New genomic markers for improved decision making in the prostate cancer active surveillance era

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 85-85
Author(s):  
Ranko Miocinovic ◽  
Amit R. Patel
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Genomic Markers

scholarly journals Perceptions of partial gland ablation for prostate cancer among men on active surveillance: a qualitative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. e000068
Author(s):  
Sonia Hur ◽  
Michael Tzeng ◽  
Eliza Cricco-Lizza ◽  
Spyridon Basourakos ◽  
Miko Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Perceptions And Attitudes ◽  
Partial Gland Ablation

ObjectivesPartial gland ablation (PGA) therapy is an emerging treatment modality that targets specific areas of biopsy-proven prostate cancer (PCa) to minimize treatment-related morbidity by sparing benign prostate. This qualitative study aims to explore and characterize perceptions and attitudes toward PGA in men with very-low-risk, low-risk, and favorable intermediate-risk PCa on active surveillance (AS).Design92 men diagnosed with very-low-risk, low-risk, and favorable intermediate-risk PCa on AS were invited to participate in semistructured telephone interviews on PGA.SettingSingle tertiary care center located in New York City.Participants20 men with very-low-risk, low-risk, and favorable intermediate-risk PCa on AS participated in the interviews.Main outcome measuresEmerging themes on perceptions and attitudes toward PGA were developed from transcripts inductively coded and analyzed under standardized methodology.ResultsFour themes were derived from 20 interviews that represent the primary considerations in treatment decision-making: (1) the feeling of psychological safety associated with low-risk disease; (2) preference for minimally invasive treatments; (3) the central role of the physician; (4) and the pursuit of treatment options that align with disease severity. Eleven men (55%) expressed interest in pursuing PGA only if their cancer were to progress, while nine men (45%) expressed interest at the current moment.ConclusionsAlthough an emerging treatment modality, patients were broadly accepting of PGA for PCa, with men primarily debating the risks versus benefits of proactively treating low-risk disease. Additional research on men’s preferences and attitudes toward PGA will further guide counseling and shared decision-making for PGA.

scholarly journals ‘It's not like you just had a heart attack’: decision-making about active surveillance by men with localized prostate cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 467-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Volk ◽  
Stephanie L. McFall ◽  
Scott B. Cantor ◽  
Theresa L. Byrd ◽  
Yen-Chi L. Le ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Heart Attack ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer

Decision-Making in Prostate Cancer: Active Surveillance Over Other Treatment Options

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 141 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Bayliss ◽  
Jed Duff ◽  
Phil Stricker ◽  
Kim Walker
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Treatment Options

Perspectives of prostate cancer patients about active surveillance.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 82-82
Author(s):  
Fred Saad ◽  
Margaret Fitch ◽  
Kittie Pang ◽  
Veronique Ouellet ◽  
Carmen Loiselle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Group Interviews

82 Background: In prostate cancer (PC), men diagnosed with low risk disease may be monitored through an active surveillance (AS) approach that runs counter to the traditional message of undergoing treatment as soon as possible following a cancer diagnosis. This research explored the perspectives of men with PC regarding their decision-making process for AS to identify the factors that influenced their decision and assisted health care professionals in discussing AS as an option. Methods: Focus group interviews (n = 7) were held in several Canadian cities with men (n = 52) diagnosed with PC and eligible for AS. The men’s viewpoints were captured regarding their understanding of AS, the factors that influenced their decision to engage in AS, and their experience with the approach. A content and theme analysis was performed on the verbatim transcripts from the interviews. Results: All patients described the perception that their disease was not “large enough” to require treatment. They understood that the waiting process avoided the side effects associated with treatments, and they were comfortable about postponing treatment while undergoing close monitoring. Conversations with their doctor and how AS was described were cited as key influences in their decision. Other influences included availability of information on treatment options, distrust in the health system, personality, experiences and opinions of others, and personal perspectives on quality of life. Conclusions: AS is a relatively new approach for the care of men with low risk PC. Men require a thorough explanation on AS as a safe and valid option, as well as guidance towards supportive resources in their decision-making.

scholarly journals Comparing Perspectives of Canadian Men Diagnosed With Prostate Cancer and Health Care Professionals About Active Surveillance

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 1122-1129
Author(s):  
Margaret Fitch ◽  
Veronique Ouellet ◽  
Kittie Pang ◽  
Simone Chevalier ◽  
Darrel E Drachenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Critical Factor ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Management Approach ◽  
Low Grade

Active surveillance (AS) has gained acceptance as a primary management approach for patients diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer (PC). In this qualitative study, we compared perspectives between patients and health care professionals (HCP) to identify what may contribute to patient–provider discordance, influence patient decision-making, and interfere with the uptake of AS. We performed a systematic comparison of perspectives about AS reported from focus groups with men eligible for AS (7 groups, N = 52) and HCP (5 groups, N = 48) who engaged in conversations about AS with patient. We used conventional content analysis to scrutinize separately focus group transcripts and reached a consensus on similar or divergent viewpoints between them. Patients and clinicians agreed that AS was appropriate for low grade PC and understood the low-risk nature of the disease. They shared the perspective that disease status was a critical factor to pursue or discontinue AS. However, men expressed a greater emphasis on quality of life in their decisions related to AS. Patients and clinicians differed in their perspectives on the clarity, availability, and volume of information needed and offered; clinicians acknowledged variations between HCP when presenting AS, while patients were often compelled to seek additional information beyond what was provided by physicians and experienced difficulty in finding or interpreting information applicable to their situation. A greater understanding of discordant perspectives about AS between patients and HCP can help improve patient engagement and education, inform development of knowledge-based tools or aids for decision-making, and identify areas that require standardization across the clinical practice.

scholarly journals Perceptions of partial gland ablation for prostate cancer among men on active surveillance: A qualitative study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Hur ◽  
Michael Tzeng ◽  
Eliza Cricco-Lizza ◽  
Miko Yu ◽  
Jessica Ancker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Perceptions And Attitudes ◽  
Partial Gland Ablation

Objectives - Partial gland ablation (PGA) therapy is an emerging treatment modality that targets specific areas of biopsy proven prostate cancer (PCa) to minimize treatment-related morbidity by sparing benign prostate. This qualitative study aims to explore and characterize perceptions and attitudes toward PGA in men with very-low-risk, low-risk, and favorable intermediate-risk PCa on active surveillance (AS). Design - 92 men diagnosed with very-low-risk, low-risk, and favorable intermediate-risk PCa on AS were invited to participate in semi-structured telephone interviews on PGA. Setting - Single tertiary care center located in New York City. Participants - 20 men with very-low-risk, low-risk, and favorable intermediate-risk PCa on AS participated in the interviews. Main outcome measures - Emerging themes on perceptions and attitudes toward PGA were developed from transcripts inductively coded and analyzed under standardized methodology. Results - Four themes were derived from twenty interviews that represent the primary considerations in treatment decision-making: (1) the feeling of psychological safety associated with low risk disease; (2) preference for minimally invasive treatments; (3) the central role of the physician; (4) and the pursuit of treatment options that align with disease severity. Eleven men (55%) expressed interest in pursuing PGA only if their cancer were to progress, while 9 men (45%) expressed interest at the current moment. Conclusions - Though an emerging treatment modality, patients were broadly accepting of PGA for PCa with men primarily debating the risks versus benefits of proactively treating low-risk disease. Additional research on men's preferences and attitudes toward PGA will further guide counseling and shared decision-making for PGA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document