scholarly journals Excuse for Realists: Jeong Taehwa in the Unofficial History

2018 ◽  
Vol null (58) ◽  
pp. 51-84
Author(s):  
김일환
Keyword(s):  
1994 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peeter Tulviste ◽  
James V. Wertsch

Abstract We argue that in order to understand how and why history is taught and learned, it is necessary to distinguish between "official" and "unofficial" history. Using this distinction, we examine differing historical representations of events in 1940 that resulted in Estonia's becoming part of the Soviet Union. Results from interviews with six ethnic Estonians are reported in an attempt to examine the differences between their understanding of the official and unofficial histories of the 1940 events. A basic distinction emerged between the official Soviet history, with its relatively coherent narrative line, and the unofficial history, which seems to consist of a set of unorganized anecdotal stories. We suggest that the unofficial historical representation can be understood as a set of counterclaims to the basic claims included in official history and that the unofficial history is generated through a kind of "hidden dialogicality" with the official one. (Psychology; Education)


African Arts ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 18-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Klopper
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-123
Author(s):  
Tamás Kisantal

Abstract The narrative theory of history that studies historical works from the viewpoint of their narrative, rhetorical devices, and ideological strategies highly emphasized the necessity of renewing historiography. In his early essays, the trend’s founding father, Hayden White, positioned history between art and science or fiction and reality and defined the role of historical theory as a kind of “critical historiography” that is both a criticism of actual historical works and a prescriptive theoretical approach with which the contemporary historical discipline can reform itself. This renewal basically meant a formal reorganization with which the historical works and the historical discipline itself could come closer to literature by using narrative methods and rhetorical devices of recent literary works and films. However, after the 1990s, White and his followers had to face some radical problems that compelled them to rethink the role of recent historiography and their theoretical positions as well. Firstly, the so-called “new” historiography did not actually come into existence, or at least not in a way they suggested. Secondly, new forms of “unofficial” history, from varieties of public history through conspiracy theories to contemporary historical fictions, forced to reconceptualize the task of historical theory and its approach to the social and ideological functions of “official” history. Analysing some recently published works of this trend (above all, Hayden White’s concept of “modernist event” and his distinction between two forms of the past, theoretical and practical), my essay tries to define the situation of historical theory among the forms of contemporary historical experience.


Addiction ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 85 (12) ◽  
pp. 1577-1581 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOSE CARLOS FERNANDES GALDUROZ ◽  
JANDIRA MASUR

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document