scholarly journals Problems and ways to implement innovative complexation of geological and geophysical studies in the late stages of field development

Georesursy ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 28-34
Author(s):  
E.B. Grunis ◽  
◽  
S.L. Barkov ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-61
Author(s):  
Mehdi Zouari ◽  
Maria Perez ◽  
Jianxiong Chen ◽  
Allison Kimbrough ◽  
Lauren Salathe ◽  
...  

A second seismic monitor survey acquired after nine years of production at Holstein Field was used successfully to define new wellbore sidetracks to target unswept areas in two of the main producing reservoirs (J2 and K1). The asset team and the technology group worked together to investigate the quality and interpretability of the 4D signal between the first and second monitor surveys. The method consisted of conducting a quality check of the acquisition and processing steps, modeling the amplitude variation with offset responses using existing wells to determine the response to fluid effects, and finally extracting and creating amplitude difference maps between monitor surveys for each reservoir. The interpretation of the 4D amplitude differences, combined with the analysis of production and pressure data from historical injector and producer wells, resulted in the decision to target what was interpreted to be a partially swept J2/K1 reservoir compartment by the aquifer in the southern part of the field. Well #12 was drilled in that target and encountered oil pay in both reservoirs, with low levels of water saturation. Another J2 area in the northern part of the field was interpreted to have remained partially unswept by water injectors, although seismic acoustic softening over that portion of the field suggested that it was still benefiting from injection pressure support. Well #11 was drilled in that northern portion of the field and encountered an oil-bearing reservoir with water saturation near preproduction levels and a reservoir pressure approaching original reservoir pressure, hence confirming repressurization.


1997 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 1185-1204 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Coveas ◽  
S. T. Milner ◽  
W. B. Russel
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (01) ◽  
pp. 36-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Chládek ◽  
V. Havlas ◽  
T. Trc

SummaryThe treatment of femoral head necrosis of adults is still rather problematic. Conservative treatment has been reported relatively unsuccessful and surgical treatment does not show convincing results either. The most effective seems to be a surgical treatment in early stages of the disease, however, the diagnosis still remains relatively complicated. For the late stages (2B and above) the most effective treatment option is represented by core decompression and vascular grafting. However, drilling and plombage (especially when using press-fit technique) seems to be successful, although not excellent. The authors describe their own method of drilling and plombage of the necrotic zone of the femoral head in 41 patients with X-ray detected necrotic changes of the femoral head. The pain measured by VAS was seen to decrease after surgery in all patients significantly. The Jacobs score was also observed to have increased (from fair to good outcome). We have not observed any large femoral head collapse after surgery, moreover, in some cases an improvement of the round shape of the femoral head was seen. It is important to mention that in all cases femoral heads with existing necrotic changes (flattening or collapse) were treated. Although the clinical improvement after surgery was not significantly high, the method we describe is a safe and simple method of diminishing pain in attempt to prepare the femoral head for further treatment in a future, without significant restriction of the indication due to necrosis (osteochondroplasty, resurfacing, THR).


Author(s):  
N.А. Eremin ◽  
◽  
A.D. Chernikov ◽  
O.N. Sardanashvili ◽  
V.E. Stolyarov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document