scholarly journals Hyperplastic Polyp? Look Again... The Impact of the New Classification for Serrated Polyps

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catarina Fidalgo ◽  
Liliana Santos ◽  
Isadora Rosa ◽  
Ricardo Fonseca ◽  
Pedro Lage ◽  
...  

<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><strong>Introduction:</strong> The World Health Organization reviewed the classification for serrated colonic polyps in 2010. A new entity, sessile serrated adenoma, was included with two variants: with and without cytological dysplasia. This lesion’s malignant potential has been recognized and according to the new classification, many polyps may be reclassified. The impact of this change is yet to be assessed.<br /><strong>Objective:</strong> Analyze the proportion of lesions that were reclassified according to the new World Health Organization classification and the variables that influenced it.<br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> Every patient with at least one sessile serrated adenoma diagnosed in a 5 year period was included. All polyps (regardless of type) resected during the study period were reviewed. Data concerning polyp’s characteristics and patient variables were collected. Forty consecutive patients were included [13 female, mean age at 1st sessile serrated adenoma -59 yrs (34-80)].<br /><strong>Results:</strong> Were reviewed 247 polyps: hyperplastic - 42%; conventional adenomas - 29%; sessile serrated adenoma - 24%; serrated adenomas - 5%. Sixty-three polyps were reclassified: 43 hyperplastic, 12 serrated adenomas, 7 sessile serrated adenoma and 1 conventional adenoma with low grade dysplasia. Reclassification was significantly greater for hyperplastic polyps when compared with the other subtypes. Forty-three of one hundred and four (41%) hyperplastic polyps were reclassified all as sessile serrated adenoma. In these polyps the probability of reclassification was independent from polyp location but was greater if polyp size ≥ 5 mm.<br /><strong>Discussion: </strong>This is a single center, rectrospective study. The fact that it was done in an Oncology Referral Institution with a Family Risk Clinic may have influenced the results. Nevertheless the impressive reclassification rate for Hyperplastic Polyps and the fact that they were reclassified mainly as Serrated Adenomas makes these results relevant to daily practice.<br /><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Our results suggest that, according to the new World Health Organization classification for serrated colonic polyps, a considerable proportion of hyperplastic polyps will be reclassified. The serrated pathway of colorectal carcinogenesis has probably been underestimated and at-risk patients may have been under inappropriate surveillance.<br /><strong>Keywords: </strong>Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis; Colonic Polyps/classification; World Health Organization; Neoplasm Grading.</span></p>

2007 ◽  
Vol 131 (7) ◽  
pp. 1110-1116
Author(s):  
M. Tarek Elghetany

Abstract Context.—Pediatric myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are uncommon disorders, which may be difficult to diagnose, particularly in the absence of increased blasts. Pediatric MDSs have several unique features including their association with inherited/constitutional disorders in approximately one third of patients. The classification of pediatric MDSs has undergone significant evolution in the past 20 years. Objective.—To critically review existing classifications of pediatric MDSs and to evaluate their applicability on previously published large series. Data Sources.—Previously published pediatric MDS series containing more than 10 patients from the English literature between 1982 and 2005. Conclusions.—Data were available on 887 patients from 13 published series. Most cases (68.7%) were idiopathic/ de novo, 23.9% were associated with constitutional/inherited disorder, and 7.4% were therapy related. Approximately 10% of cases could not be classified by the French-American-British classification. Eighty-seven percent of unclassified cases were appropriately classified using the World Health Organization classification (2001), whereas 96% of them were classified with the modified World Health Organization classification for pediatric MDSs (2003). The impact of cytogenetics and constitutional/inherited disorders on the biology and outcome of the disease needs to be studied further.


2016 ◽  
Vol 140 (5) ◽  
pp. 437-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joo Young Kim ◽  
Seung-Mo Hong

Context.—Gastrointestinal (GI) and pancreatobiliary tracts contain a variety of neuroendocrine cells that constitute a diffuse endocrine system. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) from these organs are heterogeneous tumors with diverse clinical behaviors. Recent improvements in the understanding of NETs from the GI and pancreatobiliary tracts have led to more-refined definitions of the clinicopathologic characteristics of these tumors. Under the 2010 World Health Organization classification scheme, NETs are classified as grade (G) 1 NETs, G2 NETs, neuroendocrine carcinomas, and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas. Histologic grades are dependent on mitotic counts and the Ki-67 labeling index. Several new issues arose after implementation of the 2010 World Health Organization classification scheme, such as issues with well-differentiated NETs with G3 Ki-67 labeling index and the evaluation of mitotic counts and Ki-67 labeling. Hereditary syndromes, including multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome, von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, neurofibromatosis 1, and tuberous sclerosis, are related to NETs of the GI and pancreatobiliary tracts. Several prognostic markers of GI and pancreatobiliary tract NETs have been introduced, but many of them require further validation. Objective.—To understand clinicopathologic characteristics of NETs from the GI and pancreatobiliary tracts. Data Sources.—PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) reports were reviewed. Conclusions.—In this review, we briefly summarize recent developments and issues related to NETs of the GI and pancreatobiliary tracts.


2001 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 1059-1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Brambilla ◽  
W.D. Travis ◽  
T.V. Colby ◽  
B. Corrin ◽  
Y. Shimosato

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document