scholarly journals Public-private partnership development in Kazakhstan: a case study based on international benchmarking

2018 ◽  
Vol 174 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 51-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayapbergen Taubayev ◽  
◽  
Miras Kuttybai ◽  
Yulia Saifullina ◽  
Elena Borisova ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1/2020 (32) ◽  
pp. 70-80
Author(s):  
Maria Schulders ◽  

Public-private partnership (hereinafter: PPP) is not developing according to expectations in Poland. In comparison to other European nations, the success rate of initiated proceedings is still very low. Between 2009 and the first quarter of 2020, only 25% of initiated proceedings were realized. While there is a large number of potential factors influencing the poor outcome of PPP proceedings in Poland – including a small average project size as well as faults in the regulatory framework – this article addresses administrative barriers standing in the way of successful public-private partnership development. The use and necessity of independent advisors will be addressed, as well as the availability of governmental support mechanisms. Administrative solutions for PPP facilitation from Germany will be showcased, such as the PPP Task Force of the German Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing (BMVBW), as well as the creation of Partnerschaften Deutschland AG (PD). The article then aims to showcase the applicability of German administrativ e models to the Polish PPP market on the basis of a comparative case study.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1093-1120
Author(s):  
Mikhail L. KUKLINOV ◽  
Vladimir V. YUGOV

Subject. This article discusses the role of public-private partnership in solving the priorities of the socio-economic development of the regions. Objectives. The article aims to identify institutional factors in public-private partnership development. Methods. For the study, we used the methods of statistical analysis. Results. Regarding the Ural Federal District subjects as a case study, the article examines the dynamics of public-private partnership projects development over the past decade. It considers the forms of institutional corruption and proposes certain mechanisms to overcome it. Conclusions. Analyzing key internal and external factors influencing the development of the public-private partnership system directly or indirectly will help enhance opportunities and capabilities when implementing economic projects.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (9) ◽  
pp. 87-94
Author(s):  
S. V. NEZHDAI ◽  
◽  
A. Yu. LUKYANOVA ◽  
I. S. GRUZINOVA ◽  
A. A. PROSTYAKOV ◽  
...  

The article shows that, in general, cooperation between public authorities and private business is one of the most important factors that generally affect the social and economic development of territories. The powers in the field of organizational and regulatory regulation of public-private partnership issues at the federal level are considered.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hojatolah Gharaee ◽  
Ramin Rezapour ◽  
Naser Derakhshani ◽  
Morteza Ghojazadeh ◽  
Saber Azami-Aghdash

Abstract Background Due to the limited resources of the public sector, the presence of the private sector as an auxiliary to the health sector, to mitigate adverse health effects (AHEs) caused by environmental disasters, seems necessary. Therefore, the present study aimed to develop a Public-Private Partnership (PPP) framework for managing AHE of environmental disasters (case study of Lake Urmia-Iran). Methods This is a qualitative study with grounded theory approach, conducted in 2019. Required data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 20 experts selected through purposive sampling, and analyzed using Content-Analysis. To formulate the initial framework, an experts’ panel, composed of 12 experts, was formed. Delphi method was used to determine the validity of the framework. Results Most participants found the private sector participation in this field, essential and useful. The most important infrastructure for the private sector participation was designing a legal framework and providing adequate resources and facilities. Pollutant assessment and education of families for disease prevention are among the most important areas that the private sector can participate. To evaluate the performance of the private sector, periodic and short-term reports together with documentation should be used, and the evaluation tool should be the checklists agreed by two sectors. Payments to the private sector should be for periodic objectives, based on performance, and after performance confirmation, in the form of combination of fee for services, per capita and performance-based system. Preventing waste of resources, improving service coverage, greater efficiency and attracting public participation were the most important benefits of the private sector participation. Conclusions PPP can be considered by policy makers as an effective policy for reducing the AHE of environmental disasters (especially drying lakes). To this end, the framework presented in this study can be used as an action guide by national and local authorities and policymakers.


Author(s):  
Daniel Hahn

Public private partnerships have been gaining the interest of emergency management and security-related federal organizations. In 2010, the National Academies Press published a framework for resilience-focused private-public sector collaboration which may be the catalyst for how resilience-oriented public private partnerships are developed in the future (National Academies Press. 2010). Public private partnerships can be utilized to increase citizen awareness and preparedness, to address a specific need in a community, or to accomplish any other function that brings a community and government together. “Utilized correctly, a public private partnership is a win-win situation for all participants” (Hahn, 2010, p. 274). Although perceived as very successful, no prior systems analysis has been conducted on these partnerships. In this chapter, a successful public private partnership is evaluated using systems analysis techniques. Results of that analysis, along with details of the original case study and the public private partnership itself are presented.


Author(s):  
Hitendra Pillay ◽  
James J. Watters ◽  
Matthew C. Flynn ◽  
Lutz Hoff

The term partnership is increasingly used by governments, industry, community organizations and schools in supporting their daily activities. Similar to the terms ICT and learning, partnerships are now ubiquitous in policy discourse. Yet, the term remains ill-defined and ambiguous. This chapter reviews and reflects on a government-led industry-school partnership initiative in the state of Queensland, Australia, to understand how the concept was applied and the consequences. PPP principles derived from the literature were used as a framework to review this initiative. The methodology of this qualitative case study involved consultations with stakeholders and an analysis of Gateway schools' policy documents, and research literature. The review suggests that despite the use of terminology akin to PPP projects in Gateway school program and policy documents, the implicit suggestion that this initiative is a public-private partnership can be interpreted as partially tenable. The majority of principles shaping a PPP have not been considered in any significant manner in the Gateway schools program. Although the review recognizes the legitimate and sincere purpose of the Gateway schools program, a more explicit adoption of a PPP framework during the design, monitoring, and evaluation stages could have strengthened the initiative in terms of outcomes, benefits, and sustainability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document