scholarly journals Development and beta test of a smokeless tobacco cessation program for firefighters

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (April) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Nattinee Jitnarin ◽  
Walker Poston ◽  
Sara Jahnke ◽  
Christopher Haddock ◽  
Herbert Severson
1995 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
V J Stevens ◽  
H Severson ◽  
E Lichtenstein ◽  
S J Little ◽  
J Leben

2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 482-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Akers ◽  
Judith S. Gordon ◽  
Judy A. Andrews ◽  
Maureen Barckley ◽  
Edward Lichtenstein ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 2154-2166
Author(s):  
Christine Makosky Daley ◽  
Charley Lewis ◽  
Niaman Nazir ◽  
Sean M. Daley ◽  
Ryan Goeckner ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 332-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. John Fisher ◽  
Herbert H. Severson ◽  
Steven Christiansen ◽  
Chris Williams

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Akers ◽  
Judy A. Andrews ◽  
Edward Lichtenstein ◽  
Herbert H. Severson ◽  
Judith S. Gordon

Introduction. Partner behaviors and attitudes can motivate and encourage, or conversely undermine, a tobacco user’s cessation efforts. Previous partner support interventions for tobacco cessation have largely focused on positive and negative behaviors. We developed a theoretically based intervention (UCare) for women who wanted their male partner to quit smokeless tobacco, based on perceived partner responsiveness--the finding that support is best received when the supporter conveys respect, understanding, and caring.Methods. We recruited 1,145 women and randomized them to receive either immediate access to the UCare website and printed booklet (Intervention), or to a Delayed Treatment control. We assessed supportive behaviors and attitudes at baseline and six-week follow-up, and the ST-using partner's abstinence at six weeks and 7.5 months (surrogate report).Results. For partners of women assigned to Intervention, 7.0% had quit all tobacco at 7.5 months, compared with 6.6% for control (n.s.). For partners of women completing the intervention, 12.4% had quit all tobacco at 7.5 months, compared with 6.6% for Delayed Treatment (p<.01). Change in responsiveness-based behaviors and instrumental behaviors at six weeks mediated 7.5-month cessation, and change in responsiveness-based attitudes mediated the change in responsiveness-based behaviors, indirectly increasing cessation.Conclusions. A responsiveness-based intervention with female partners of male smokeless tobacco users improved supportive attitudes and behaviors, leading to higher cessation rates among tobacco users not actively seeking to quit. The study demonstrates the potential for responsiveness as a basis for effective intervention with supporters, and this approach may reach tobacco users who would not directly seek help.


2018 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Mehrotra ◽  
SuzanneTanya Nethan ◽  
DhirendraNarain Sinha ◽  
Kumar Chandan

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruwan Duminda Jayasinghe ◽  
PR Jayasooriya ◽  
H Amarasinghe ◽  
PVKS Hettiarachchi ◽  
BSMS. Siriwardena ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Prevalence of smoking in Sri Lanka shows a gradual reduction whilst the use of smokeless tobacco and areca nut shows an increasing trend. At present adequate numbers of smokeless tobacco / areca nut cessation counseling programs are not being carried out in Sri Lanka. As the Dental surgeons could play a significant role in smokeless tobacco / areca nut cessation activities, capacity building programmes for dental surgeons on smokeless tobacco/ areca nut control were carried out. The study was planned to evaluate the knowledge, attitude and practices related to smokeless tobacco/ areca nut control among dental surgeons.Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted. Two questionnaires were used to assess the improvement of knowledge and change of attitudes following programmes on smokeless tobacco / areca nut control. Results: There were 663 participants in the study. 27.1% of them had received formal tobacco cessation training in the past. Majority had a good knowledge on harmful effects of smokeless tobacco but not on areca nut. Their knowledge on the current legislation on smokeless tobacco control in Sri Lanka and carcinogenicity of areca nut was not satisfactory. Almost all agreed that proper counseling leads to patient quitting the habit, a formal training is necessary to conduct tobacco control activities and it should be the part of the regular treatment modalities. More than 80% of the Dental surgeons believed that they should support strict legislation. Almost 50% agreed on tobacco and areca nut free environment in their dental clinics. Most important factors leading to poor involvement in tobacco cessation activities were lack of expertise and inadequate educational material, not breach of patient privacy and lack of financial incentives. Surprisingly, 20.1% of the dental surgeons had consumed smokeless tobacco / areca nut products in the past and only a few were current users of tobacco and/or areca nut. Conclusions: Well planned workshops are efficient and cost effective in improving knowledge, practices and attitudes of Dental surgeons towards smokeless tobacco / areca nut cessation.


2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 332-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian G. Danaher ◽  
Edward Lichtenstein ◽  
Judy A. Andrews ◽  
Herbert H. Severson ◽  
Laura Akers ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document