scholarly journals Comparative analysis of some EU member states and EU associated countries to identify the phenomenon of business development in post-socialist countries

2017 ◽  
Vol 163 (1-2(1)) ◽  
pp. 22-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alla Ivashchenko ◽  
◽  
Nataliya Оrlova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Business Development ◽  
Member States ◽  
Eu Member States

scholarly journals Marriage Capacity, Social Values and Law-Making Process

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristi Joamets
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Cultural Differences ◽  
Social Values ◽  
Family Law ◽  
Member States ◽  
Eu Member States ◽  
Law Making ◽  
The Eu

Abstract This article explores capacity to marry in depth, beyond the literal statements presented by legal acts in Estonia. Th e discussion will be focusing on answering the following questions: What is the nature of marriage capacity and how it has been developed in Estonia? What are the values that the Estonian Family Law Act (2010) protects when regulating marriage capacity? In addition a brief comparative analysis will seek to explain how different regulations of the EU member states on the same matter (marriage capacity) are. Th is can also help discussions on whether is it justified to talk about cultural differences of EU member states in the context of marriage capacity or not.

The EU greenhouse gas inventory for the LULUCF sector: I. Overview and comparative analysis of methods used by EU member states

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 247-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viorel NB Blujdea ◽  
Raúl Abad Viñas ◽  
Sandro Federici ◽  
Giacomo Grassi
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Greenhouse Gas ◽  
Greenhouse Gas Inventory ◽  
Member States ◽  
Eu Member States ◽  
The Eu

scholarly journals (In)effective planning capacity of CSDP missions: Comparative analysis of EULEX Kosovo and EUFOR Althea

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivana Boštjancic-Pulko
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Planning Process ◽  
Political Control ◽  
Secondary Importance ◽  
Member States ◽  
Eu Member States ◽  
Operational Level ◽  
Lessons Learnt ◽  
Planning Capacity ◽  
The Eu

This paper evaluates the planning capacity of two Common Security and Defence (CSDP) missions (EULEX Kosovo and EUFOR Althea) in order to assess the effectiveness of CSDP planning process. Both missions suffer due to partial interests within the EU and low positioning of CSDP on political agendas of the member states. Compared to NATO, EU missions' political control is more much detailed once the mission is deployed. CSDP planning architecture has been considerably reformed since the inception of the first missions in 2003, however the supervision by the member states is still present in all phases of restructuring and implementation. EULEX planning process includes a well elaborated lessons learnt process, however the implementation of the findings on the operational level is rather weak whereas EUFOR Althea profited mostly from the access to NATO planning assets. CSDP missions are political missions and their effectiveness seems to be of secondary importance to the EU member states.

Three paths to e-service availability: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis among the EU member states

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Justine Marienfeldt
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Fuzzy Set ◽  
Qualitative Comparative Analysis ◽  
Service Availability ◽  
State Structure ◽  
Member States ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Eu Member States ◽  
Government Capacity ◽  
Managerial Innovation

PurposeThis study aims to explore under which institutional and organizational conditions the national e-government reform efforts of EU member states lead to very high availability of e-services.Design/methodology/approachFollowing e-government literature of information systems and public administration research, this study applies an analytical framework encompassing characteristics of the national politico-administrative system (state structure, government capacity, managerial innovation orientation and civil service system) to understand why a common policy framework does not lead to convergence but great variety in the degree of e-service availability. A comparative case study approach using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) is applied to systematically compare e-service availability in the former 28 EU member states.FindingsThree configurations of sufficient conditions are identified: government capacity in conjunction with either bureaucratic human resource practices, centralized state structure or managerial innovation orientation. Three country clusters are derived: effective bureaucrats, effective centralists and effective managers.Originality/valueThe results demonstrate the importance of administrative effectiveness for the digital transformation. Rather than mimicking best practices, countries are advised to learn from better performing countries that are most similar in terms of institutional and organizational characteristics of the politico-administrative system.

Comparative assessment of structural indicators of Ukraine industry and the European Union

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2(13)) ◽  
pp. 135-145
Author(s):  
Svitlana Ishchuk
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Industrial Sector ◽  
Comparative Assessment ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Member States ◽  
Eu Member States ◽  
Structural Indicators ◽  
The Eu

A comparative analysis of the structural advantages of the industry of Ukraine and the EU member states in terms of the share of industry in: output of the economy, gross value added of the economy, exports of airborne vehicles, as well as the efficiency indicator (the share of airborne emissions in the industry). The place of Ukraine among EU member states is determined on the set of relative and absolute indicators of functioning of the industrial sector of the economy. A detailed comparative estimation of the structure of the airborne assets of the industry of Ukraine and Poland was conducted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document