cycles of treatment with DocOx, partial response was observed in 2 patients and stable disease in another 6 patients corresponding to a disease control rate of 18%. The toxicity profile was quite tolerable and comparable to other second line studies. Clinical trial information: NCT00690300.

The prognostic value of stroma desmoplasia in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 211-211
Author(s):  
Emmanouil Fokas ◽  
Michael A Silva ◽  
Zenobia D'Costa ◽  
Robin Bockelmann ◽  
Zahir Soonawalla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Smooth Muscle Actin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Stellate Cells ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Local Progression

211 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) often presents an abundant desmoplastic stroma. We assessed the prognostic value of stroma density and activity in patients with resectable PDAC treated with surgery and adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Methods: FFPE-tissue originating from the pancreatectomy of 145 patients was immunohistochemicallystained for haematoxylin-eosin and Masson’s trichrome to assess stroma density, and alpha-smooth muscle actin (αSMA) expression for activated pancreatic stellate cells. Their expression was correlated with clinicopathological characteristics as well as overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local progression-free survival (LPFS) and distant metastases free-survival (DMFS). Results: After a mean follow-up of 20 months (range, 2-69 months), the median OS was 21 months and the 3-year OS was 35.7 %. In multivariate analysis, highly-dense stroma was an independent prognostic parameter for OS (p = 0.001), PFS (p = 0.007), LPFS (p = 0.001) and DMFS (p = 0.002), while αSMA expression lacked significance. Interestingly, highly-dense stroma retained significance for the four clinical endpoints only in early (pT1-2) but not late (pT3-4) stage tumors. Additionally, late pT-stage (pT3-4), the presence of lymph node metastases (pN+ vs pN0), perineural/neural invasion PNI and adjuvant chemotherapy also correlated with prognosis in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: In summary, stroma density represents an independent prognostic marker in PDAC patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Our findings highlight the complexity of desmoplasia and indicate that highly-dense stroma is associated with better outcome. Further validation of the prognostic value of stroma as a biomarker and its role in PDAC biology is warranted and will be performed in a prospective study.

scholarly journals hENT1 Testing in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Are We Ready? A Multimodal Evaluation of hENT1 Status

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome Raffenne ◽  
Remy Nicolle ◽  
Francesco Puleo ◽  
Delphine Le Corre ◽  
Camille Boyez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Mrna Level ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Predictive Biomarker ◽  
Nucleoside Transport ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Multicenter Cohort

Gemcitabine is still one of the standard chemotherapy regimens for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Gemcitabine uptake into tumor cells is mainly through the human equilibrative nucleoside transport 1 (hENT1). It was therefore proposed as a potential predictive biomarker of gemcitabine efficacy but reports are conflicting, with an important heterogeneity in methods to assess hENT1 expression. A multicenter cohort of 471 patients with a resected PDAC was used to assess simultaneously the predictive value of the 2 best described hENT1 antibodies (10D7G2 and SP120). Three additional antibodies and the predictive value of hENT1 mRNA were also tested on 251 and 302 patients, respectively. hENT1 expression was assessed in 54 patients with matched primary tumors and metastases samples. The 10D7G2 clone was the only hENT1 antibody whose high expression was associated with a prolonged progression free survival and overall survival in patients who received adjuvant gemcitabine. hENT1 mRNA level was also predictive of gemcitabine benefit. hENT1 status was concordant in 83% of the cases with the best concordance in synchronous metastases. The 10D7G2 clone has the best predictive value of gemcitabine benefit in PDAC patients. Since it is not commercially available, hENT1 mRNA level could represent an alternative to assess hENT1 status.

scholarly journals Nanoliposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and folinic acid as a second-line treatment option in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Se Jun Park ◽  
Hyunho Kim ◽  
Kabsoo Shin ◽  
Tae Ho Hong ◽  
Ja Hee Suh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival ◽  
Nanoliposomal Irinotecan ◽  
Previously Treated

Abstract Background According to the NAPOLI-1 trial, nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/LV) showed improved overall survival compared to fluorouracil alone for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who were previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy. In that trial, Asian patients had frequent dose modification due to haematological toxicity. There has been limited information on the clinical benefits and toxicity of this regimen in real-world settings. In this study, we assessed real-world experience of nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine failure. Methods We conducted a single institution, retrospective analysis of response, survival and safety in patients who had been treated with nal-IRI with 5-FU/LV. Patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy received nal-IRI (80 mg/m2) with 5-FU/LV every 2 weeks. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to obtain median progression free survival and median overall survival. The hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a stratified Cox regression model. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify the effects of clinical factors. Results Fifty-one patients received nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV between January 2015 and December 2020. The median age was 67 years, and males were 58.8%. A total of 40 (78.4%) and 11 (21.6%) patients had received one and two lines of prior chemotherapy before enrollment, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% CI 1.8–3.7) and median overall survival was 7.0 months (95% CI 6.0–7.9). Chemotherapy doses were reduced or delayed in 33 (64.7%) patients during the first 6 weeks and median relative dose intensity was 0.87. Thirty-six (70.6%) patients experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events, most commonly neutropenia (58.8%). Most non-haematologic adverse events were under grade 2. Since the start of first-line chemotherapy, median overall survival was 16.3 months (95% CI 14.1–18.4). Conclusions Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV seems to be effective, with manageable toxicities, following gemcitabine-based treatment in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV following gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel is a feasible sequential treatment option in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.

scholarly journals Deciphering CHFR Role in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iranzu González-Borja ◽  
Emilia Alors-Pérez ◽  
Irene Amat ◽  
Laura Alonso ◽  
Cristina Viyuela-García ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Ring Finger ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Entire Cohort

Checkpoint with forkhead-associated and ring finger domains (CHFR) has been proposed as a predictive and prognosis biomarker for different tumor types, but its role in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unknown. The aim of this study was two-pronged: to review the role of CHFR in PDAC and evaluating CHFR as a potential predictive biomarker in this disease. For this purpose, we first explored the CHFR messenger (m)RNA expression and promoter methylation through the TCGA database. Secondly, the CHFR expression and promoter methylation were prospectively evaluated in a cohort of patients diagnosed with borderline (n = 19) or resectable (n = 16) PDAC by immunohistochemistry (IHC), methylation specific-PCR (MSP), and pyrosequencing. The results from the TCGA database showed significant differences in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) based on the CHFR mRNA expression, which was likely independent from the promoter methylation. Importantly, our results showed that in primarily resected patients and also the entire cohort, a higher CHFR expression as indicated by the higher IHC staining intensity might identify patients with longer disease-free survival (DFS) and OS, respectively. Similarly, in the same cohorts, patients with lower methylation levels by pyrosequencing showed significantly longer OS than patients without this pattern. Both, the CHFR expression intensity and its promoter methylation were established as independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS in the entire cohort. In contrast, no significant differences were found between different methylation patterns for CHFR and the response to taxane-based neoadjuvant treatment. These results suggest the potential role of the higher expression of CHFR and the methylation pattern of its promoter as potential prognostic biomarkers in PDAC, thus warranting further comprehensive studies to extend and confirm our preliminary findings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document