scholarly journals [68Ga]pentixafor for CXCR4 imaging in a PC-3 prostate cancer xenograft model - comparison with [18F]FDG PET/CT, MRI and ex vivo receptor expression

Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (56) ◽  
pp. 95606-95619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah M. Schwarzenböck ◽  
Jan Stenzel ◽  
Thomas Otto ◽  
Heike V. Helldorff ◽  
Carina Bergner ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 695-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio Jiménez-Bonilla ◽  
Remedios Quirce ◽  
Ignacio Banzo ◽  
Isabel Martínez-Rodríguez ◽  
José Manuel Carril

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (9) ◽  
pp. 975
Author(s):  
Alberto Miceli ◽  
Mattia Riondato ◽  
Francesca D’Amico ◽  
Maria Isabella Donegani ◽  
Nataniele Piol ◽  
...  

Here we report the case of concomitant favorable-risk prostate cancer and Hodgkin Lymphoma in a 38-year old male. 68Ga-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen-11 Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT) was performed for staging purposes, showing the focal PSMA prostatic uptake as well as the presence of enlarged low-PSMA expressing mediastinal lymphadenopathies, thus raising the suspicion of another malignancy. A subsequent 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT demonstrated a high FDG-avidity by mediastinal lymphadenopathies as opposed to the low prostate cancer FDG uptake. Of note, both tumor entities were clearly detected by the two scans. However, different ranges in terms of Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) uptake allowed the discrimination between the two tumor entities. At the subsequent mediastinal lymph nodal biopsy, the coexistence of Hodgkin lymphoma was documented. The present case suggests that even if specific for prostate cancer, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT may raise the suspicion of other concurrent malignancies thanks to its non-receptor bounding mechanism. Further, it shows that in certain cases, the combination of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging may non-invasively guide the clinical management, optimizing the diagnostic process and the subsequent therapeutic interventions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. e148-e150
Author(s):  
Paula Fernández-Rodríguez ◽  
Juan José Martín-Marcuartu ◽  
Irene Acevedo Báñez ◽  
José Manuel Masero Carretero ◽  
José Manuel Jiménez-Hoyuela García

2018 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Liu ◽  
Qi lian Ran ◽  
Shi liang Zhou ◽  
Tao Jiang ◽  
Zhen Su ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. E318-20
Author(s):  
Anne Couture ◽  
Mounsif Azizi ◽  
Daniel Taussky ◽  
Michael McCormack

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) is a widely used diagnostic tool for whole-body imaging, and incidental prostatic uptake occurs in approximately 1% of patients undergoing the exam. Is 18F-FDG PET/CT a reliable screening tool for prostate cancer? Should these patients undergo transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsies? Studies have indicated that 18F-FDG PET/CT has a low positive predictive value for prostate cancer and is not recommended for screening;1 however, other studies suggest that when a discrete focal 18F-FDG uptake is discovered without coincidental calcification, particularly in the peripheral zone of the prostate, further clinical evaluation is recommended. We present two patients with incidental 18F-FDG PET/CT prostatic uptake who were found to have high-grade prostate cancer. Although 18F-FDG PET/CT has not been determined to be a reliable screening tool for prostate cancer, patients with incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the prostate should be referred for urological evaluation.


2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-146
Author(s):  
Masato Shiiba ◽  
Keiichi Ishihara ◽  
Go Kimura ◽  
Tomoyuki Kuwako ◽  
Hisashi Yoshihara ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 441-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salma Meziou ◽  
Cassandra Ringuette Goulet ◽  
Hélène Hovington ◽  
Véronique Lefebvre ◽  
Étienne Lavallée ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document