scholarly journals Biology, chance, or history? The predictable reassembly of temperate grassland communities

Ecology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 408-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana S. Petermann ◽  
Alexander J. F. Fergus ◽  
Christiane Roscher ◽  
Lindsay A. Turnbull ◽  
Alexandra Weigelt ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josep Padullés Cubino ◽  
Irena Axmanová ◽  
Zdeňka Lososová ◽  
Martin Večeřa ◽  
Ariel Bergamini ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 22 (2/3) ◽  
pp. 235 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. C. D. Newton ◽  
H. Clark ◽  
C. C. Bell ◽  
E. M. Glasgow ◽  
K. R. Tate ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marian Koch ◽  
Birgit Schröder ◽  
Anke Günther ◽  
Kerstin Albrecht ◽  
Rudolf Pivarci ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-164
Author(s):  
Claudio Baraldi ◽  
Laura Gavioli

This paper analyses healthcare interactions involving doctors, migrant patients and ‘intercultural mediators’ who provide interpreting services. Our study is based on a collection of 300 interactions involving two language pairs, Arabic–Italian and English–Italian. The analytical framework includes conversation analysis combined with insights from social systems theory. We look at question-answer sequences, where (1) the doctors ask questions about patients’ problems or history, (2) the doctors’ questions are responded to and (3) the doctor closes the sequence, moving on to another question. We analyse the ways in which mediators help doctors design questions for patients and patients understand and eventually respond to the doctors’ design. While the doctor’s question design aims at obtaining details which are relevant for the patients’ care, it is argued that collecting such details involves complex interactional work. In particular, doctors need help in displaying their attention to their patients’ problems and in guiding patients’ responses into medically relevant directions. Likewise, patients need help in reacting appropriately. Mediators help manage communicative uncertainty both by showing the doctor’s interest in what the patient says, and by exploring and rendering the patient’s incomplete, extended and ambiguous answers to the doctor’s questions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-86
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Heyne

AbstractAlthough visual culture of the 21th century increasingly focuses on representation of death and dying, contemporary discourses still lack a language of death adequate to the event shown by pictures and visual images from an outside point of view. Following this observation, this article suggests a re-reading of 20th century author Elias Canetti. His lifelong notes have been edited and published posthumously for the first time in 2014. Thanks to this edition Canetti's short texts and aphorisms can be focused as a textual laboratory in which he tries to model a language of death on experimental practices of natural sciences. The miniature series of experiments address the problem of death, not representable in discourses of cultural studies, system theory or history of knowledge, and in doing so, Canetti creates liminal texts at the margins of western concepts of (human) life, science and established textual form.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document