Detection of Bovine Ephemeral Fever Virus and Its Effects on Blood Parameters and Serum Calcium Levels in Cattle Population of District Swabi, Pakistan

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahibzada Waheed Abdullah ◽  
Muti Ur- Rehman Khan ◽  
Asim Aslam ◽  
Saima Masood ◽  
Amir Ghafoor Bajwa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Hematological Parameters ◽  
Blood Parameters ◽  
Fever Virus ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Bovine Ephemeral Fever Virus ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Bovine Ephemeral Fever ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Bovine ephemeral fever (BEF) is a fatal viral disease predominantly affecting cattle and buffaloes. Infection results in a huge economic loss, especially due to the reduction in milk production. In Pakistan. There is a dearth of information on bovine ephemeral fever. The study was designed to detect and examine the effect of bovine ephemeral fever virus on hematological parameters among cattle in Swabi district, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. A total of fifty blood samples were collected from suspected cattle and scrutinized for bovine ephemeral fever virus, using nested Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR). Hematological parameters were analyzed using hematology and chemistry analyzer. Of the 50 blood samples, 33 representing 66% were positive for bovine ephemeral fever virus through RT-PCR. A product size of 809 bp was observed in the reaction-I, while 505bp was obtained in reaction-II. Neutrophils of infected cattle were significantly increased (10.44 ± 1.87 × 109/L) (plessthan 0.05), with a significant decrease plessthan 0.05) in lymphocytes levels (2.90 ± 0.97 × 109/L). Changes in other blood parameters were non-significant. Furthermore, there was also a significant decrease (plessthan 0.05) in serum calcium level (7.84 ± 0.16 mg/dL). We confirmed the detection of bovine ephemeral fever virus by nested reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in Swabi, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

Prognostic Value of Circulating Melanoma Cells Detected by Reverse Transcriptase–Polymerase Chain Reaction

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 767-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Palmieri ◽  
Paolo A. Ascierto ◽  
Francesco Perrone ◽  
Sabrina M.R. Satriano ◽  
Alessandro Ottaiano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Stage Of Disease ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Purpose: Factors that are predictive of prognosis in patients who are diagnosed with malignant melanoma (MM) are widely awaited. Detection of circulating melanoma cells (CMCs) by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has recently been postulated as a possible negative prognostic factor. Two main questions were addressed: first, whether the presence of CMCs, defined as the patient being positive for any of the three markers, had a prognostic role; and second, what the predictive value of each individual marker was. Patients and Methods: A consecutive series of 200 melanoma patients observed between January 1997 and December 1997, with stage of disease ranging from I to IV, was analyzed by semiquantitative RT-PCR. Tyrosinase, p97, and MelanA/MART1 were used as markers to CMCs on baseline peripheral blood samples. Progression-free survival (PFS) was used as a unique end point and was described by the product limit method. Multivariable analysis was applied to verify whether the auspicated prognostic value of these markers was independent of the stage of disease, and a subgroup analysis was performed that excluded patients with stage IV disease. Results: Overall, 32% (64 of 200) of patients progressed, and a median PFS of 52 months in the whole series was observed. The presence of CMCs and the markers individually or combined was predictive of prognosis in the univariate analysis but did not provide additional prognostic information to the stage of disease in multivariable models. In the subgroup analysis of stage (ie, I–III subgroup), similar results were observed. Conclusion: Detection of CMCs in peripheral blood samples at the time of MM diagnosis by semiquantitative RT-PCR does not add any significant predictive value to the stage of disease. Thus, this approach should not be used in clinical practice, and further studies are required to determine its usefulness.

Impact of Molecular Staging Methods in Primary Melanoma: Reverse-Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) of Ultrasound-Guided Aspirate of the Sentinel Node Does Not Improve Diagnostic Accuracy, But RT-PCR of Peripheral Blood Does Predict Survival

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (35) ◽  
pp. 5742-5747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiane A. Voit ◽  
Gregor Schäfer-Hesterberg ◽  
Martina Kron ◽  
Alexander C.J. van Akkooi ◽  
Juergen Rademaker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Primary Melanoma ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Purpose This study analyzes (1) the value of tyrosinase reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of aspirates obtained by ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (US-FNAC) of sentinel nodes (SNs) in patients with melanoma before sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and (2) the value of RT-PCR of blood samples of all SLNB patients. Patients and Methods Between 2001 and 2003, 127 patients with melanoma (median Breslow depth, 2.1 mm) underwent SLNB. FNAC was performed in all SNs of all patients pre- and post-SLNB. The aspirates were partly shock-frozen for RT-PCR and were partly used for standard cytology. Peripheral blood was collected at the time of SLNB and at every outpatient visit thereafter. Results Thirty-four (23%) of 120 SNs were positive for melanoma. SN involvement was predicted by US-FNAC with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 72%. Additional tyrosinase RT-PCR revealed the same sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 72%. At a median follow-up time of 40 months from first blood sample, peripheral-blood RT-PCR was a significant independent predictor of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS; P < .001). Conclusion US-FNAC is highly accurate and eliminates the need for SLNB in 16% of all SLNB patients. RT-PCR of the aspirate or excised SN does not improve sensitivity or specificity. RT-PCR of blood samples predicts DFS and OS.

Interlaboratory Evaluation of a New Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction–Based Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Detection of Circulating Melanoma Cells: A Multicenter Study of the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1723-1727 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Reinhold ◽  
C. Berkin ◽  
A.-K. Bosserhoff ◽  
A. Deutschmann ◽  
C. Garbe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Melanoma Patients ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Interlaboratory Reproducibility

PURPOSE: Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)–based detection of tyrosinase mRNA is the most frequently used laboratory method for the detection of circulating tumor cells in melanoma patients. However, previously published results showed considerable variability in the PCR positivity rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed a collaborative study to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and clinical relevance of a new standardized RT-PCR–based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of circulating melanoma cells. Blood samples of healthy donors mixed with cells of a melanoma cell line were prepared in a blinded fashion, and aliquots were sent to seven participating laboratories experienced in RT-PCR. RESULTS: The results demonstrate a high sensitivity (1 melanoma cell/mL blood) and specificity (no false-negatives and 7.4% [2 of 28] false-positives) of the assay and a satisfactory rate of interlaboratory reproducibility. The analysis of aliquots of blinded samples derived from 60 melanoma patients identified tyrosinase mRNA in 17 of 60 (28.3%): three (20%) of 15 stage I patients, two (13.3%) of 15 stage II patients, five (35.7%) of 14 stage III patients, and seven (43.8%) of 16 stage IV patients. The interlaboratory reproducibility of positive samples, however, was extremely low and indicates the presence of low amounts of target mRNA. CONCLUSION: Reverse transcriptase-PCR ELISA has a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of tyrosinase mRNA in peripheral blood cells. The low interlaboratory reproducibility for the detection of tumor cells in blood samples of melanoma patients, however, raises the question of relevance of this assay for clinical use.

GeneXpert Essay for BCR-ABL Compared to RT-PCR for Clinical Management of CML

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4416-4416
Author(s):  
G. Pica ◽  
G. Catania ◽  
F. Castelli ◽  
C Repetto ◽  
A. M. Carella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Gene Fusion ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Prolymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Abstract Abstract 4416 Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is considered the most sensitive method available for detecting low copy numbers of the BCR-ABL gene fusion. The difference between the BCR-ABL Ct (threshold cycle) and ABL Ct is expected to represent the ratio of the two populations of mRNAs and ultimately the percentage of neoplastic cells present. An international scale (IS) has been proposed for BCR-ABL RQ-PCR measurements. To enable testing centers to gain access to the IS, the Adelaide laboratory initiated a process to develop and validate laboratory-specific conversion factors (CFs) that can be used to convert local values to IS values. Recently, Cepheid introduced its GeneXpert-based assay for the identification of the BCR-ABL gene fusion in cells from blood samples. This system comprises a walkaway self-contained instrument that combines cartridge- based microfluidic sample preparation with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction-based fluorescent signal detection and BCR-ABL and ABL Ct determination. The CF provided by Cepheid for this procedure is 0.47. We tested this BCR-ABL fusion detection system, compared with a classical RT-PCR analysis as a clinical diagnostic tool for CML patients. We tested 19 patient peripheral blood samples by both methods. The negative control group included 3 blood samples, obtained from 3 patients with hematological disorders unrelated to BCR-ABL gene fusion: one with essential thrombocythemia, one with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, one with T-cell-prolymphocytic leukemia. The remaining 16 clinical samples belonged to 12 patients with an established diagnosis of CML in chronic phase and to one patient with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (p210). GeneXpert software reported as negative 2 samples with a numerical threshold limit calculated on Ct (i.e. BCR-ABL was not detected at a detection limit of 0.00046%); the 3rd negative control was indicated as BCR-ABL invalid: this result was probably due to the high proportion of ABL detected as consequence of hyperleukocytosis (WBC 559,6 × 109/L) in T-Cell prolymphocytic leukemia patients. Therefore, the performance of GeneXpert test in this series was: Sensitivity 100%, Specificity 0,66%, Positive Predictive Value 100%, Negative Predictive Value 100%. Among the series of 16 true positive samples GeneXpert revealed mean 8,67; mean standard deviation 27,55; median 1,48. Whereas in the same series RT-PCR results were: mean 37,09; mean standard deviation 59,33; median 3,37. In conclusion GeneXpert essay for BCR-ABL could be an important tool for diagnose and monitor CML but require complete clinical data for the correct interpretation of results. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatic and symptomatic patients and risk for transfusion transmission

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor M. Corman ◽  
Holger F. Rabenau ◽  
Ortwin Adams ◽  
Doris Oberle ◽  
Markus B. Funk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Blood Components ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Polymerase Chain

AbstractOral swabs, sputum and blood samples from 18 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were examined using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. Whereas oral swabs or sputum from the lower respiratory tract were tested RT-PCR positive in all patients, RNAemia was neither detected in 3 patients without symptoms nor in 14 patients with flu-like symptoms, fever or pneumonia. The only patient with RNAemia suffered from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and was artificially ventilated in an intensive care unit. Risk for SARS-CoV-2 transmission through blood components in asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals therefore seems negligible but further studies are needed.

1504: Molecular Diagnosis and Staging of Prostate Cancer Using Clusterin in Real Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 485-486
Author(s):  
Sabarinath B. Nair ◽  
Christodoulos Pipinikas ◽  
Roger Kirby ◽  
Nick Carter ◽  
Christiane Fenske
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Molecular Diagnosis ◽  
Reverse Transcription ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Polymerase chain reaction amplification and typing of rotavirus in environmental samples

1995 ◽  
Vol 31 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 371-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Gajardo ◽  
R. M. Pintó ◽  
A. Bosch
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Environmental Samples ◽  
Polymerase Chain Reaction Amplification ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Group A ◽  
Reaction Amplification ◽  
Stool Specimens ◽  
Polymerase Chain

A reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay is described that has been developed for the detection and serotyping of group A rotavirus in stool specimens and concentrated and non-concentrated sewage specimens.

scholarly journals Machine Learning Prediction of SARS-CoV-2 Polymerase Chain Reaction Results with Routine Blood Tests

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Tschoellitsch ◽  
Martin Dünser ◽  
Carl Böck ◽  
Karin Schwarzbauer ◽  
Jens Meier
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Blood Tests ◽  
Routine Blood ◽  
Machine Learning Model ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Abstract Objective The diagnosis of COVID-19 is based on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory secretions, blood, or stool. Currently, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the most commonly used method to test for SARS-CoV-2. Methods In this retrospective cohort analysis, we evaluated whether machine learning could exclude SARS-CoV-2 infection using routinely available laboratory values. A Random Forests algorithm with 1353 unique features was trained to predict the RT-PCR results. Results Out of 12,848 patients undergoing SARS-CoV-2 testing, routine blood tests were simultaneously performed in 1528 patients. The machine learning model could predict SARS-CoV-2 test results with an accuracy of 86% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90. Conclusion Machine learning methods can reliably predict a negative SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test result using standard blood tests.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document