Health Promotion and Prevention in Early Childhood: The Role of Nursing Research in Shaping Policy and Practice

Author(s):  
Deborah Gross ◽  
Angela Crowley
Pflege ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Brieskorn-Zinke

Die beiden Disziplinen Public Health und Pflege begegnen sich vorwiegend in den Arbeitsfeldern Versorgungsgestaltung und Gesundheitsförderung. Im Zuge neuerer Entwicklungen von Public Health in den deutschsprachigen Ländern sind auch pflegerische Ansätze zur Gesundheitsförderung wieder bedeutungsvoller geworden. Alte und neue Ansätze stehen aber bisher relativ unverbunden nebeneinander. In diesem Artikel wird eine Systematisierung möglicher Arbeitsfelder und entsprechender Interventionsstrategien vorgenommen und zur Diskussion gestellt. Hervorgehoben wird die Gesundheitsförderung in der Pflege differenziert nach einem verhaltensbezogenen Ansatz (Kompetenzförderung auf verschiedenen pflegerischen Ebenen) und einem verhältnisbezogenen Ansatz, in welchem die Förderung sozialer Unterstützung, die gemeindebezogene Gesundheitsförderung sowie Gesundheitsförderung in anderen Settings thematisiert werden.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faith Lamb-Parker ◽  
John W. Hagen ◽  
Joan Lombardi ◽  
John Easton ◽  
David R. Harris ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 102 (9) ◽  
pp. 1688-1696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamila B. Mistry ◽  
Cynthia S. Minkovitz ◽  
Anne W. Riley ◽  
Sara B. Johnson ◽  
Holly A. Grason ◽  
...  

Psychology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 06 (07) ◽  
pp. 880-884
Author(s):  
Danielle Freitas Alvim de Castro ◽  
Anna Maria Chiesa ◽  
Lislaine Aparecida Fracolli ◽  
Lívia Keismanas Ávila

Author(s):  
Kara R. Skelton ◽  
Chenery Lowe ◽  
Daniel A. Zaltz ◽  
Sara E. Benjamin-Neelon

Abstract Background Garden-based interventions show promise for improving not only child nutrition, but other indicators of child health. Yet, existing systematic reviews of garden-based interventions often focus on one particular health outcome or setting, creating a need to holistically summarize review-level evidence on the role of garden-based interventions in early childhood. To fill this gap, we performed an umbrella review of garden-based interventions to examine their role in early childhood health promotion for children ages 6 years and younger, examining effective components of garden-based interventions and critically evaluating existing evidence. Methods We searched the following databases: PubMed, PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, OVID-Agricola, and CAB Direct, limiting to reviews published from 1990 to August 2019. Of the 9457 references identified, we included a total of 16 unique reviews for analysis. Results Across reviews, garden based-interventions were most effective at improving nutrition-related outcomes for children, including nutritional status and fruit and vegetable consumption. Few reviews examined child health outcomes of garden-based interventions that were not nutrition related, such as physical activity, or academic performance. Across settings, there was the most evidence in support of garden-based interventions conducted in home gardens, compared to evidence from early care and education or community settings. We were unable to report on most effective components of garden-based interventions due to limitations of included reviews. Conclusions Existing evidence is difficult to interpret due to methodological limitations at both the review and primary study level. Therefore, the lack of evidence for certain child health outcomes should not necessarily be interpreted as an absence of an effect of garden-based interventions for specific outcomes, but as a product of these limitations. Given the breadth of evidence for garden-based interventions to improve a number of dimensions of health with older children and adult populations, we highlight areas of future research to address evidence gaps identified in this umbrella review. Further research on the role of garden-based interventions, including their impact on non-nutrition early childhood health outcomes and how effectiveness differs by setting type is necessary to fully understand their role in early childhood health promotion. PROSPERO registration CRD42019106848.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celeste E. van Rinsum ◽  
Sanne M. P. L. Gerards ◽  
Geert M. Rutten ◽  
Ien A. M. van de Goor ◽  
Stef P. J. Kremers

Background. The role of health broker is a relatively new one in public health. Health brokers aim to create support for efforts to optimise health promotion in complex or even “wicked” public health contexts by facilitating intersectoral collaborations and by exchanging knowledge with different stakeholders. The current study aimed to explore the role of health brokers, by examining the motivational, contextual, and behaviour-related factors they have to deal with. Methods. Fifteen professionals from various backgrounds and from various policy and practice organisations were recruited for a semistructured interview. To structure the interviews, we developed the “Health Broker Wheel” (HBW), a framework we then specified with more details derived from the interviews. Results. We identified seven primary types of behaviour that health brokers need to engage in: recognizing opportunities, agenda setting, implementing, network formation, intersectoral collaboration, adaptive managing, and leadership. Determinants of health brokers’ behaviours were identified and categorised as capability, opportunities, motivation, and local or national contextual factors. Conclusion. The health brokers’ role can be seen as an operational approach and is visualised in the HBW. This framework can assist further research to monitor and evaluate this role, and health promotion practitioners can use it as a tool to implement the health brokers’ role and to facilitate intersectoral collaboration.


1993 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 62 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANN JACOBSON ◽  
ELIZABETH H. WINSLOW

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document