scholarly journals Pathogenic Bacteria and Drug Sensitivity Analysis of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
Qianqian Wang ◽  
Chuanhui Wang
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Tract Infection ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infection ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract Infection ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract ◽  
Pathogenic Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative

<strong>Objective: </strong>To study drug resistance of pathogenic bacteria in lower respiratory tract infection in patients in Respiratory Department of Internal Medicine. <strong>Method: </strong>On October 2011 to October 2013, there were 112 patients with lower respiratory tract infection in the hospital respiratory medicine ward were reviewed for analysis by collected patient’s infected blood, urine and sputum for laboratory analysis and investigation of drug resistance. <strong>Results: </strong>In a total of 112 strains of pathogenic bacteria, gram negative bacteria, the number of strains was 68, accounting for 60.7% of all strains. The analysis of gram positive bacteria had the lowest drug resistance to vancomycin, but the resistance to erythromycin and penicillin was the highest, while gram negative bacteria were the lowest, but the drug resistance was high. <strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Respiratory Department Of Internal Medicine, patients with lower respiratory tract infection, the pathogenic bacteria which is gram negative bacterial infection is more common, to clarify the distribution of the infection of pathogenic bacteria, and the drug resistance to do a good grasp of the lower respiratory tract infection in patients with lower respiratory tract infection in patients with the role of a thing.

scholarly journals Microbiology of lower respiratory tract infection in workers of garment industry of Kathmandu

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 14-22
Author(s):  
S Pant ◽  
KR Bhusal ◽  
S Manandhar
Keyword(s):  
Tract Infection ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infection ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract Infection ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract ◽  
Culture Media ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria

By mistake the wrong PDF was loaded for this article. The correct PDF was loaded on 19th September 2016. OBJECTIVES This study was designed with the objectives of describing the distribution pattern of microorganisms responsible for causing LRTI in the workers of garment industries.MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 198 cases of suspected person of Lower Respiratory Tract infection (LRTI) LRTI were included in this study. This study was conducted between November 2009 to April 2010. Specimen for the study was expectorated sputum. Gram-stain, Ziehl-Neelsen stains and culture were performed.RESULTS On direct microscopic examination, 20.51% were Gram positive bacteria, 79.48% were Gram negative bacteria and 4% were smear positive AFB. On culture sensitivity examination, 22% percent showed growth of different bacteria in different culture media. The bacteria isolated from the samples included Klebsiella pneumoniae (15.38%), Proteus mirabilis (15.38%) and Citrobacterfruendii (15.38%). Gram Negative bacteria were found most susceptible to Ciprofloxacin (92.30%, 24/26) and Amikacin (92.30%, 24/26). Similarly, Gram Positive bacteria were found most susceptible to Ciprofloxacin (100%, 8/8) followed by Cloxacillin and Cephalexin (87.5%, 7/8). Smear positive AFB was significantly associated with not using the protective measures (mask) by workers and presence of symptoms (cough for more than two weeks, night sweat, hemoptysis and anorexia) (p=0.031). Culture positivity was significantly associated with symptoms like production of purulent sputum (p=0.045).CONCLUSION There was insignificant association between LRTI and risk factors present in working room of garment industries. Most of the isolates were sensitive to Ciprofloxacin and resistance to Ampicillin and Cephalexin.Journal of College of Medical Sciences-Nepal, 2014, Vol-10, No-3, 14-22

scholarly journals Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Gram-negative Isolates of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakshya Nepal ◽  
Basudha Shrestha ◽  
Deepak Man Joshi ◽  
Rajesh Dhoj Joshi ◽  
Sanjit Shrestha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tract Infection ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infection ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract Infection ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract ◽  
Acinetobacter Calcoaceticus ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Beta Lactamases ◽  
Extended Spectrum ◽  
Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamases

Background:  Lower respiratory tract infection is a common cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. A crosssectional study was carried out with an objective to study the antibiogram of Gram-negative isolates of patients with lower respiratory tract infection visiting Kathmandu Model Hospital.Methods: A total of 274 specimens including sputum, endotracheal aspirates, suction tips were cultured as per standard microbiological technique. Antibiotic susceptibility and detection of Extended-spectrum beta- lactamases (ESBLs) were performed following Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI 2014) guidelines.Results: Respiratory pathogens were recovered from 24.6% (n=65) cases. Klebsiella pneumoniae (40%) was the commonest isolates. The highest prevalence of multidrug-resistance (69.23%) was observed in Acinetobacter calcoaceticus baumannii complex. Extended-spectrum beta- lactamases were detected in Escherichia coli (n=4), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=4) and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus baumannii complex (n=1).Conclusions: High prevalence of multidrug-resistance and extended- spectrum beta- lactamase producers were observed in respiratory isolates. For effective management of lower respiratory tract infections, an ultimate and detailed microbiological diagnosis and susceptibility testing is required.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Gram-Negative Bacteria Causing Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Kathmandu University Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 661-666
Author(s):  
Jatan Bahadur Sherchan ◽  
Sanjay Humagain
Keyword(s):  
Tract Infection ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infection ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
P Value ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Predisposing Factor ◽  
Gram Negative

Background: Respiratory tract infection due to Gram-negative bacteria is a common cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. This study was carried out to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Gram-negative bacteria from patients with lower respiratory tract infection visiting Kathmandu University Hospital.Methods: A total of 3,403 respiratory samples including sputum and endotracheal aspirates were processed and antibiotic resistance pattern was determined following Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines. Patients’ information was obtained after informed consent.Results: Growth of Gram-negative bacteria was 210 (6.17%). 83(39.52%) were Klebsiella pneumoniae followed by Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter species, Klebsiella oxytoca, Enterobacter species, Proteus mirabilis and Haemophilus influenzae. 151(71.90%) isolates were multidrug resistant. None of the strains were resistant to colistin. 51(24.29%) were resistant to carbapenem and out of these 3(1.43%) were metallo-? lactamase producers. 89(65.92%) of the patients having both pneumonia along with other respiratory illnesses were above 60 years of age indicating that old age might be a predisposing factor. (p value is less than 0.0001). 92(81.42%) of patients of age above 60 years had multidrug resistant isolates indicating that old age might be a predisposing factor for getting infection my multidrug resistant isolates. (p value equals 0.0012) Among 36 diabetic patients 33(91.67%) had multidrug resistant isolates. Whereas out of 174 non-diabetic patients only 118(67.82%) had multidrug resistant isolates (p value equals 0.0037).Conclusions: Multidrug-resistant Gram negative bacteria were observed in respiratory samples. Effective treatment of lower respiratory tract infection need detailed microbiological diagnosis and drug susceptibility testing.Keywords: ESBL; LRTI; MBL; MDR

scholarly journals Bacterial Profile and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Isolates Recovered from Lower Respiratory Tract Infection for Patients in Rizgary Hospital, Erbil

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-70
Author(s):  
Mahmoud A. Chawsheen ◽  
Ahmed A. Al-Naqshbandi ◽  
Haval H. Abdulqader
Keyword(s):  
Tract Infection ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infection ◽  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract Infection ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract ◽  
Pathogenic Bacteria ◽  
Antibiotic Sensitivity ◽  
Bronchial Wash ◽  
Streptococcus Parasanguinis

Recognition of etiologies of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) may help in delivering effective treatment options and circumvent emergence of antibiotic resistance. This study was carried out to uncover bacterial profile and antibiotic sensitivity patterns among 310 LRTI patients attended Rizagary Hospital between January 2014 to December 2016. Standard laboratory techniques were applied in collecting, processing, and culturing sputum and bronchial wash specimens. VITEK® 2 compact systems were used to identify bacteria and their antibiotic sensitivity patterns. Results showed that Streptococcus parasanguinis and Acinetobacter baumannii were the most abundant gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (GPB & GNB), respectively, isolated from sputum specimens. From bronchial wash specimens, only GNB were detected and Serratia marcescens was the most abundant one. Antibiotic sensitivity tests revealed that Streptococcus parasanguinis was the most resistant GPB and Acinetobacter baumannii was the most resistant GNB. Sputum recovered GPB were highly resistant to Ampicillin, Erythromycin, Levofloxacin, Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole, and Tetracycline. Bronchial wash recovered GNB were highly resistant to Ampicillin, Minocycline, Pefloxacin, Piperacillin, and Ticarcillin. In conclusion, LRTIs are mainly associated with GNB rather than GPB. The recovered Streptococcus parasanguinis and Acinetobacter baumannii were found to be multidrug-resistant pathogens. Ampicillin was ineffective against any of recovered pathogenic bacteria.

scholarly journals Bacterial causes of upper & lower respiratory tract infection in Sheep

2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Jamal Salman Ali
Keyword(s):  
Tract Infection ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Nasal Cavity ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infection ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract Infection ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract ◽  
Pathogenic Bacteria ◽  
Bacterial Species ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Hemorrhagic Lesion

This study was designed to investigate the bacterial species that induceupper and lower respiratory tract infection in sheep, and to find out anyrelationship which may exist between them.Therefore two groups of sheep were employed. The first group wassuffering from certain respiratory signs. While the second group was apparentlyhealthy. Each group included 50 sheep. Research samples were collected for aperiod of six months from AL-Shulla Abattoir.Microbiological investigation indicated the isolation of certainmicroorganisms from all animals in both groups from nasal cavity, and from 34lungs of the first group and 16 lungs of the second group. The number of isolatesfrom the nasal cavity, were 200 from different species ,43 isolates from thebronchioles and 70 from the lungs tissue. On the other hand the number ofbacterial isolates from the nasal cavity, bronchioles and the lung tissue of thefirst group were 113, 29 and 55 respectively.The study revealed the isolation of potentially pathogenic bacteria from thelower respiratory system of both groups, these bacteria were namely Pasteurellahaemolytica of serotype (A2), Niesseria spp. and Corynebacterium pyogenes,the number of isolates were 6 for each, and 8 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.These bacteria were also isolated from the nasal cavity. The isolation of thesebacteria from the nasal strongly suggested their presence in the lungs and theprobable role in lesion formation.Animal inoculation were performed to study the virulence of P.haemolytica which caused certain hemorrhagic lesion in the lung , liver andkidney, with areas of necrosis in the lungs of the experimentally inoculatedrabbit, and caused death in mice. While the inoculation of C. ovis caused thedeath of rabbits within 72 hours, together with the presence of multipleabscessation on the internal organs and abdomenal wall.Sensitivity tests indicated a high sensitivity of most isolates to Gentamicin,Erythromycin and Kanamycin.

scholarly journals Microbiota of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Samples from Patients of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection – A Changing Trend

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhanashree P. Inamdar ◽  
B. Anuradha ◽  
Padmanabh Inamdar ◽  
Poojitha Sai Patti
Keyword(s):  
Tract Infection ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Bronchoalveolar Lavage ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infection ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract Infection ◽  
Diagnostic Tool ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Sensitivity Pattern ◽  
Tract Infections

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is the saline wash of the bronchial tree, which aids in diagnosing various pulmonary pathologies. The present study was contemplated with an aim to know the clinical, microbiological profile of BAL samples along with its sensitivity pattern and to assess its utility as a diagnostic tool. This was a prospective observational study, carried over 90 patients presenting with lower respiratory tract infections. The total microbial recovery rate from BAL was 39 (43.3%). The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of BAL were found to be 76.4%, 89.7% and 90.6% respectively. Maximum isolates were bacteria (25.5%) followed by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) (16.6%) and fungi (1.1%). Predominant bacterial isolates were Gram-negative (81.5%) compared to Gram-positive (18.5%). Multidrug resistance (MDR) in bacteria was seen in 59.2% of isolates. BAL is a valuable diagnostic tool to find not only bacterial but mycobacterial and fungal infections in patients with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). A trend towards LRTI with Gram-negative infections is on the rise and they tend to be multidrug-resistant. Hence checking susceptibility patterns is crucial to start evidence-based treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document