scholarly journals Regulation of Krüppel-Like Factor 4 (KLF4) expression through the transcription factor Yin-Yang 1 (YY1) in non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma

Oncotarget ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (22) ◽  
pp. 2173-2188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Morales-Martinez ◽  
Alberto Valencia-Hipolito ◽  
Gabriel G. Vega ◽  
Natividad Neri ◽  
Maria J. Nambo ◽  
...  
Cell Cycle ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 557-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Castellano ◽  
Elena Torrisi ◽  
Giovanni Ligresti ◽  
Ferdinando Nicoletti ◽  
Grazia Malaponte ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Szablewski Vanessa ◽  
Merindol Natacha ◽  
Ballazin Sophie ◽  
Costes-Martineau Valérie ◽  
Bonnefoy Nathalie

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 5184-5184
Author(s):  
Mario I Vega ◽  
Miriam Hernandez-Atenogenes ◽  
Alberto Valencia ◽  
Gabriel G Vega ◽  
Altagracia Maldonado-Valenzuela ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 5184 Krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) is a transcription factor expressed in a variety of tissues in humans and has been implicated in several physiologic processes including development, differentiation, and tissue homeostasis. KLF4 is a bi-functional transcription factor that can either activate or repress transcription depending on the target gene. Human KLF4 is a protein of 470 amino acids with a 55 kDa. It contains three C-terminal C2H2-type zinc fingers that bind DNA. It is divided into three separate domains, namely, an N-terminal activation domain, a central repression domain and a C-terminal DNA-binding domain. For instance, KLF4 acts as a tumor suppressor gene in several cancers (colon, gastric, esophageal, bladder, and NSCLC) or as an oncogene (laryngeal carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, ductal carcinoma of the breast). However, the role of KLF4 in hematologic malignancies is still poorly understood. Reported studies in leukemia suggested that KLF4 may be a tumor suppressor. The goal of this study was to investigate the expression and the clinical significance of KLF4 in B-Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (B-NHLs). Both B-NHL cell lines and patient-derived tumor tissues (TMA) were examined by western blot and immunohistochemistry, respectively. The expression of KLF4 was calculated based on the intensity and the percentage of the area stained, and scoring was corroborated by two pathologists. The complete absence of KLF4 expression was considered as KLF4 negative. Normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells expressed low levels of KLF4, in contrast, there was a significant overexpression of KLF4 in Ramos and Raji (Burkitt's lymphoma) and 2F7 (AIDS lymphoma) B-NHL cell lines. However, the DHL4 (DBLCL) cell line showed similar expression to normal cells. Among the 73 childhood lymphomas studied, 13/23 (57%) of lymphoblastic lymphoma, 7/20 (35%) of large B-cell lymphoma, 4/4 (100%) of anaplastic large cell lymphoma and 5/6 NHL not otherwise specified were KLF4 positive. Noteworthy, 18/18 (100%) Burkitt's lymphoma was KLF4 positive. In addition, the nuclear expression of KLF4 was significantly higher in Burkitt's lymphoma (n=18) compared to the remaining subtypes (lymphoblastic lymphoma, n=23, large B-cell lymphoma n=20 and others). All patients were treated with chemotherapy and the majority of the patients that were KLF4 positive had a stage 3–4 disease. Analysis of the EFS demonstrated that patients' tumors that were KLF4 negative had significantly higher EFS as compared to tumors that were KLF4 positive. Likewise, there was significant prolongation of survival in patients with tumors that were KLF4 negative. We suggest that the expression of KLF4 and poor response to chemotherapy may be attributed to its role in resistance via its regulation by the resistance factor Notch31. In contrast, the absence of KLF4 and good response to chemotherapy may be due to shifting p53 activity from cellular repair to cell death2. The present findings demonstrate that KLF4 may be considered as an oncogene in Burkitt's lymphoma and subsets of other types of lymphoma. The findings also suggest that the expression of KLF4 may be a potential prognostic factor, though, this need to be validated in a large cohort of patients. We propose that KLF4 may be a therapeutic target in patients with B-NHL lymphomas. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Cell Reports ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1488-1499 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Wong ◽  
Lingli Li ◽  
Sabine Jurado ◽  
Ashleigh King ◽  
Rebecca Bamford ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alina-Andreea Zimta ◽  
Diana Cenariu ◽  
Alexandru Irimie ◽  
Lorand Magdo ◽  
Seyed Mohammad Nabavi ◽  
...  

Nrf2 is a transcription factor that stimulates the expression of genes which have antioxidant response element-like sequences in their promoter. Nrf2 is a cellular protector, and this principle applies to both normal cells and malignant cells. While healthy cells are protected from DNA damage induced by reactive oxygen species, malignant cells are defended against chemo- or radiotherapy. Through our literature search, we found that Nrf2 activates several oncogenes unrelated to the antioxidant activity, such as Matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9), B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2), B-cell lymphoma-extra large (BCL-xL), Tumour Necrosis Factor α (TNF-α), and Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A). We also did a brief analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data of lung adenocarcinoma concerning the effects of radiation therapy and found that the therapy-induced Nrf2 activation is not universal. For instance, in the case of recurrent disease and radiotherapy, we observed that, for the majority of Nrf2-targeted genes, there is no change in expression level. This proves that the universal, axiomatic rationale that Nrf2 is activated as a response to chemo- and radiation therapy is wrong, and that each scenario should be carefully evaluated with the help of Nrf2-targeted genes. Moreover, there were nine genes involved in lipid peroxidation, which showed underexpression in the case of new radiation therapy: ADH1A, ALDH3A1, ALDH3A2, ADH1B, GPX2, ADH1C, ALDH6A1, AKR1C3, and NQO1. This may relate to the fact that, while some studies reported the co-activation of Nrf2 and other oncogenic signaling pathways such as Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3K), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and Notch1, other reported the inverse correlation between Nrf2 and the tumor-promoter Transcription Factor (TF), Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB). Lastly, Nrf2 establishes its activity through interactions at multiple levels with various microRNAs. MiR-155, miR-144, miR-28, miR-365-1, miR-93, miR-153, miR-27a, miR-142, miR-29-b1, miR-340, and miR-34a, either through direct repression of Nrf2 messenger RNA (mRNA) in a Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1)-independent manner or by enhancing the Keap1 cellular level, inhibit the Nrf2 activity. Keap1–Nrf2 interaction leads to the repression of miR-181c, which is involved in the Nuclear factor kappa light chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) signaling pathway. Nrf2’s role in cancer prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy is still in its infancy, and the future strategic planning of Nrf2-based oncological approaches should also consider the complex interaction between Nrf2 and its various activators and inhibitors.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Armin Rehm ◽  
Marcel Gätjen ◽  
Kerstin Gerlach ◽  
Florian Scholz ◽  
Angela Mensen ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4298-4298
Author(s):  
Yi Gu ◽  
Carmelita J. Alvares ◽  
Aparna C. Jasti ◽  
Michael Jansen ◽  
Judy Bean ◽  
...  

Abstract An increasing number of Rho GTPase family proteins have been demonstrated to play critical roles in blood and immune cell development and function. The newly defined RhoH gene has been previously demonstrated to be mutated in lymphoma samples (Dallery et al, 1995; Pasqualucci et al, 2001). These alterations include chromosomal rearrangements and a high frequency of somatic mutations (up to 46%) in human non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The RhoH gene encodes a novel hematopoietic-specific member of the RhoE subfamily, which is GTPase deficient, remaining in the active, GTP-bound state. Thus the activity of RhoH is likely regulated by the level of the protein expressed in the cell. The somatic mutations in the RhoH gene have been mapped to a 1.6kb hypermutable region in the intron 1, suggesting the possibility of dysregulated RhoH expression. However, levels of RhoH expression have not been directly measured in these hematopoietic tumors and so it remains unclear whether these mutations translate into aberrant RhoH expression. We utilized quantitative real-time RT-PCR to measure RhoH transcript levels in primary DLBCL patient samples. Based on morphologic and immunophenotypic analysis, 17 DLBCL positive samples and 14 normal control samples were used for our study. The levels of TATA-box binding protein (TBP) and human phosphogycerate kinase (HPGK) cDNAs were also examined simultaneously for relative expression normalization. RhoH transcript levels in a subset of the DLBCL samples were markedly reduced. In particular, 6 of 17 (~35%) tested samples showed a greater than 3-fold reduction in RhoH expression based on both RhoH/TBP and RhoH/HPGK ratios when compared with the median RhoH expression level of 14 normal samples. Overall, RhoH expression levels of the DLBCL group were significantly altered (mainly decreased) as compared with those of the normal group (p < 0.04, student T-test). To further determine correlation of the abnormal RhoH expression with somatic mutations in the hypermutable region of the RhoH gene in the DLBCL samples, we performed genomic PCR amplification and sequencing analysis of this region from the normal and DLBCL samples. In addition, we utilized a computational approach (Trafac - http://trafac.cchmc.org) to identify evolutionarily conserved putative transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) between human and other species in the hypermutable region. 13 conserved TFBS between human and mouse were identified in the hypermutable region. Mutations in the DLBCL patients are localized in 6 of these predicted TFBS, including pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1 (PDX1), zinc-finger binding protein-89 (ZBP-89), lymphoid enhancer factor 1 (LEF-1), BRIGHT, engrailed 1 and myelin transcription factor 1 (MyT1). Interestingly, LEF-1 and BRIGHT are B cell-specific transcription activators. These results suggest that RhoH expression is frequently altered in 35–40% of DLBCL samples and mutations in the hypermutable region of the RhoH gene in several cases encompass core binding sequences of transcription factors important in B cell development.


Oncogene ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (48) ◽  
pp. 6937-6947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Zhong ◽  
L Jiang ◽  
H Hiai ◽  
S Toyokuni ◽  
Y Yamada

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document