scholarly journals COGNITIVE REFLECTION TEST - NEXT GENERATION

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anca Tamas
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation ◽  
Cognitive Reflection Test ◽  
Cognitive Reflection

Cognitive Reflection Effects on Time Discounting

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Białek ◽  
Przemysław Sawicki
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Individual Difference ◽  
Delay Discounting ◽  
Reference Point ◽  
Reference Points ◽  
Cognitive Reflection Test ◽  
Process Information ◽  
Time Discounting ◽  
Cognitive Reflection ◽  
The Way

Abstract. In this work, we investigated individual differences in cognitive reflection effects on delay discounting – a preference for smaller sooner over larger later payoff. People are claimed to prefer more these alternatives they considered first – so-called reference point – over the alternatives they considered later. Cognitive reflection affects the way individuals process information, with less reflective individuals relying predominantly on the first information they consider, thus, being more susceptible to reference points as compared to more reflective individuals. In Experiment 1, we confirmed that individuals who scored high on the Cognitive Reflection Test discount less strongly than less reflective individuals, but we also show that such individuals are less susceptible to imposed reference points. Experiment 2 replicated these findings additionally providing evidence that cognitive reflection predicts discounting strength and (in)dependency to reference points over and above individual difference in numeracy.

The cognitive reflection test and regional pathogen load

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kilian James Garvey ◽  
Laura Folse ◽  
Crystal Curry
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Reflection Test ◽  
Cognitive Reflection ◽  
Pathogen Load

EXPRESS: Fooling System 1 in the field of perception: Failure to Intuitively Detect Attribute Substitution in the Flushtration Count Illusion

2021 ◽  
pp. 174702182110693
Author(s):  
Cyril Thomas ◽  
Marion Botella ◽  
André Didierjean
Keyword(s):  
Human Brain ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Cognitive Reflection Test ◽  
Substitution Error ◽  
Perceptual Illusion ◽  
Cognitive Reflection ◽  
Ball Problem ◽  
Perceptual Attribute ◽  
System 1 ◽  
The Relationship

To facilitate our interactions with the surroundings, the human brain sometimes reshapes the situations that it faces in order to simplify them. This phenomenon has been widely studied in the context of reasoning, especially through the attribute substitution error. It has however been given much less attention in the field of perception. Recent research on the bat-and-ball problem suggests that reasoners are able to intuitively detect attribute substitution errors. Using a perceptual illusion drawn from the field of magic, we investigate the extent to which a perceptual form of attribute substitution depends on executive resources and can be detected. We also investigate the relationship between susceptibility to attribute substitution error in the flushtration count illusion and in a French adaptation of the bat-and ball problem. Finally, we investigate the link between the intuitive cognitive style (assessed by the Cognitive Reflection Test) and the susceptibility to the flushtration count illusion. Our results suggest that participants do not detect perceptual attribute substitution error, that this phenomenon could be independent of the executive resources allocated to the task, and could rest on mechanisms distinct from those that produce errors in reasoning. We discuss differences between these two phenomena, and factors that may explain them.

The cognitive reflection test revisited: exploring the ways individuals solve the test

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Szaszi ◽  
A. Szollosi ◽  
B. Palfi ◽  
B. Aczel
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Reflection Test ◽  
Cognitive Reflection

Adapted Cognitive Reflection Test--Extended Version

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eoin Travers ◽  
Jonathan J. Rolison ◽  
Aidan Feeney
Keyword(s):  
Extended Version ◽  
Cognitive Reflection Test ◽  
Cognitive Reflection

Assessing analytic and intuitive reasoning using the cognitive reflection test in young patients with schizophrenia

2020 ◽  
Vol 284 ◽  
pp. 112683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pugaliya Puveendrakumaran ◽  
Gagan Fervaha ◽  
Fernando Caravaggio ◽  
Gary Remington
Keyword(s):  
Young Patients ◽  
Intuitive Reasoning ◽  
Cognitive Reflection Test ◽  
Cognitive Reflection
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document