A multilevel research lens for dealing with complexity in IB research

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
2007 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Miguel ◽  
Félix Moya-Anegón ◽  
Víctor Herrero-Solana

2015 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 3-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigurd Weidemann Løvseth ◽  
Ingrid Snustad ◽  
Amy Leigh Brunsvold ◽  
Geir Skaugen ◽  
Per Eilif Wahl ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 471-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Evert Van de Vliert

AbstractThe impact of the psychological states of the negotiators, the social conditions of negotiations, and the behavior of negotiators on the outcomes of negotiations differs from country to country. Various suboptimal, individual-level, and country-level solutions have been suggested to predict and explain such cross-national variations. Drawing inspiration from a series of cross-cultural studies on job satisfaction and motives for volunteer work that successfully employed multilevel modeling, we propose a multilevel research approach to more accurately examine the generalizability of negotiation models across countries.


2016 ◽  
Vol 148 (2) ◽  
pp. 411-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nieves García-de-Frutos ◽  
José Manuel Ortega-Egea ◽  
Javier Martínez-del-Río

Author(s):  
David Chan

Studies of team-level constructs can produce new insights when researchers explicitly take into account several critical conceptual and methodological issues. This article explicates the conceptual bases for multilevel research on team constructs and discusses specific issues relating to conceptual frameworks, measurement, and data analysis. To advance programmatic research involving team-level constructs, several future research directions concerning issues of substantive content (i.e., changes in the nature of work and teams, member-team fit, linking team-level constructs to higher-level constructs) and strategic approaches (i.e., the construct's theoretical roles, dimensionality and specificity, malleability and changes over time, relationships with Big Data) are proposed.


SAGE Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 215824401666822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Grund ◽  
Oliver Lüdtke ◽  
Alexander Robitzsch

The treatment of missing data can be difficult in multilevel research because state-of-the-art procedures such as multiple imputation (MI) may require advanced statistical knowledge or a high degree of familiarity with certain statistical software. In the missing data literature, pan has been recommended for MI of multilevel data. In this article, we provide an introduction to MI of multilevel missing data using the R package pan, and we discuss its possibilities and limitations in accommodating typical questions in multilevel research. To make pan more accessible to applied researchers, we make use of the mitml package, which provides a user-friendly interface to the pan package and several tools for managing and analyzing multiply imputed data sets. We illustrate the use of pan and mitml with two empirical examples that represent common applications of multilevel models, and we discuss how these procedures may be used in conjunction with other software.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document