scholarly journals Deep learning with deep convolutional neural network using FDG-PET/CT for malignant pleural mesothelioma diagnosis

Oncotarget ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Kitajima ◽  
Hidetoshi Matsuo ◽  
Atsushi Kono ◽  
Kozo Kuribayashi ◽  
Takashi Kijima ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Krüger ◽  
S. Pauls ◽  
Felix M. Mottaghy ◽  
Andreas K. Buck ◽  
Hubert Schelzig ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. S481-S482
Author(s):  
F. Lococo ◽  
O. Rena ◽  
F. Torricelli ◽  
A. Filice ◽  
T. Di Stefano ◽  
...  

Lung Cancer ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. S20
Author(s):  
P. Kestenholz ◽  
A. Soltermann ◽  
I. Opitz ◽  
H. Steinert ◽  
W. Weder

2009 ◽  
Vol 56 (1,2) ◽  
pp. 16-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideki Otsuka ◽  
Kaori Terazawa ◽  
Naomi Morita ◽  
Yoichi Otomi ◽  
Kyo Yamashita ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keisuke Kawauchi ◽  
Sho Furuya ◽  
Kenji Hirata ◽  
Chietsugu Katoh ◽  
Osamu Manabe ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: As the number of PET/CT scanners increases and FDG PET/CT becomes a common imaging modality for oncology, the demands for automated detection systems on artificial intelligence (AI) to prevent human oversight and misdiagnosis are rapidly growing. We aimed to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based system that can classify whole-body FDG PET as 1) benign, 2) malignant, or 3) equivocal. Methods: This retrospective study investigated 3,485 sequential patients with malignant or suspected malignant disease, who underwent whole-body FDG PET/CT at our institute. All the cases were classified into the 3 categories by a nuclear medicine physician. A residual network (ResNet)-based CNN architecture was built for classifying patients into the 3 categories. In addition, we performed region-based analysis of the CNN (head-and-neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvic region). Results: There were 1,280 (37%), 1,450 (42%), and 755 (22%) patients classified as benign, malignant and equivocal, respectively. In patient-based analysis, the CNN predicted benign, malignant and equivocal images with 99.4%, 99.4%, and 87.5% accuracy, respectively. In region-based analysis, the prediction was correct with the probability of 97.3% (head-and-neck), 96.6% (chest), 92.8% (abdomen) and 99.6% (pelvic region), respectively. Conclusion: The CNN-based system reliably classified FDG PET images into 3 categories, indicating that it could be helpful for physicians as a double-checking system to prevent oversight and misdiagnosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document