scholarly journals Nomograms for predicting Gleason upgrading in a contemporary Chinese cohort receiving radical prostatectomy after extended prostate biopsy: development and internal validation

Oncotarget ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (13) ◽  
pp. 17275-17285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biming He ◽  
Rui Chen ◽  
Xu Gao ◽  
Shancheng Ren ◽  
Bo Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Internal Validation ◽  
Chinese Cohort ◽  
Contemporary Chinese

scholarly journals Predicting Gleason sum upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy pathology: a new nomogram and its internal validation

BMC Urology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaochuan Wang ◽  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Fengbo Zhang ◽  
Zhengguo Ji ◽  
Peiqian Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Receiver Operating Curve ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Internal Validation ◽  
Prostate Imaging ◽  
T Stage ◽  
Predictive Probabilities ◽  
Chinese Cohort ◽  
Good Calibration

Abstract Background To explore the rate of Gleason sum upgrading (GSU) from biopsy to radical prostatectomy pathology and to develop a nomogram for predicting the probability of GSU in a Chinese cohort. Methods We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained prostate cancer (PCa) database from October 2012 to April 2020. 198 patients who met the criteria were enrolled. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors. Nomogram was constructed based on independent predictors. The receiver operating curve was undertaken to estimate the discrimination. Calibration curve was used to assess the concordance between predictive probabilities and true risks. Results The rate of GSU was 41.4%, whilst GS concordance rate was 44.4%. The independent predictors are prostate specific antigen (PSA), greatest percentage of cancer (GPC), clinical T-stage and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score. Our model showed good discrimination (AUC of 0.735). Our model was validated internally with good calibration with bias-corrected C-index of 0.726. Conclusions Utilization of basic clinical variables (PSA and T-stage) combined with imaging variable (PI-RADS) and pathological variable (GPC) could improve performance in predicting actual probabilities of GSU in the 24-core biopsy scheme. Our nomogram could help to assess the true risk and make optimal treatment decisions for PCa patients.

396: Does a Prostate Biopsy Scheme with a Saturation Technique Improve the Cancer grade, stage and Margin status more Accurately at the Time of Radical Prostatectomy ?

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 132-132
Author(s):  
Stephane Mallick ◽  
Yann Fouques ◽  
Sophie Le Toquin ◽  
Antoine Dufour ◽  
Henri Bensadoun
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Margin Status

1607: Gleason Score Migration between Prostate Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 435-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish A. Vira ◽  
John E. Tomaszewski ◽  
Anthony V. D'Amico ◽  
Keith VanArsdalen ◽  
Alan J. Wein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Prostate Biopsy

MP20-07 ASSOCIATION OF ATROPHY IN BASELINE PROSTATE BIOPSY AND LOWER PROSTATE CANCER GRADE IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS

2017 ◽  
Vol 197 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel MO Freitas ◽  
Gerald Andriole ◽  
Ramiro Castro-Santamaria ◽  
Stephen J. Freedland ◽  
Daniel M. Moreira
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Prostate Biopsy

scholarly journals MP57-12 THE IMPACT OF INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS AFTER PROSTATE BIOPSY ON RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SURGICAL OUTCOMES: A POPULATION-BASED ANALYSIS

2016 ◽  
Vol 195 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Olvera-Posada ◽  
Blayne Welk ◽  
J. Andrew McClure ◽  
Jennifer Winick-Ng ◽  
Jonathan I. Izawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Risk of upgrading from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy pathology: Is magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy more accurate?

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (19) ◽  
pp. 3634-3639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ning Xu ◽  
Yu-Peng Wu ◽  
Xiao-Dong Li ◽  
Min-Yi Lin ◽  
Qing-Shui Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Guided Biopsy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document