scholarly journals Long-Term Outcomes of the Calcaneo-Stop Procedure in the Treatment of Flexible Flatfoot in Children: A Retrospective Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisca Pinho Costa ◽  
Gilberto Costa ◽  
Manuel Santos Carvalho ◽  
António Mendes Moura ◽  
Rui Pinto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Daily Living ◽  
Clinical Parameters ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Flexible Flatfoot ◽  
Related Quality

Introduction: Flexible flatfoot is common amongst children, although treatment is rarely indicated. The calcaneo-stop procedure has been reported to be effective in short-term studies. We aim to evaluate the long-term outcomes of the calcaneo-stop procedure in the treatment of flexible flatfoot in children.Material and Methods: Twenty-six calcaneo-stop procedures performed between 1995 and 2006 on 13 patients were evaluated clinically and using photopodoscopy, and the FAOS questionnaire was applied for both feet.Results: Of the 26 feet evaluated, 22 presented with heel valgus, 13 had forefoot supination and 11 had abnormal footprints. Median FAOS questionnaire score was 97.22 for ‘Pain’, 92.86 for ‘Other symptoms’, 98.53 for ‘Function in daily living’, 100 for ‘Function in sports and recreation’ and 93.75 for ‘Foot and ankle-related quality of life’.Discussion: The calcaneo-stop procedure is the least invasive and most simple surgical treatment for symptomatic flexible flatfoot in children. Short-term studies report excellent clinical and radiographic results. The authors report alterations in clinical parameters in a large proportion of patients. These findings can be due to biomechanical alterations in the years following removal of the screw. Patient foot and ankle-related satisfaction data is promising, although hard to evaluate given the absence of preoperative data.Conclusion: Larger, prospective, controlled studies are required to better evaluate the long-term success of this procedure.

scholarly journals Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma: protocol for a systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e017571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irmela Gnass ◽  
Michaela Ritschel ◽  
Silke Andrich ◽  
Silke Kuske ◽  
Kai Moschinski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Activities Of Daily Living ◽  
Daily Living ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Patient Reported

IntroductionSurvivors of polytrauma experience long-term and short-term burden that influences their lives. The patients’ view of relevant short-term and long-term outcomes should be captured in instruments that measure quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after a polytrauma. The aim of this systematic review is to (1) collect instruments that assess PROs (quality of life, social participation and activities of daily living) during follow-up after polytrauma, (2) describe the instruments’ application (eg, duration of period of follow-up) and (3) investigate other relevant PROs that are also assessed in the included studies (pain, depression, anxiety and cognitive function).Methods and analysisThe systematic review protocol is developed in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the trials registers ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform will be searched. Keywords, for example, ‘polytrauma’, ‘multiple trauma’, ‘quality of life’, ‘activities of daily living’ or ‘pain’ will be used. Publications published between January 2005 and the most recent date (currently: August 2016) will be included. In order to present the latest possible results, an update of the search is conducted before publication. The data extraction and a content analysis will be carried out systematically. A critical appraisal will be performed.Ethics and disseminationFormal ethical approval is not required as primary data will not be collected. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed publication.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017060825.

Health-Related Quality of Life and Cosmesis After Thyroidectomy: Long-Term Outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-141
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Linos ◽  
Spyridon Christodoulou ◽  
Vassiliki Kitsou ◽  
Angeliki Karachaliou ◽  
Spyridon Ntelis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Failure of long-term nerve root stimulation to improve neuropathic pain

2008 ◽  
Vol 108 (5) ◽  
pp. 921-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf Weigel ◽  
Hans-Holger Capelle ◽  
Joachim K. Krauss
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Nerve Root ◽  
Daily Living ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Test Stimulation ◽  
Root Stimulation

Object Stimulation of dorsal nerve roots or dorsal root ganglia was reported to alleviate neuropathic pain in selected patients during the early postoperative period. A prospective study was initiated to investigate long-term outcome in patients with neuropathic pain of the lower extremities or groin who were treated with selective nerve root stimulation. Methods The study included patients with dermatomally distributed neuropathic pain who were > 18 years of age and in whom the pain was refractory to medical treatment. The patients were prospectively evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and ratings for quality of life, activities of daily living, and depression preoperatively, and after defined intervals postoperatively. Implantation of electrodes was performed via foraminotomy or interlaminar fenestration in an awake procedure. An implantable pulse generator (IPG) was implanted in a second operation after successful test stimulation performed over several days. Results Three patients were included in the study before it was stopped. The mean maximum pain score preoperatively was 9.3. All patients had successful test stimulation with > 50% pain relief prior to implantation of the IPG (mean maximum VAS Score 3.6). The beneficial effect, however, was lost within the next few months despite adjustment of stimulation settings. With higher amplitudes, side effects such as pain attacks or motor phenomena occurred. They disappeared after stopping stimulation, but neuropathic pain recurred to its full extent. The study was stopped 18 months after the first implantation, when the third and last IPG of this series was explanted. Due to the overall short-term effect of stimulation, no relevant changes in ratings for quality of life, activities of daily living, or depression were detected. Conclusions Spinal nerve root stimulation proved to be effective on short-term follow-up in 3 patients with neuropathic pain in a dermatomal distribution. Long-term stimulation, however, was disappointing because of the loss of effectiveness and the occurrence of side effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document