P-36: A Psychophysical Analysis on Perceptual Limitation of Motion Image Artifact Reduction Using 120Hz Displays

2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 1223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-Ting Wang ◽  
Yi-Nung Liu ◽  
Shao-Yi Chien ◽  
Yung-Hao Yang ◽  
Yi-Lin Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artifact Reduction ◽  
Image Artifact ◽  
Psychophysical Analysis ◽  
Image Artifact Reduction

Proof of concept image artifact reduction by energy-modulated proton computed tomography (EMpCT)

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 237-244
Author(s):  
Jannis Dickmann ◽  
Christina Sarosiek ◽  
Victor Rykalin ◽  
Mark Pankuch ◽  
George Coutrakon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Artifact Reduction ◽  
Concept Image ◽  
Proof Of Concept ◽  
Image Artifact ◽  
Proton Computed Tomography ◽  
Image Artifact Reduction

Zero-Shot Medical Image Artifact Reduction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Jen Chen ◽  
Yen-Jung Chang ◽  
Shao-Cheng Wen ◽  
Yiyu Shi ◽  
Xiaowei Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Image ◽  
Artifact Reduction ◽  
Image Artifact ◽  
Image Artifact Reduction

MR Imaging with Metal Artifact Reduction to Differentiate between Patients with and without Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedikt Schwaiger ◽  
Alexandra Gersing ◽  
Daniela Muenzel ◽  
Julia Dangelmaier ◽  
Peter Prodinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Mr Imaging ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Artifact Reduction ◽  
Metal Artifact ◽  
Metal Artifact Reduction ◽  
Total Hip

scholarly journals Influence of iterative reconstruction and dose levels on metallic artifact reduction: A phantom study within four CT systems

2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 269-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Greffier ◽  
A. Larbi ◽  
J. Frandon ◽  
P.A. Daviau ◽  
J.P. Beregi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Iterative Reconstruction ◽  
Phantom Study ◽  
Artifact Reduction ◽  
Metallic Artifact ◽  
Dose Levels

Comparison of metal artifact reduction techniques in magnetic resonance imaging of carbon-reinforced PEEK and titanium spinal implants

2021 ◽  
pp. 028418512110290
Author(s):  
Georg Osterhoff ◽  
Florian A Huber ◽  
Laura C Graf ◽  
Ferdinand Erdlen ◽  
Hans-Christoph Pape ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Artifact Reduction ◽  
Metal Artifact ◽  
Metal Artifact Reduction ◽  
Signal Loss ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Spinal Implants ◽  
Titanium Screws

Background Carbon-reinforced PEEK (C-FRP) implants are non-magnetic and have increasingly been used for the fixation of spinal instabilities. Purpose To compare the effect of different metal artifact reduction (MAR) techniques in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on titanium and C-FRP spinal implants. Material and Methods Rod-pedicle screw constructs were mounted on ovine cadaver spine specimens and instrumented with either eight titanium pedicle screws or pedicle screws made of C-FRP and marked with an ultrathin titanium shell. MR scans were performed of each configuration on a 3-T scanner. MR sequences included transaxial conventional T1-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences, T2-weighted TSE, and short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences and two different MAR-techniques: high-bandwidth (HB) and view-angle-tilting (VAT) with slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC). Metal artifact degree was assessed by qualitative and quantitative measures. Results There was a much stronger effect on artifact reduction with using C-FRP implants compared to using specific MRI MAR-techniques (screw shank: P < 0.001; screw tulip: P < 0.001; rod: P < 0.001). VAT-SEMAC sequences were able to reduce screw-related signal loss artifacts in constructs with titanium screws to a certain degree. Constructs with C-FRP screws showed less artifact-related implant diameter amplification when compared to constructs with titanium screws ( P < 0.001). Conclusion Constructs with C-FRP screws are associated with significantly less artifacts compared to constructs with titanium screws including dedicated MAR techniques. Artifact-reducing sequences are able to reduce implant-related artifacts. This effect is stronger in constructs with titanium screws than in constructs with C-FRP screws.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document