IMPLICATIONS OF RIPARIAN MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ON WOOD IN STREAMS OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1212-1221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Meleason ◽  
Stanley V. Gregory ◽  
John P. Bolte
2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin W. Zobrist ◽  
Bruce R. Lippke

Abstract Riparian management is an important consideration for sustainable wood production in the Pacific Northwest. Western Washington and Oregon have similar riparian management issues but different regulatory prescriptions. Application of these prescriptions to a sample of 10 small private ownerships illustrate some of the economic differences of each state's approach. Economic costs tend to be higher in Washington but can be significant in both states. Lower cost strategies through alternate plans may be important for protecting riparian habitat while ensuring the long-term economic viability of forestry in the region.


1994 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
David B. Lindenmayer

Mr. Macfarlane and Mr. Loyn have failed to recognize the main thrust of the recent article comparing the development of management strategies for the conservation of the Northern Spotted Owl in the Pacific Northwest of the USA and Leadbeater's Possum in Central Victoria (Lindenmayer and Norton 1993). The key issue was not to compare the biology of the respective taxa; that would be nonsensical. Rather, it was to highlight that, unlike the management of Leadbeater's Possum (Macfarlane and Seebeck 1991), conservation strategies for the Northern Spotted Owl have now been developed that are ecologically defensible and scientifically valid (Murphy and Noon 1992).


2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
William W. Turechek ◽  
Walter F. Mahaffee ◽  
Cynthia M. Ocamb

Hop powdery mildew, caused by Sphaerotheca macularis, was first discovered in the Yakima Valley of Washington in 1997 and has since become the most serious disease of hop (Humulus lupus) in the Pacific Northwest. Lack of understanding of the epidemiology of S. macularis has made it difficult to develop sound management practices. Results from our field and laboratory studies suggest that control measures applied early in the growing season are probably the most important in shaping the epidemic in a particular field and that late season control measures may not need to be applied at the same intensity as in early to mid-season. Accepted for publication 9 March 2001. Published 13 March 2001.


2003 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 1363-1370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon H Reeves ◽  
Kelly M Burnett ◽  
Edward V McGarry

We compared the contribution of large wood from different sources and wood distributions among channel zones of influence in a relatively pristine fourth-order watershed in the central Coast Range of Oregon. Wood in the main stem of Cummins Creek was identified as coming from either (i) streamside sources immediately adjacent to the channel or (ii) upslope sources delivered by landslides or debris flows more than 90 m from the channel. About 65% of the number of pieces and 46% of the estimated volume of wood were from upslope sources. Streamside sources contributed about 35% of the number of pieces and 54% of the estimated volume of wood. The estimated mean volume of upslope-derived pieces was about one-third that of streamside-derived pieces. Upslope-derived pieces were located primarily in the middle stream reaches and in the zones of influence that had the most contact with the low-flow channel. Streamside-derived pieces were more evenly distributed among the examined reaches and were predominately in the influence zones that had the least contact with the low-flow channel. Our findings suggest that previous studies that examined only streamside sources of wood have limited applications when designing and evaluating riparian management approaches in landslide-prone areas. The failure to recognize the potential sources of wood from upslope areas is a possible reason for the decline of large wood in streams in the Pacific Northwest.


1987 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 599-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul L. Cohen ◽  
Paul R. Saunders ◽  
William W. Budd ◽  
Frederick R. Steiner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document