scholarly journals Hybrid CNN Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis System for Choroidal Neovascularization, Diabetic Macular Edema, Drusen Disease Detection from OCT Images

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 673-679
Author(s):  
Seda Arslan Tuncer ◽  
Ahmet Çınar ◽  
Murat Fırat
Keyword(s):  
Neural Networks ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Choroidal Neovascularization ◽  
Convolutional Neural Networks ◽  
Eye Diseases ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Imaging Method ◽  
Cad System ◽  
Computer Aided

In the treatment of eye diseases, optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a medical imaging method that displays biological tissue layers by taking high resolution tomographic sections at the micron level. It has an important role in the diagnosis and follow-up of many diseases such as Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV), Diabetic Macular Edema (DME), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), Diabetic Retinopathy, Central Serous Retinopathy, Epiretinal Membrane, and Macular Hole. Computer-Aided Diagnostic (CAD) tools are needed in early detection and treatment monitoring of such eye diseases. In this paper, a hybrid Convolutional Neural Networks-based CAD system, which can classify Diabetic Macular Edema (DME), Drusen Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV), and normal OCT images, is proposed. The proposed system is CNN-SVM (Convolutional Neural Networks – Support Vector Machine) model and doesn’t require any additional extraction of feature or noise filtering on OCT images. A total of 968 OCT images is classified in pre-trained CNN methods with Alexnet, Resnet18 and Googlenet. Accuracy is achieved with highest Googlenet 97.4%. To examine the performance of the proposed CAD system, the CNN-SVM method achieves 98.96% with the highest accuracy hybrid Alexnet-SVM model, which is implemented with Alexnet-SVM, Resnet18-SVM and Googlenet-SVM models.

Pretrained Convolutional Neural Networks Perform Well in a Challenging Test Case: Identification of Plant Bugs (Hemiptera: Miridae) Using a Small Number of Training Images

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Knyshov ◽  
Samantha Hoang ◽  
Christiane Weirauch
Keyword(s):  
Neural Networks ◽  
Convolutional Neural Networks ◽  
Training Image ◽  
Species Level ◽  
Identification Accuracy ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Test Case ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Lower Accuracy ◽  
Neural Network Classifiers

Abstract Automated insect identification systems have been explored for more than two decades but have only recently started to take advantage of powerful and versatile convolutional neural networks (CNNs). While typical CNN applications still require large training image datasets with hundreds of images per taxon, pretrained CNNs recently have been shown to be highly accurate, while being trained on much smaller datasets. We here evaluate the performance of CNN-based machine learning approaches in identifying three curated species-level dorsal habitus datasets for Miridae, the plant bugs. Miridae are of economic importance, but species-level identifications are challenging and typically rely on information other than dorsal habitus (e.g., host plants, locality, genitalic structures). Each dataset contained 2–6 species and 126–246 images in total, with a mean of only 32 images per species for the most difficult dataset. We find that closely related species of plant bugs can be identified with 80–90% accuracy based on their dorsal habitus alone. The pretrained CNN performed 10–20% better than a taxon expert who had access to the same dorsal habitus images. We find that feature extraction protocols (selection and combination of blocks of CNN layers) impact identification accuracy much more than the classifying mechanism (support vector machine and deep neural network classifiers). While our network has much lower accuracy on photographs of live insects (62%), overall results confirm that a pretrained CNN can be straightforwardly adapted to collection-based images for a new taxonomic group and successfully extract relevant features to classify insect species.

DermaDL: Advanced Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Skin-Lesion Classification

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Lima ◽  
Jose F. Rodrigues-Jr ◽  
Bruno Brandoli ◽  
Lorraine Goeuriot ◽  
Sihem Amer-Yahia
Keyword(s):  
Neural Networks ◽  
Skin Lesion ◽  
Convolutional Neural Networks ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Lesion Classification

COMPARISON OF SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES AND BAYESIAN NEURAL NETWORKS PERFORMANCE FOR BREAST TISSUES USING GEOSTATISTICAL FUNCTIONS IN MAMMOGRAPHIC IMAGES

2010 ◽  
Vol 09 (04) ◽  
pp. 271-288
Author(s):  
GERALDO BRAZ JUNIOR ◽  
LEONARDO DE OLIVEIRA MARTINS ◽  
ARISTÓFANES CORREA SILVA ◽  
ANSELMO CARDOSO PAIVA
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Neural Networks ◽  
Region Of Interest ◽  
Female Breast Cancer ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Risk Minimization ◽  
Bayesian Neural Network ◽  
Cad System ◽  
Mammographic Images ◽  
Breast Tissues

Female breast cancer is a major cause of deaths in occidental countries. Computer-aided Detection (CAD) systems can aid radiologists to increase diagnostic accuracy. In this work, we present a comparison between two classifiers applied to the separation of normal and abnormal breast tissues from mammograms. The purpose of the comparison is to select the best prediction technique to be part of a CAD system. Each region of interest is classified through a Support Vector Machine (SVM) and a Bayesian Neural Network (BNN) as normal or abnormal region. SVM is a machine-learning method, based on the principle of structural risk minimization, which shows good performance when applied to data outside the training set. A Bayesian Neural Network is a classifier that joins traditional neural networks theory and Bayesian inference. We use a set of measures obtained by the application of the semivariogram, semimadogram, covariogram, and correlogram functions to the characterization of breast tissue as normal or abnormal. The results show that SVM presents best performance for the classification of breast tissues in mammographic images. The tests indicate that SVM has more generalization power than the BNN classifier. BNN has a sensibility of 76.19% and a specificity of 79.31%, while SVM presents a sensibility of 74.07% and a specificity of 98.77%. The accuracy rate for tests is 78.70% and 92.59% for BNN and SVM, respectively.

Convolutional Neural Networks in Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps and Cancer: A Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamyab Keshtkar
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Neural Networks ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Computer Aided Diagnosis ◽  
Colorectal Polyps ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Training Process ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Conventional Models ◽  
Aided Diagnosis

As a relatively high percentage of adenoma polyps are missed, a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) tool based on deep learning can aid the endoscopist in diagnosing colorectal polyps or colorectal cancer in order to decrease polyps missing rate and prevent colorectal cancer mortality. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is a deep learning method and has achieved better results in detecting and segmenting specific objects in images in the last decade than conventional models such as regression, support vector machines or artificial neural networks. In recent years, based on the studies in medical imaging criteria, CNN models have acquired promising results in detecting masses and lesions in various body organs, including colorectal polyps. In this review, the structure and architecture of CNN models and how colonoscopy images are processed as input and converted to the output are explained in detail. In most primary studies conducted in the colorectal polyp detection and classification field, the CNN model has been regarded as a black box since the calculations performed at different layers in the model training process have not been clarified precisely. Furthermore, I discuss the differences between the CNN and conventional models, inspect how to train the CNN model for diagnosing colorectal polyps or cancer, and evaluate model performance after the training process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document