scholarly journals Instrumented Trial Prosthesis for Intraoperative Measurements of Joint Reaction Forces during Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 1989
Author(s):  
Masaru Higa ◽  
Chih-Chiang Chang ◽  
Christopher Roche ◽  
Aimee M. Struk ◽  
Kevin W. Farmer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Joint Reaction Forces ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder ◽  
Joint Reaction

Adaptation of the AnyBody™ Musculoskeletal Shoulder Model to the Nonconforming Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Context

2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauranne Sins ◽  
Patrice Tétreault ◽  
Nicola Hagemeister ◽  
Natalia Nuño
Keyword(s):  
Contact Area ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Humeral Head ◽  
Inverse Dynamics ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Strong Support ◽  
Joint Reaction Forces ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Joint Reaction

Current musculoskeletal inverse dynamics shoulder models have two limitations to use in the context of nonconforming total shoulder arthroplasty (NC-TSA). First, the ball and socket glenohumeral (GH) joint simplification avoids any humeral head translations. Second, there is no contact at the GH joint to compute the contact area and the center of pressure (COP) between the two components of NC-TSA. In this paper, we adapted the AnyBody™ shoulder model by introducing humeral head translations and contact between the two components of an NC-TSA. Abduction in the scapular plane was considered. The main objective of this study was to adapt the AnyBody™ shoulder model to a NC-TSA context and to compare the results of our model (translations, COP, contact area, GH joint reaction forces (GH-JRFs), and muscular forces) with previous numerical, experimental, and clinical studies. Humeral head translations and contact were successfully introduced in our adapted shoulder model with strong support for our findings by previous studies.

Complication and revision rates after reverse total shoulder revision from hemiarthroplasty: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 175857322110193
Author(s):  
Arjun K Reddy ◽  
Jake X Checketts ◽  
B Joshua Stephens ◽  
J Michael Anderson ◽  
Craig M Cooper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Revisional Surgery ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Common Complication ◽  
Humeral Component ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

Background Thus, the purpose of the present study was to (1) characterize common postoperative complications and (2) quantify the rates of revision in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty revisional surgery. We hypothesize that hardware loosenings will be the most common complication to occur in the sample, with the humeral component being the most common loosening. Methods This systematic review adhered to PRISMA reporting guideline. For our inclusion criteria, we included any study that contained intraoperative and/or postoperative complication data, and revision rates on patients who had undergone revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty due to a failed hemiarthroplasty. Complications include neurologic injury, deep surgical site infections, hardware loosening/prosthetic instability, and postoperative fractures (acromion, glenoid, and humeral fractures). Results The study contained 22 studies that assessed complications from shoulders that had revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty from a hemiarthroplasty, with a total sample of 925 shoulders. We found that the most common complication to occur was hardware loosenings (5.3%), and of the hardware loosenings, humeral loosenings (3.8%) were the most common. The revision rate was found to be 10.7%. Conclusion This systematic review found that revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed hemiarthroplasty has a high overall complication and reintervention rates, specifically for hardware loosening and revision rates.

Assessment of glenoid baseplate initial micromotion and fixation strength in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty designs using a direct shear force methodology

2021 ◽  
pp. 175857322110329
Author(s):  
Therese E Parr ◽  
Jennifer K Anderson ◽  
Alan M. Marionneaux ◽  
John M Tokish ◽  
Stefan J Tolan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Shear Force ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Fixation Strength ◽  
Shoulder Prosthesis ◽  
Direct Shear ◽  
Device Failure ◽  
Glenoid Baseplate ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

Background In a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, the altered glenohumeral joint center of rotation subjects the glenoid baseplate to increased shear forces and potential loosening. Methods This study examined glenoid baseplate micromotion and initial fixation strength with the application of direct shear force in a Sawbone model. The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty systems examined were the DJO Reverse® Shoulder Prosthesis, the Exactech Equinoxe® Reverse System, and the Tornier AequalisTM Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis. Specimens were cyclically tested with increasing shear loads until 150 µm of displacement between the implant and glenoid was achieved, and subsequently until failure, classified as either 1 cm of implant/glenoid displacement or fracture. Results The average load withstood for the 150 µm threshold for DJO, Tornier, and Exactech was 460 ± 88 N, 525 ± 100 N, and 585 ± 160 N, respectively. The average total load at device failure for DJO, Tornier, and Exactech was 980 ± 260 N, 1260 ± 120 N, and 1350 ± 230 N, respectively. Discussion The Exactech implant design trended toward requiring more load to induce micromotion at each threshold and to induce device failure, most commonly seen as inferior screw pull out. This study proposes design features that may enhance fixation and suggests little risk of initial micromotion or failure during initial post-operative recovery.

Scapular and Humeral Elevation Coordination Patterns Used Before vs. After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
pp. 110550
Author(s):  
Antonia M. Zaferiou ◽  
Christopher B. Knowlton ◽  
Suk-Hwan Jang ◽  
Bryan M. Saltzman ◽  
Nikhil N. Verma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Coordination Patterns ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

The role of the subscapularis tendon in a lateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: repair versus nonrepair

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 2579-2586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edoardo Franceschetti ◽  
Edoardo Giovannetti de Sanctis ◽  
Riccardo Ranieri ◽  
Alessio Palumbo ◽  
Michele Paciotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Subscapularis Tendon ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document