scholarly journals Feasibility of Cycloxydim Herbicide Application in Maize (Zea mays) Weed Control

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-115
Author(s):  
Majid Anabestani ◽  
Ebrahim Izadi-Darbandi ◽  
Mehdi Rastgoo ◽  
Mirceta Vidakovic ◽  
◽  
...  
Author(s):  
C. Supriya ◽  
P. MuraliArthanari ◽  
R. Kumaraperumal ◽  
A. P. Sivamurugan

A field experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design to screen the optimum spray fluid of herbicide application for drone based on visual toxicity and weed control efficiency in maize (Zea mays L.) during the summer season (March 2021) at eastern block farms of Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu. Three herbicide treatments namely Atrazine, Tembotrione and 2, 4-D with recommended dosages, 75% and 125% as pre-emergence herbicides applied on 3 days after, early post-emergence herbicides applied on 15 days after sowing and post-emergence applied on 25 days after sowing respectively. Totally thirty treatments with different spray fluids such as 500, 400, 300, 200, 100, 80, 60, 40, 30 L ha-1 and 20 L ha-1 were replicated three times. The study revealed that T5- Recommended dosage of pre emergence Atrazine – early post emergence Tembotrione – post emergence 2, 4-D (spray fluid 100 L of water ha-1),T6- Recommended dosage of pre emergence Atrazine – early post emergence Tembotrione–post emergence 2, 4-D (spray fluid 80 L of water ha-1), T7- Recommended dosage of pre emergence Atrazine – early post emergence Tembotrione – post emergence 2, 4-D (spray fluid 60 L of water ha-1) and T8- Recommended dosage of pre emergence Atrazine – early post emergence Tembotrione – post emergence 2, 4-D (spray fluid 40 L of water ha-1) produced the best results with respect to phytotoxicity and weed control efficiency. Based on the results it was concluded that the application of spray fluid 80 L ha-1 was optimum for herbicide application through drones with recommended dosage pre emergence Atrazine 1 kg a.i ha-1 on 3 days after sowing – early post emergence Tembotrione 120 g a.i ha-1 on 15-20 days after sowing - post emergence 2, 4-D 1 kg a.i ha-1 on 30 - 35 days after sowing.


Weed Science ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. O. Akobundu ◽  
R. D. Sweet ◽  
W. B. Duke ◽  
P. L. Minotti

Early postemergence application of atrazine [2-chloro-4- (ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine] at 0.28 kg/ha in combination with alachlor [2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl)acetanilide] at 0.42 kg/ha plus a non-toxic oil-surfactant blend gave season-long weed control in sweet corn (Zea maysL. var.rugosa‘Seneca Chief’). Bioassay with oats (Avena sativaL.) showed no detectable atrazine residue in the soil 3 months after herbicide application. In greenhouse studies, the response of Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galliL. Beauv. var.frumentacea) to early postemergence application of atrazine and alachlor combinations plus an oil-surfactant blend was synergistic. Soil uptake played a major role in the activity of the herbicides. Formulants used in commercial alachlor when added to atrazine spray, enhanced atrazine activity in a way similar to that of the non-toxic oil-surfactant.


1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 807-813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brent E. Tharp ◽  
James J. Kells

Field trials were conducted in 1996 and 1997 to determine the influence of glufosinate and glyphosate application rates, application timings, and interrow cultivation on weed control and corn yield. Glufosinate-ammonium rates ranged from 0.18 to 0.41 kg ai/ha, while rates for the isopropylamine salt of glyphosate ranged from 0.21 to 0.84 kg ae/ha. Increasing rates of glufosinate and glyphosate often improved weed control. Control of many of the weed species was improved by delaying herbicide application timing. Weed control was most consistent from late postemergence (LPOST) applications of glufosinate at 0.41 kg ai/ha or glyphosate at 0.84 kg ae/ha. Corn yields were reduced due to incomplete weed control when the lowest rate of glufosinate was applied. Weed control from early postemergence (EPOST) glufosinate and glyphosate applications followed by cultivation was similar to weed control from LPOST glufosinate and glyphosate applications without cultivation. Interrow cultivation following glufosinate or glyphosate application did not affect corn yield.


Weed Science ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 394-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Ramsel ◽  
Gail A. Wicks

An experiment involving six winter wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) cultivars, an early-April herbicide application on wheat and on four dates after wheat harvest, and the growth of a subsequently planted corn (Zea maysL.) crop was conducted at North Platte, NE. ‘Centurk 78’ suppressed barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli(L.) Beauv. # ECHCG] more than ‘Bennett’ and ‘Eagle’ in the growing wheat and after wheat harvest in July, but there were no differences in weed yield among cultivars in corn planted 11 months later. Herbicides applied to the tillering wheat in early April improved weed control in wheat and the subsequent corn crop. Also, herbicides were applied 5, 25, 45, and 300 days after wheat harvest. Weed growth increased and soil water decreased as spraying dates were delayed. Herbicides applied 5 days after harvest did not maintain adequate weed control in the corn planted 11 months after wheat harvest and low corn yield resulted. Plots receiving herbicides 300 days after wheat harvest had the least soil water in the fall after wheat harvest but the best weed control in corn and highest corn yields because of better weed control in corn.


Weed Science ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 679-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell S. Moomaw ◽  
Alex R. Martin

Weed control in no-till soybeans [Glycine max(L.) Merr. ‘Wells’] planted into shredded corn (Zea maysL.) residue was evaluated at Concord, NE, over a 3-yr period. Herbicide factors evaluated were time of herbicide application for no-till soybeans, efficacy of glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] relative to paraquat (1,1’-dimethyl-4,4’-bipyridinium ion) for control of emerged weeds, and the efficacy of alachlor [2-chloro-2’,6’-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl)acetanilide], metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide], oryzalin (3,5-dinitro-N4,N4-dipropylsulfanilamide), and pendimethalin [N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine] for residual weed control. Combination residual and contact herbicide treatments were applied either as a preplant surface application or preemergence after no-till-planted soybeans. Removal of existing weed growth was not consistently better with the preplant surface application compared to later removal after soybean planting. Paraquat and glyphosate gave nearly equal control of emerged weeds. Addition of 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] with paraquat in the tank mix did not improve weed control. Use of narrow, ripple coulters on the no-till planter resulted in minimal disturbance of the preplant surface herbicide so that additional preemergence herbicide at planting was seldom beneficial.


1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 356-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Boyd Carey ◽  
James J. Kells

Grass and broadleaf herbicides are available for effective, single-application total postemergence weed control in corn. Field experiments were conducted in 1992 and 1993 on sites with dense natural weed infestations to determine the effects of weed interference prior to herbicide application on corn yield. Nicosulfuron plus bromoxynil was applied at 5-, 10-, 15-, or 20-cm weed canopy heights in plots with or without weed interference. Crop injury was more severe when herbicides were applied to smaller corn. Herbicide applications made to 5-, 10-, or 15-cm tall weeds provided nearly complete weed control. Weed interference did not reduce corn height or grain yield when postemergence applications were made to weeds 10 cm or less in height. Weed interference reduced corn height and grain yield in 1992 when applications were made to 15-cm tall weeds even though weed control was nearly complete. Weed control was incomplete and corn height and grain yield were reduced when applications were delayed until weeds were 20 cm tall.


Weed Science ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell S. Moomaw ◽  
Alex R. Martin ◽  
Robert G. Wilson

Combinations of herbicides applied preplant incorporated and preemergence plus at layby were evaluated in corn (Zea maysL.) at three Nebraska locations in 1977 through 1980 for their effectiveness in providing season-long weed control. Pendimethalin [N-(1 -ethylpropyl) - 3,4-dimethyl - 2,6 - dinitrobenzenamine], pendimethalin + atrazine [2- chloro - 4 - (ethylamino) -6 - isopropylamino) -s- triazine ], metolachlor [2 - chloro -N- (2 - ethyl - 6 - methylphenyl) -N- (2 - methoxy -1 - methylethyl) acetamide], alachlor [2 - chloro -2′,6’ - diethyl -N- (methoxymethyl)acetanilide], cyanazine {2 -[[4 - chloro- 6 - (ethylamino) -s- triazin-2 - yl] amino] -2 -methylpropionitrile}, and cyanazine + atrazine were shown to be selective to corn and effective in controlling late - germinating weeds. Irrigated - corn yield was not increased by layby herbicide applications on the weed species and weed densities present in these experiments.


Weed Science ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fritz K. Koppatschek ◽  
Rex A. Liebl ◽  
Fred W. Slife

Field and laboratory studies were conducted in 1985 and 1986 to determine the effect of herbicide application timing and level of corn residue on metribuzin plus metolachlor for weed control in soybean. Herbicides were applied early preplant (35 days before planting), sequentially (early preplant and preemergence), or preemergence. Giant foxtail control was better with sequential application than early preplant herbicide application in both years. Control of velvetleaf, smooth pigweed, and jimsonweed was independent of application timing, except in 1986, when jimsonweed control was less from herbicides applied early preplant compared to sequentially. Metribuzin reaching the soil was less when applied to high levels of corn residue compared to low residue levels. However, corn residue level had no effect on weed control.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document