Single anastomosis (mini-) gastric bypass for the treatment of Asian type 2 diabetes mellitus

2017 ◽  
pp. 137-137
Author(s):  
Nawaf Alkhalifah ◽  
Wei-Jei Lee
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Mini Gastric Bypass ◽  
Single Anastomosis

scholarly journals Metabolic and Hormonal Changes after Sleeve Gastrectomy and Mini Gastric Bypass in a Rat Model of Induced Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity

Chirurgia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 114 (6) ◽  
pp. 732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurian Stoica ◽  
Amadeus Dobrescu ◽  
Alexandru Isaic ◽  
Gabriel Verdeş ◽  
Cristi Tarţa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Rat Model ◽  
Mini Gastric Bypass ◽  
Hormonal Changes

scholarly journals Efficacy of Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass for Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingjun Quan ◽  
Ao Huang ◽  
Min Ye ◽  
Ming Xu ◽  
Biao Zhuang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mini Gastric Bypass

Background. Controversies on the utility of laparoscopic mini gastric bypass (LMGB) in weight loss and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) control still exist.Methods. We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Review Manager was used to perform the meta-analysis and the weighted mean difference (WMD) and/or odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used to evaluate the overall size effect.Results. The literature search identified 16 studies for systematic review and 15 articles for meta-analysis. Compared with LAGB, LSG, and LRYGB, LMGB showed significant weight loss [WMD, −6.58 (95% CI, −9.37, −3.79),P<0.01(LAGB); 2.86 (95% CI, 1.40, 5.83),P=0.004(LSG); 10.33 (95% CI, 4.30, 16.36),P<0.01(LRYGB)] and comparable/higher T2DM remission results [86.2% versus 55.6%,P=0.06(LAGB); 89.1% versus 76.3%,P=0.004(LAGB); 93.4% versus 77.6%,P=0.006(LAGB)]; LMGB also had shorter learning curve and less operation time than LRYGB [WMD, −35.2 (95% CI, −46.94, −23.46)].Conclusions. LMGB appeared to be effective in weight loss and T2DM remission and noninferior to other bariatric surgeries. However, clinical utility of LMGB needs to be further validated by future prospective randomized controlled trials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document