scholarly journals Evaluation of the effects of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on weight loss

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emre Gündoğdu ◽  
Celal İsmail Bilgiç ◽  
Münevver Moran ◽  
Cem Emir Güldoğan ◽  
Evren Dilektaşlı ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Gastric Banding ◽  
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding ◽  
Adjustable Gastric Banding

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band: Complications, Removal and Revision in a Portuguese Highly Differentiated Obesity Treatment Center

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo Mendes-Castro ◽  
Joana Montenegro ◽  
Jorge Félix Cardoso ◽  
Gisela Simões ◽  
Catarina Ferreira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Gastric Banding ◽  
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Adjustable Gastric Banding ◽  
Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band ◽  
Treatment Center

<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> Our objective is to determine which complications lead to reoperation, and the outcomes of reoperation using laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at Centro Hospitalar de São João.<br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> Observational study. Patients included were aged 18 to 65 years at first gastric banding, underwent removal from March 21st 2007 to January 23rd 2014 and were subsequently converted to gastric banding, gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy. Women who got pregnant during the initial gastric banding follow-up and patients that performed more than one conversion were excluded.<br /><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 103 patients were included. Fifteen underwent revision to gastric banding, 71 to gastric bypass and 17 to sleeve gastrectomy. Respectively, percentage of excess weight loss at 1 month were 1.9 ± 12.2% in 6 patients, 36.9 ± 18.2% in 49 patients and 27.1% (13.3 - 68.6) in 11 patients (laparoscopic adjustable-gastric banding-laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass p &lt; 0.001, laparoscopic adjustable-gastric banding-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy p = 0.002 and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy p = 0.474). At 3 months there were 12.8% (5.7 - 84.8) in 6 patients, 44.8 ± 19.7% in 24 patients and 48 ± 20.1% in 8 patients (laparoscopic adjustable-gastric banding-laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass p = 0.017, laparoscopic adjustable-gastric banding-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy p = 0.039 and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy p = 0.691).<br /><strong>Discussion:</strong> At revision, ages and body mass indices are higher than other studies. Gastric bypass is the preferred revision surgery, because combines restriction and malabsorption, surgeons have more experience and long term outcomes are better described.<br /><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The main indications for reoperation were inadequate weight loss (37.4%) and band slippage (30%). At short term, in our patients, gastric banding as a revision surgery was not effective, as opposed to gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.</p>

scholarly journals Ten-Year Results of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Retrospective Matched Comparison with Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding—Is There a Significant Difference in Long Term?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Musella ◽  
Giovanna Berardi ◽  
Nunzio Velotti ◽  
Vincenzo Schiavone ◽  
Antonio Vitiello
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Gastric Banding ◽  
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding ◽  
Adjustable Gastric Banding ◽  
Removal Rate ◽  
Bariatric Procedure ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Matched Comparison

Abstract Background The laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most common bariatric procedure performed worldwide while the laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) has been almost abandoned. Aim of this study was to retrospectively assess 10-year outcomes of LSG through a matched comparison with LAGB. Materials and Methods Retrospective search of prospectively maintained database of our university was carried out to find all patients that underwent LSG before December 2010. Each subject with LSG was matched one-to-one with a patient that had undergone LAGB in the same period with correspondent preoperative age, BMI, and sex. Results A total of 76 patients underwent LSG before 2010 and were all included in this study; a matched group of 76 out of 178 LAGB patients with 10-year follow-up was retrieved from our database. Comparison between the two groups showed better outcomes after LSG at 1 and 5 years but weight loss was comparable with the LAGB group at 10 years (%TWL 22.2 ± 13 vs 21.2 ± 16.1; p = 0.89). No significant difference was found in conversion/removal rate (15.8% vs 18.4%; p = 0.67). Conclusion LSG is an effective stand-alone bariatric procedure with better outcomes than LAGB in medium term, but results are comparable at 10 years. Subjects undergoing LSG should be informed that conversion to RYGB or OAGB may be necessary to achieve further weight loss or to treat reflux. Graphical abstract

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document