scholarly journals Biomarker analysis to predict the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer: An exploratory biomarker study of COMPASS, a randomized phase II trial

Oncotarget ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (30) ◽  
pp. 2906-2918
Author(s):  
Takashi Oshima ◽  
Takaki Yoshikawa ◽  
Yohei Miyagi ◽  
Satoshi Morita ◽  
Michio Yamamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathological Response ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Biomarker Analysis ◽  
Response To Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (FLOT) Versus S-1 plus Oxaliplatin (SOX) for Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birendra Kumar Sah ◽  
Benyan Zhang ◽  
Huan Zhang ◽  
Jian Li ◽  
Fei Yuan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathological Response ◽  
Clinicopathological Parameters ◽  
Regression Grading ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference

AbstractBackgroundDespite growing trends of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer, there is still no consensus of optimal regimens between East and West countries. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and Leucovorin (FLOT) regimen has shown promising results in terms of pathological response and survival rate. However, S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) is a more favorable chemotherapy regimen in Eastern countries. We conducted this study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of both regimens, and to explore a suitable regimen for Chinese patients.MethodsPatients with locally advanced gastric cancer(LAGC) were 1:1 randomly assigned to receive either 4 cycles of FLOT or 3 cycles of SOX regimen before curative gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was the comparison of complete or sub-total tumor regression grading (TRG1a+ TRG1b) in the primary tumor.ResultsAltogether 74 cases enrolled between August 2018 and March 2020. All 74 randomly assigned cases were considered as intention-to-treat (ITT) population, and the 55 patients who completed the planned chemotherapy plus surgery were considered as per protocol (PP) population. There was no significant difference in pre-treatment clinicopathological parameters between the FLOT and SOX group(p>0.05). There was no significant difference in adverse effects or postoperative morbidity and mortality between two groups (p>0.05). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the proportion of tumor regression grading between the FLOT and SOX group(p>0.05). In the ITT population, complete or sub-total TRG was 20.0 % in FLOT versus 32.4 % in the SOX group (p>0.05).ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that FLOT and SOX regimens are similarly effective for locally advanced gastric cancer patients in terms of clinical downstaging and pathological response. Both regimens were well-tolerated in this study. A large scale phase 3 randomized controlled trial is necessary to validate this result.

Prognostic value of response assessed by RECIST and WHO criteria to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15647-e15647
Author(s):  
S. R. Park ◽  
J. S. Lee ◽  
Y. W. Kim ◽  
I. J. Choi ◽  
K. W. Ryu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Who Criteria ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Response To Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

e15647 Background: In metastatic gastric cancer, the response to chemotherapy is assessed by RECIST or WHO criteria according to the change of tumor size. There are no data, however, on the usefulness of those criteria in evaluating tumor response in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy-as assessed by RECIST and WHO criteria-and clinical outcome in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients. Methods: This study recruited LAGC patients who, from January 2003 through November 2005, entered the neoadjuvant arm of prospective randomized phase II trials comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy to adjuvant chemotherapy. LAGC was defined as stage III or IV (M0) disease based on computed tomography (CT) according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. Patients with measurable lesions received 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel (36 mg/m2) and cisplatin (40 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, followed by surgery. Results: After chemotherapy, 40 (95%) patients underwent surgery and the remaining 2 patients showed new distant metastasis on CT scan. Thirty-five (83%) patients had curative R0 resection. Twenty-eight (67%) patients had a clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to RECIST/WHO criteria. Although R0 resection rate (93% vs 64%, P = 0.03), median relapse-free survival (RFS) (43.2 vs 7.5 months, P = 0.14), and overall survival (OS) (not reached vs 27.0 months, P = 0.10) were better in responders than non-responders, they did not differ significantly in the subgroup that subsequently underwent surgery. When we redefined the decrease in tumor size judged as a response by RECIST (≥60% rather than ≥30%) and WHO (≥75% rather than ≥50%) criteria, response correlated significantly with both RFS (P = 0.03) and OS (P = 0.02). Conclusions: In the neoadjuvant setting, which frequently involves smaller measurable lesions than the metastatic setting, larger changes in tumor size than those specified by RECIST and WHO criteria are needed to predict postoperative outcome. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II trial of S-1 combined with oxaliplatin (SOX) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 122-122
Author(s):  
L. Chen
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

122 Background: Previous phase II trial with combination therapy of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) demonstrated high response rate and well tolerability in patients with untreated advanced gastric cancer. The aim of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOX as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Methods: Eligibility criteria included a histologically proven AGC with stage IIIb, IIIc (AJCC 7th edition), at least 1 measurable lesion, no prior chemotherapy, ECOG 0∼2, adequate hepatic, renal, and bone marrow function. Enrolled patients were staged by EUS and CT. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisted of 3-4 cycles of oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) on day 1 and S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) for 14 days with 7 days rest. After chemotherapy, the patients underwent surgery. Results: From Dec 2009 to Sep 2010, 35 patients (IIIb; 19pts, IIIc; 16pts) were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 54.6 years (range; 20-72 y). All patients were available for evaluating the clinical responese and adverse events. The overall response rate was 68.5% (1CR, 23 PR, 9 SD, 2 PD). 32 patients underwent surgical resection. Of them, 27 patients underwent standard D2 surgery and 5 patients had palliative surgery. 25 patients had R0 resection. Postoperative pathological examination showed that most of the surgical patients were in T4a stage. According to Lauren classification, 71.9% patiens (23/32pts) were diffuse type, SOX showed higher respons rate (1CR, 20 PR, 2 SD, RR: 91.3%) among these patients. Major grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were anemia (5.7%), neutropenia (5.7%) and liver dysfunction (8.6%) and non-hematological toxicities were anorexia (5.7%) and vomiting (11.4%). But most of the adverse events were managable. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) showed high response rate and and R0 resection rate for locally advanced GC, especially for diffuse type patients. All the patients did not have severe toxicity during the process of chemotherapy. This is the preliminary results, and the survival benefit in locally advanced GC patients that respond to SOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy needs to be addressed by a randomized-controlled trial. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Updated results of a randomized phase II trial for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant docetaxel/cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 111-111
Author(s):  
Young Woo Kim ◽  
Keun Won Ryu ◽  
Il Ju Choi ◽  
Myeong-Cherl Kook ◽  
Young Iee Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii

111 Background: Recent phase III trials proved the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer after D2 resection, but the optimal treatment sequence remains to be determined. Here we report long-term follow up results for the randomized phase II trial comparing between neoadjuvant and adjuvant docetaxel/cisplatin (DC) chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). Methods: Patients with LAGC (stage IIIA-IV) were stratified by Japanese staging system and randomized to either neoadjuvant or adjuvant weekly DC chemotherapy in the National Cancer Center of Korea from 2003 to 2005. FDG-PET/CT screening was employed to exclude patients with metastasis. Patients randomized to neoadjuvant arm received 3 cycles of DC regimen (docetaxel 36 mg/m2 and cisplatin 40 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks), followed by surgery (D2 dissection). In adjuvant arm, patients underwent surgery, followed by 3 cycles of the same DC chemotherapy regimen. Results: Neoadjuvant arm (n=43) demonstrated higher R0 resection rate than adjuvant arm (n=44) [81% v 73%], but the difference was not statistically significant. At a median follow-up for suriving patients of 7.2 years, there were no significant differences in OS and PFS between the two arms [Log rank P=0.93 and P=0.89, respectively]. Conclusions: The timing of perioperative DC chemotherapy does not affect the overall survival of patients with LAGC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document