scholarly journals Sharing SoTL Findings with Students: An Intentional Knowledge Mobilization Strategy

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 333-348
Author(s):  
Trent W. Maurer ◽  
Cherie Woolmer ◽  
Nichole L. Powell ◽  
Carol Sisson ◽  
Catherine Snelling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Broker ◽  
Knowledge Mobilization ◽  
Teaching Community ◽  
Community Property

This paper critically examines the reasons for and processes of sharing SoTL findings with students. Framed by our commitment to SoTL’s role to make teaching “community property,” we interpret sharing SoTL findings with students as an act of knowledge mobilization, where SoTL might be disseminated, translated, or co-created with the student as a legitimate knowledge broker. We connect these knowledge mobilization processes with four primary reasons why faculty might want to share SoTL findings with students. Finally, we provide examples of knowledge mobilization that use different “voices” found in contemporary communication settings and that reach various student audiences in micro, meso, macro, and mega contexts.

scholarly journals Sharing SoTL Findings with Students: An Intentional Knowledge Mobilization Strategy

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 333-348
Author(s):  
Trent W. Maurer ◽  
Cherie Woolmer ◽  
Nichole L. Powell ◽  
Carol Sisson ◽  
Catherine Snelling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Broker ◽  
Knowledge Mobilization ◽  
Teaching Community ◽  
Community Property

This paper critically examines the reasons for and processes of sharing SoTL findings with students. Framed by our commitment to SoTL’s role to make teaching “community property,” we interpret sharing SoTL findings with students as an act of knowledge mobilization, where SoTL might be disseminated, translated, or co-created with the student as a legitimate knowledge broker. We connect these knowledge mobilization processes with four primary reasons why faculty might want to share SoTL findings with students. Finally, we provide examples of knowledge mobilization that use different “voices” found in contemporary communication settings and that reach various student audiences in micro, meso, macro, and mega contexts.

scholarly journals An Institutional Process for Brokering Community-Campus Research Collaborations

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Phipps ◽  
Michael Johnny ◽  
Jane Wedlock
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Research ◽  
Knowledge Broker ◽  
Knowledge Mobilization ◽  
Knowledge Brokering ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Research Project ◽  
United Way ◽  
Regional Approach ◽  
Research Collaborations ◽  
Institutional Process

Knowledge mobilization seeks to identify and support authentic research collaborations between community and university so that benefits of the research accrue to both partners. Knowledge brokering is a key knowledge mobilization mechanism that helps community and university partners connect and build relationships in order to share expertise for mutual opportunity. There remains a need to describe in detail the typical knowledge brokering devices and methodologies. This paper presents a detailed description of York University’s knowledge brokering service which is based on eight years of knowledge mobilization practice. The process is broken into 5 broad stages: 1) in progress; 2) no match; 3) match and no activity; 4) match and activity; 5) match and project. Stage 5 includes a step to identify the non-academic impacts of the collaborative research project. This process is illustrated using examples from York University’s practice in which a match was brokered for 82% of the 342 knowledge mobilization opportunities received between 2006-2014. York University partners with United Way York Region (UWYR) to create a regional approach to knowledge mobilization supports. This paper illustrates the impacts on community and university knowledge mobilization partners following the introduction of a community-based knowledge broker at UWYR. 

Evaluation of the Role of Knowledge Broker in School-based Youth Tobacco Control

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Manske ◽  
Bill Morrison ◽  
Irene Lambraki ◽  
Cynthia Mathieson
Keyword(s):  
Tobacco Control ◽  
Knowledge Broker ◽  
School Based

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON GONO GINI'S ASSETS DUE TO A DEATH ACCORDING TO THE ISLAMIC LAW AND POSITIVE LAW

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pardan Syafrudin
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Common Property ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Community Property ◽  
Communal Property ◽  
Islamic Jurisprudence ◽  
Legal Restriction ◽  
The Common ◽  
Husband And Wife

The Common properties (community property) is an asset that the husband and wife acquired during the household lifes, which both of them is agree that after united through marriage bonds, that the property produced by one or both of them will be common property. It shows, that if there's an agreement between husband and wife before marriage (did not to unify their property), then the property produced both will not become a joint treasure. Thus, if a husband or wife dies, or divorces, then the property owned by both of them can be distributed in accordance with their respective shares, another case when the two couples are not making an agreement, then the property gained during marriage bonds can be divided into types of communal property. In Islamic law, this kind of treasure is not contained in the Qur'an or Sunnah. Nor in Islamic jurisprudence. However, Islamic law legalizes the existence of common property as long as it is applicable in a society and the benefit in the distribution of such property. In contrast to the positive law, this property types have been regulated and described in the Marriage Law, as well as the Islamic Law Compilations, which became the legal restriction in the affairs of marriage in force in Indonesia. In this study, the author tries to compile the existence of common property according to the Islamic law reviews and positive law.

Supporting Knowledge Translation Through Evaluation: Evaluator as Knowledge Broker

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Donnelly ◽  
Lori Letts ◽  
Don Klinger ◽  
Lyn Shulha
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Translation ◽  
Knowledge Broker

READINESS OF RUSSIAN HIGHER EDUCATION TEACHERS TO WORK IN EDUCATIONAL INCLUSION SETTING

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-45
Author(s):  
.D. Kalugina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Survey Research ◽  
Inclusive Education ◽  
Maturity Level ◽  
Social Survey ◽  
General Attitude ◽  
University Teachers ◽  
Teaching Community ◽  
Russian Higher Education ◽  
Educational Inclusion

the article deals with the problem of implementing inclusive education in Russianuniversities . Despite the fact that education (training?) for people with disabilities has been implemented at all levels of Russianeducationfor several years, the general attitude to it is ambiguous, as well as the attitudeof the teaching community. The author has conducted a social survey research trying to estimate University teachers’ readiness to work with groups where such students study. The research has revealed insufficient motivational and technological maturity level. Following this, the author providesrecommendations for overcoming these challenges.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document