scholarly journals The Importance of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-lymphocyte ratio, and thrombocyte-lymphocyte ratio in addition to abnormal laboratory parameters in COVID-19 pneumonia

2021 ◽  
pp. 394-401
Author(s):  
Nermin KENİ BEGENDİ ◽  
Fatma KAÇAR ◽  
Mikail DAĞ ◽  
Arzu TARAKÇI ◽  
Şule ÖZDEMİR ARMAĞAN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Parameters ◽  
Abnormal Laboratory ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio

scholarly journals NEWS2 and laboratory predictors correlated with clinical deterioration in hospitalised patients with COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gulsah Tuncer ◽  
Serkan Surme ◽  
Osman Faruk Bayramlar ◽  
Hatice Kubra Karanalbant ◽  
Betul Copur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Clinical Deterioration ◽  
Dynamic Monitoring ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Univariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Laboratory Parameters ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Hospitalised Patients

ABSTRACTBackgroundWe aimed to determine prognostic values of NEWS2 and laboratory parameters during the first week of COVID-19.MethodsAll adult patients who were hospitalized for a confirmed COVID-19 between the 11th of March and the 11th of May 2020 were retrospectively included. To evaluate the factors in prognosis which are admission to intensive care unit (ICU) and in-hospital death, univariate logistic regression analysis was performed at admission (D0), at day-3 (D3), day-5 (D5), and day-7 (D7). Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed.ResultsOverall, 611 patients were included. Clinical deterioration was observed in 79 (12.9%) patients during hospitalisation, 36 (5.9%) during the first three days, 54 (8.8%) during the first five days, and 62 (10.1%) during the first week of hospitalisation. Our results showed that NEWS2, procalcitonin, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and albumin were the best predictors for clinical deterioration at D0, D3, D5, and D7. Procalcitonin had the highest odds ratio for clinical deterioration on all days in univariate analysis. ROC analyses showed that NEWS2 at D7, procalcitonin at D5, albumin at D7, and NLR at D5 had highest AUC values. Additionally, we detected a strong correlation between NEWS2 and laboratory parameters including neutrophil, lymphocyte, NLR, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, CRP, procalcitonin, ferritin, and urea on all days.ConclusionThis study provides a list of several laboratory parameters correlated with NEWS2 and potential predictors for ICU admission or in-hospital death during the clinical course of COVID-19. Dynamic monitoring of NEWS2 and laboratory parameters is vital for improving clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals National Early Warning Score 2 and laboratory predictors correlate with clinical deterioration in hospitalized patients with COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gulsah Tuncer ◽  
Serkan Surme ◽  
Osman F Bayramlar ◽  
Hatice K Karanalbant ◽  
Betul Copur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Warning ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Clinical Deterioration ◽  
Early Warning Score ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Laboratory Parameters ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
National Early Warning Score

Aim: We aimed to determine the prognostic values of the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) and laboratory parameters during the first week of COVID-19. Materials & methods: All adult patients who were hospitalized for confirmed COVID-19 between 11 March and 11 May 2020 were retrospectively included. Results: Overall, 611 patients were included. Our results showed that NEWS2, procalcitonin, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and albumin at D0, D3, D5 and D7 were the best predictors for clinical deterioration defined as a composite of ICU admission during hospitalization or in-hospital death. Procalcitonin had the highest odds ratio for clinical deterioration on all days. Conclusion: This study provides a list of several laboratory parameters correlated with NEWS2 and potential predictors for clinical deterioration in patients with COVID-19.

scholarly journals Can NLR, PLR and LMR be used as prognostic indicators in patients with pulmonary embolism? A commentary

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cihan Bedel ◽  
Mustafa Korkut ◽  
Hamit Hakan Armağan
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Systemic Infection ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Prognostic Indicators ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
Laboratory Parameters ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio

We read with great interest the article “Prognostic role of NLR, PLR, and LMR in patients with pulmonary embolism” by Köse et al.[1]. They found that the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) were related to the prognosis and clinical severity of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). First of all, we congratulate the authors for their invaluable contribution to literature. However, we think that there are some points that should be discussed regarding the use of these laboratory parameters. White blood cell subtypes NLR, PLR, and LMR have been associated with many inflammatory diseases, including PE [2,3]. These parameters, which can be easily determined by simple and easy measurement of systemic inflammation, maintain their importance today. However, these parameters are affected by many factors such as trauma, local or systemic infection, acute coronary syndromes, and malignancy [3-5]. For these reasons, it would be better for the authors to mention these factors and exclude them from the tables that included malignancy and trauma patients in the study. It is known that drugs including steroids can increase neutrophils and decrease lymphocytes and therefore affect NLR, PLR and LMR values [6]. Therefore, it will be more valuable to exclude patients who use drugs that may affect laboratory parameters. In addition, plasma inflammatory biomarkers are time dependent variables, the time of sample collection and the time from the onset of the symptom to the sampling may have an impact on the parameters [3-6]. Therefore, it is important to identify the time from first symptom to sample collection and the factors that may affect it. In conclusion, because NLR, PLR and LMR can be affected by many factors, prospective studies with large populations are needed to show the accuracy of use in critically ill patients.

Association of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio with Mild Cognitive Impairment in Elderly Chinese Adults: A Case-control Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (14) ◽  
pp. 1309-1315
Author(s):  
Peilin An ◽  
Xuan Zhou ◽  
Yue Du ◽  
Jiangang Zhao ◽  
Aili Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Cognitive Function ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Elderly Chinese ◽  
Normal Cognitive Function ◽  
The Absolute

Background: Inflammation plays a significant role in the pathophysiology of cognitive impairment in previous studies. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a reliable measure of systemic inflammation. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between NLR and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and further to explore the diagnostic potential of the inflammatory markers NLR for the diagnosis of MCI in elderly Chinese individuals. Methods: 186 MCI subjects and 153 subjects with normal cognitive function were evaluated consecutively in this study. Neutrophil (NEUT) count and Lymphocyte (LYM) count were measured in fasting blood samples. The NLR was calculated by dividing the absolute NEUT count by the absolute LYM count. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the potential association between NLR and MCI. NLR for predicting MCI was analyzed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: The NLR of MCI group was significantly higher than that of subjects with normal cognitive function (2.39 ± 0.55 vs. 1.94 ± 0.51, P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that higher NLR was an independent risk factor for MCI (OR: 4.549, 95% CI: 2.623-7.889, P < 0.001). ROC analysis suggested that the optimum NLR cut-off point for MCI was 2.07 with 73.66% sensitivity, 69.28% specificity, 74.48% Positive Predictive Values (PPV) and 68.36% negative predictive values (NPV). Subjects with NLR ≥ 2.07 showed higher risk relative to NLR < 2.07 (OR: 5.933, 95% CI: 3.467-10.155, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The elevated NLR is significantly associated with increased risk of MCI. In particular, NLR level higher than the threshold of 2.07 was significantly associated with the probability of MCI.

scholarly journals The Prognostic Significance of Combined Pretreatment Fibrinogen and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Various Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Rongqiang Liu ◽  
Shiyang Zheng ◽  
Qing Yuan ◽  
Peiwen Zhu ◽  
Biao Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Meta Regression

Purpose. The prognostic value of a new scoring system, termed F-NLR, that combines pretreatment fibrinogen level with neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio has been evaluated in various cancers. However, the results are controversial. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively analyze the prognostic value of F-NLR score in patients with cancers. Methods. An integrated search of relevant studies was conducted by screening the PubMed and Embase databases. Pooled hazard ratios, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)/progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated to estimate the prognostic significance of F-NLR score in patients with various tumors. A random effects model was used for comprehensive analysis, and subgroup and meta-regression analyses were used to explore sources of heterogeneity. Results. Thirteen articles reporting data from of 4747 patients were included in the study. Pooled analysis revealed that high F-NLR score was significantly associated with poor OS ( HR = 1.77 ; 95% CI, 1.51–2.08) and poor DFS/PFS ( HR = 1.63 ; 95% CI, 1.30–2.05). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses did not alter the prognostic role of F-NLR score in OS and DFS/PFS. Conclusions. Increased F-NLR score is significantly associated with poor prognosis in patients with cancers and can serve as an effective prognostic indicator.

Blood Cell Parameters and Predicting Coronary In-Stent Restenosis

Angiology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (8) ◽  
pp. 711-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhichao Wang ◽  
Chi Liu ◽  
Hong Fang
Keyword(s):  
Blood Cell ◽  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Blood Cells ◽  
Inflammatory Marker ◽  
Distribution Width ◽  
Cell Parameters ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Stent Restenosis ◽  
In Stent Restenosis

Major advances in coronary interventional techniques and pharmacotherapy as well as the use of drug-eluting stents (DESs) have considerably reduced the risk of in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, ISR remains a major clinical challenge. Inflammation and platelet activation are important processes that underlie the pathophysiology of ISR. Parameters related to blood cells, entailing both cell count and morphology, are useful markers of the inflammatory response and platelet activation in clinical practice. Recent studies have highlighted several new combined or derived parameters related to blood cells that independently predict ISR after DES implantation. The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, an inflammatory marker, is regarded as a predictor of the risk of ISR and the stability of atherosclerotic plaques. The mean platelet volume, a widely used platelet activation parameter, has been shown to be a predictor of the risk of ISR and the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy. Other markers considered include the platelet/lymphocyte ratio, red blood cell distribution width, and platelet distribution width. This review provides an overview of these parameters that may help stratify the risk of coronary angiographic and clinical outcomes related to ISR.

scholarly journals Comparison of Selected Immune and Hematological Parameters and Their Impact on Survival in Patients with HPV-Related and HPV-Unrelated Oropharyngeal Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 3256
Author(s):  
Adam Brewczyński ◽  
Beata Jabłońska ◽  
Agnieszka Maria Mazurek ◽  
Jolanta Mrochem-Kwarciak ◽  
Sławomir Mrowiec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Oropharyngeal Cancer ◽  
Hematological Parameters ◽  
White Blood Cells ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Hpv Status ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
The Impact

Several immune and hematological parameters are associated with survival in patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). The aim of the study was to analyze selected immune and hematological parameters of patients with HPV-related (HPV+) and HPV-unrelated (HPV-) OPC, before and after radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy (RT/CRT) and to assess the impact of these parameters on survival. One hundred twenty seven patients with HPV+ and HPV− OPC, treated with RT alone or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT), were included. Patients were divided according to HPV status. Confirmation of HPV etiology was obtained from FFPE (Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded) tissue samples and/or extracellular circulating HPV DNA was determined. The pre-treatment and post-treatment laboratory blood parameters were compared in both groups. The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and systemic immune inflammation (SII) index were calculated. The impact of these parameters on overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival was analyzed. In HPV+ patients, a high pre-treatment white blood cells (WBC) count (>8.33 /mm3), NLR (>2.13), SII (>448.60) significantly correlated with reduced OS, whereas high NLR (>2.29), SII (>462.58) significantly correlated with reduced DFS. A higher pre-treatment NLR and SII were significant poor prognostic factors for both OS and DFS in the HPV+ group. These associations were not apparent in HPV− patients. There are different pre-treatment and post-treatment immune and hematological prognostic factors for OS and DFS in HPV+ and HPV− patients. The immune ratios could be considered valuable biomarkers for risk stratification and differentiation for HPV− and HPV+ OPC patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document