scholarly journals Has Video Laryngoscopy Improved First Pass and Overall Intubation Success in the University of Florida Health Emergency Department?

2016 ◽  
Vol 02 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bobby Desai ◽  
Jordan Rogers ◽  
Hannah Eason-Bates ◽  
Emily Weeks
2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 433-434
Author(s):  
Fu-Shan Xue ◽  
Gui-Zhen Yang ◽  
Ya-Yang Liu ◽  
Hui-Xian Li

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Weng Wan ◽  
Zakaria Nur Diana ◽  
Seow Gek Ching ◽  
Wong Evelyn

Abstract Background: To our knowledge, there has been no study comparing intubation characteristics between attending and non-attending Emergency Physicians in South-East Asia. We aim to identify whether the use of Direct Laryngoscopy (DL) compared to Video Laryngoscopy (VL) affects first pass success rates between Attending Emergency Physicians (AEP) and Non-Attending Emergency Physicians (NAEP). Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of data from 2009 to 2016 in an existing airway registry managed by and academic Emergency Department in Singapore. Primary outcome is first pass success intubation rate. The secondary outcome was first pass success rate for difficult intubations. Difficult intubations were defined as LEMON score of more than 1 or more than 1 attempt at intubation. Results: There were 2909 intubation carried out by emergency physicians in the Emergency Department from 2009 to 2016. AEP conducted 1748 intubations while NAEP conducted 1161 intubations. The first pass success rates for AEP was 84.2% while that for NAEP was 67.4%. 86.2% of intubations by AEP were done with a direct laryngoscope. 89.0% of the intubations by NAEP were done with a direct laryngoscope. 18.9% of intubations by the AEP were difficult compared to 35.2% by the NAEP (p<0.01 95% C.I 13.0%-19.6%). First pass success rate with VL was lower than DL for all intubations (OR 0.66, 95% C.I 0.51-0.84). In the subgroup of difficult intubations, VL did not improve first pass success rate among AEP (OR 0.77, 95% C.I 0.38-1.58) but it did for NAEP (OR 2.46, 95% C.I 0.94-6.45). Conclusion: Our study showed that VL has a poorer first pass success rate for all intubations in general. However, specifically for difficult intubations, VL is associated with improved first pass success rates among NAEP.


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asad E. Patanwala ◽  
Courtney B. McKinney ◽  
Brian L. Erstad ◽  
John C. Sakles

2020 ◽  
pp. 102490792091063
Author(s):  
Wan Paul Weng ◽  
Nur Diana Bte Zakaria ◽  
Seow Gek Ching ◽  
Evelyn Wong

Background: To our knowledge, there has been no study comparing intubation characteristics between attending and non-attending emergency physicians in Southeast Asia. We aim to identify whether the use of direct laryngoscopy compared to video laryngoscopy affects first-pass success rates between attending emergency physicians and non-attending emergency physicians. Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis of data from 2009 to 2016 in an existing airway registry managed by an academic Emergency Department in Singapore. Primary outcome was first-pass success intubation rate. Secondary outcome was first-pass success rate for difficult intubations. Difficult intubations were defined as LEMON (Look externally, Evaluate 3-3-2 rule, Mallampati score, Obstruction, Neck mobility) score of more than 1. Results: There were a total of 2909 intubations. Attending emergency physicians conducted 1748 intubations, while non-attending emergency physicians conducted 1161 intubations. The first-pass success rates for AEP were 84.2% and 67.4% for non-attending emergency physicians. Direct laryngoscopy was used in 86.2% of intubation by attending emergency physicians compared to 89.0% in the intubation by non-attending emergency physicians. Also, 7.6% of intubations by the attending emergency physicians were difficult compared to 8.8% by the non-attending emergency physicians (p = 0.25). Logistic regression of the effect of laryngoscopy device on first-pass success in all intubations showed a negative association with video laryngoscopy (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–0.88). In the subgroup of difficult intubations, non-attending emergency physicians are 1.54 times (95% confidence interval, 0.53–4.42) as likely to have first-pass success with video laryngoscopy compared to that with direct laryngoscopy. On the contrary, in the subgroup of difficult intubations, attending emergency physicians are 0.90 times (95% confidence interval, 0.38–2.12) as likely to have first-pass success with video laryngoscopy compared to that with direct laryngoscopy. Conclusion: Our study showed that video laryngoscopy has a lower first-pass success rate for all intubations in general. Intubations performed by attending emergency physicians with direct laryngoscopy were associated with a higher first-pass success rate.


2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah Bakhsh ◽  
Ahd Alharbi ◽  
Raghad Almehmadi ◽  
Sara Kamfar ◽  
Arwa Aldhahri ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Airway management is a high-stakes procedure in emergency medicine. Continuously monitoring this procedure allows performance improvement while revealing safety issues. We instituted a quality improvement initiative in the emergency department to improve first-pass success rates in the emergency department. Methods This was a quality improvement initiative at an academic emergency department from 2018 to 2020. We developed a rapid sequence intubation guideline for procedure standardization and introduced an intubation procedure note for performance monitoring. Data were entered directly by the primary physician and nurse during intubation. The quality improvement team thereafter collected the data retrospectively and entered into a local airway database. More importantly, we introduced a culture of quality improvement and safety in airway management via regular education and feedback. Results We included a total of 146 intubations. The first-pass success rate started at 57.1% and increased to 80.0% during the study period (P &lt; 0.01). Fifty-six percent were male, and the mean age (±SD) was 55.56 (±17.64). Video laryngoscopy was used in 101 (69.2%) patients, while direct laryngoscopy was used in only 44 (30.8%) patients. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the independent factors associated with first-pass success. These factors included the use of video laryngoscopy (odds ratio (OR) 2.47 95% confidence interval (95% CI) [1.62–3.76]) (adjusted OR 3.87 [1.13–13.23]) and good Cormack–Lehane views (grades 1–2) (OR 2.71 95% CI [1.74–4.20]) (adjusted OR 7.88 [2.43–25.53]). Conclusion Our study shows that implementing and maintaining an airway quality improvement program improves first-pass intubation success. Moreover, the use of video laryngoscopy and obtaining good Cormack–Lehane views (grades 1–2) are independently associated with improved first-pass success.


EDIS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry L. Tillman

FloRunTM ‘331’ peanut variety was developed by the University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, North Florida Research and Education Center near Marianna, Florida.  It was released in 2016 because it combines high yield potential with excellent disease tolerance. FloRunTM ‘331’ has a typical runner growth habit with a semi-prominent central stem and medium green foliage.  It has medium runner seed size with high oleic oil chemistry.


EDIS ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonja C. Crawford ◽  
Christa L. Kirby ◽  
Tycee Prevatt ◽  
Brent A. Sellers ◽  
Maria L. Silveira ◽  
...  

The University of Florida / IFAS South Florida Beef Forage Program (SFBFP) is composed of county Extension faculty and state specialists.  The members, in conjunction with the UF/IFAS Program Evaluation and Organizational Development unit, created a survey in 1982, which is used to evaluate ranch management practices.  The survey is updated and distributed every 5 years to ranchers in 14 South Florida counties: Charlotte, Collier, DeSoto, Glades, Hardee, Hendry, Highlands, Hillsborough, Lee, Manatee, Martin, Okeechobee, Polk, and Sarasota.  The responses are anonymous.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document