scholarly journals The efficiency and safety of high-dose vitamin C in patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study

Aging ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 7020-7034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dengfeng Gao ◽  
Min Xu ◽  
Gang Wang ◽  
Jianrui Lv ◽  
Xiaorong Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Vitamin C ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Vitamin

Evaluation of salivary catalase, vitamin C, and alpha-amylase in smokers and non-smokers: a retrospective cohort study

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 377-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Ahmadi-Motamayel ◽  
Parisa Falsafi ◽  
Mohammad Taghi Goodarzi ◽  
Jalal Poorolajal
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Vitamin C ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Alpha Amylase

scholarly journals Lasting s-ketamine block of spreading depolarizations in subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study

Critical Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar Santos ◽  
Arturo Olivares-Rivera ◽  
Sebastian Major ◽  
Renán Sánchez-Porras ◽  
Lorenz Uhlmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Poisson Model ◽  
High Dose ◽  
First Line

Abstract Objective Spreading depolarizations (SD) are characterized by breakdown of transmembrane ion gradients and excitotoxicity. Experimentally, N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonists block a majority of SDs. In many hospitals, the NMDAR antagonist s-ketamine and the GABAA agonist midazolam represent the current second-line combination treatment to sedate patients with devastating cerebral injuries. A pressing clinical question is whether this option should become first-line in sedation-requiring individuals in whom SDs are detected, yet the s-ketamine dose necessary to adequately inhibit SDs is unknown. Moreover, use-dependent tolerance could be a problem for SD inhibition in the clinic. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of 66 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) from a prospectively collected database. Thirty-three of 66 patients received s-ketamine during electrocorticographic neuromonitoring of SDs in neurointensive care. The decision to give s-ketamine was dependent on the need for stronger sedation, so it was expected that patients receiving s-ketamine would have a worse clinical outcome. Results S-ketamine application started 4.2 ± 3.5 days after aSAH. The mean dose was 2.8 ± 1.4 mg/kg body weight (BW)/h and thus higher than the dose recommended for sedation. First, patients were divided according to whether they received s-ketamine at any time or not. No significant difference in SD counts was found between groups (negative binomial model using the SD count per patient as outcome variable, p = 0.288). This most likely resulted from the fact that 368 SDs had already occurred in the s-ketamine group before s-ketamine was given. However, in patients receiving s-ketamine, we found a significant decrease in SD incidence when s-ketamine was started (Poisson model with a random intercept for patient, coefficient − 1.83 (95% confidence intervals − 2.17; − 1.50), p < 0.001; logistic regression model, odds ratio (OR) 0.13 (0.08; 0.19), p < 0.001). Thereafter, data was further divided into low-dose (0.1–2.0 mg/kg BW/h) and high-dose (2.1–7.0 mg/kg/h) segments. High-dose s-ketamine resulted in further significant decrease in SD incidence (Poisson model, − 1.10 (− 1.71; − 0.49), p < 0.001; logistic regression model, OR 0.33 (0.17; 0.63), p < 0.001). There was little evidence of SD tolerance to long-term s-ketamine sedation through 5 days. Conclusions These results provide a foundation for a multicenter, neuromonitoring-guided, proof-of-concept trial of ketamine and midazolam as a first-line sedative regime.

Low-Dose Versus High-Dose Radiation Therapy for the Palliation of Dysphagia From Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. e255-e263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bram D. Vermeulen ◽  
Paul M. Jeene ◽  
Jasmijn Sijben ◽  
Robin Krol ◽  
Heidi Rütten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Dose Radiation

Pegfilgrastim Versus Filgrastim To Accelerate Hematopoietic Recovery after High Dose Melphalan and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) for Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 5193-5193
Author(s):  
Rebecca L. Olin ◽  
Selina M. Luger ◽  
David L. Porter ◽  
Stephen J. Schuster ◽  
Donald Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Median Number ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematopoietic Recovery ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Abstract High-dose melphalan followed by ASCT is a common component of the early treatment for patients with multiple myeloma. Daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim (Neupogen) at 5 ug/kg/day until ANC &gt; 500/ul are routinely administered at our center from day +4 following ASCT, in order to accelerate hematopoietic recovery and lessen neutropenic complications. Pegfilgrastim (Neulasta) as a single 6 mg fixed dose subcutaneous injection has been shown to have similar efficacy and ease of use when compared to filgrastim in the non-transplant setting, but little data is available in the transplant setting. We began using pegfilgrastim day +1 following ASCT for patients with multiple myeloma and performed a retrospective cohort study comparing those who received filgrastim (n=6) with those who received pegfilgrastim (n=11). Transplants occurred between July 2002 and January 2004 and included all patients transplanted for myeloma in that time period for whom sufficient data was available. All patients had at least 2 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg peripheral stem cells harvested after cytoxan and filgrastim mobilization. Main outcome measures were: days from stem cell infusion to WBC nadir, days to ANC&gt;500/ul, and days to ANC&gt;1000/ul. Subjects were excluded if CBCs were drawn less frequently than every four days. There were no significant differences between the filgrastim and pegfilgrastim groups with respect to the following demographic variables: age, gender, hemoglobin, creatinine, calcium, albumin and beta-2 microglobulin at diagnosis. The groups were also balanced with respect to SPEP, UPEP, presence of lytic lesions and number of prior lines of therapy. The median number of CD34+ cells infused was similar: 5.7 x 106 in the filgrastim group vs 4.8 x 106 in the pegfilgrastim group (p=0.28). After transplant, median number of days to WBC nadir in the filgrastim group (FG) was 7 (range 5–9) vs 6 (range 5–8) in the pegfilgrastim group (PG) (p=0.31). However, median number of days to ANC&gt;500/ul in the FG was 11.5 (range 11–17) vs 10 (range 9–12) for PG (p=0.02). Similarly, median number of days to ANC&gt;1000/ul was 12 (range 11–17) for FG vs 11 (range 10–13) for PG (p=0.03). Five of six patients in the FG had neutropenic fever after transplant, compared to five of eleven patients in the PG (p=0.30). Currently, no significant differences in infection or relapse rates between groups have been noted and there were no deaths in either group. In this retrospective cohort study, pegfilgrastim was safe and at least equivalent to filgrastim for accelerating hematopoiesis after ASCT for multiple myeloma. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the incidence of neutropenic fever, infection and survival, suggesting a similar clinical utility.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document