A FIRST- AND SECOND-ORDER TURBULENCE MODELS IN HYDROGEN NON-PREMIXED FLAM

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 27-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Oumrani ◽  
M. Aouissi ◽  
A. Bounif ◽  
B. Yssaad ◽  
F. Tabet ◽  
...  
Atmosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 564
Author(s):  
Hong Shen ◽  
Longkun Yu ◽  
Xu Jing ◽  
Fengfu Tan

The turbulence moment of order m (μm) is defined as the refractive index structure constant Cn2 integrated over the whole path z with path-weighting function zm. Optical effects of atmospheric turbulence are directly related to turbulence moments. To evaluate the optical effects of atmospheric turbulence, it is necessary to measure the turbulence moment. It is well known that zero-order moments of turbulence (μ0) and five-thirds-order moments of turbulence (μ5/3), which correspond to the seeing and the isoplanatic angles, respectively, have been monitored as routine parameters in astronomical site testing. However, the direct measurement of second-order moments of turbulence (μ2) of the whole layer atmosphere has not been reported. Using a star as the light source, it has been found that μ2 can be measured through the covariance of the irradiance in two receiver apertures with suitable aperture size and aperture separation. Numerical results show that the theoretical error of this novel method is negligible in all the typical turbulence models. This method enabled us to monitor μ2 as a routine parameter in astronomical site testing, which is helpful to understand the characteristics of atmospheric turbulence better combined with μ0 and μ5/3.


2005 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 1645-1651 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. M. Canuto ◽  
Y. Cheng ◽  
A. M. Howard

Abstract It has been known for three decades that in the case of buoyancy-driven flows the widely used second-order closure (SOC) level-2.5 turbulence models exhibit divergences that render them unphysical in certain domains. This occurs when the dimensionless temperature gradient Gh (defined below) approaches a critical value Gh(cr) of the order of 10; thus far, the divergences have been treated with ad hoc limitations of the typewhere τ is the eddy turnover time scale, g is the gravitational acceleration, α is the coefficient of thermal expansion, T is the mean potential temperature, and z is the height. It must be noted that large eddy simulation (LES) data show no such limitation. The divergent results have the following implications. In most of the ∂T/∂z < 0 portion of a convective planetary boundary layer (PBL), a variety of data show that τ increases with z, −∂T/∂z decreases with z, and Gh decreases with z. As one approaches the surface layer from above, at some zcr (∼0.2H, H is the PBL height), Gh approaches Gh(cr) and the model results diverge. Below zcr, existing models assume the displayed equation above. Physically, this amounts to artificially making the eddy lifetime shorter than what it really is. Since short-lived eddies are small eddies, one is essentially changing large eddies into small eddies. Since large eddies are the main contributors to bulk properties such as heat, momentum flux, etc., the artificial transformation of large eddies into small eddies is equivalent to underestimating the efficiency of turbulence as a mixing process. In this paper the physical origin of the divergences is investigated. First, it is shown that it is due to the local nature of the level-2.5 models. Second, it is shown that once an appropriate nonlocal model is employed, all the divergences cancel out, yielding a finite result. An immediate implication of this result is the need for a reliable model for the third-order moments (TOMs) that represent nonlocality. The TOMs must not only compare well with LES data, but in addition, they must yield nondivergent second-order moments.


2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Ask ◽  
Lars Davidson

The case investigated is the flow past a generic side mirror mounted on a flat plate at the Reynolds number of ReD=5.2×105 based on the mirror diameter. The present work studies both flow and acoustic sources by evaluating two second-order advection schemes, different levels of turbulence modeling, and three different grids. The advection schemes discussed in the present study are a second-order upwind scheme and a monotonic central scheme. The turbulence models investigated cover three levels of modeling. These are the original formulation of the detached eddy simulation (DES) model, the Smagorinsky–Lilly sub-grid scale (SGS) model with near-wall damping, and a dynamic Smagorinsky model. The different grids are as follows: a primary grid where all parameter studies are conducted and a second grid with significantly higher wake resolution and to some extent also increased plate resolution, while maintaining the resolution at the front side of the mirror. The final grid uses a significantly higher plate resolution and a wake resolution similar to that of grid two, but a comparably lower mirror front side resolution as compared with the two other grids. The general outcome of this work is that the estimation of the grid cutoff frequency through a relation of the velocity fluctuation and the grid size matches both the experimental results and trend lines perfectly. Findings from the flow field show that the horseshoe vortex in front of the mirror causes pressure fluctuations with a magnitude exceeding the maximum levels at the rear side of the mirror. Its location and unsteady properties are perfectly captured in the final simulation as compared with the experiments conducted by Daimler–Chrysler. A laminar separation at the front side of the mirror is more or less found for all wall resolved cases except the DES simulation. The third grid fails to predict this flow feature, but it is shown that this effect has no significant effect on either the static pressure sensors at the mirror surface or at the dynamic sensors located downstream of the mirror. The simulation also supports the fundamental frequency based on the eddy convection in the mirror shear layer, which is shown to be twice as high as the frequency peak found in the lateral force spectra.


1989 ◽  
Vol 209 ◽  
pp. 591-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles G. Speziale ◽  
Nessan Mac Giolla Mhuiris

A comparison of several commonly used turbulence models (including the K–ε model and three second-order closures) is made for the test problem of homogeneous turbulent shear flow in a rotating frame. The time evolution of the turbulent kinetic energy and dissipation rate is calculated for these models and comparisons are made with previously published experiments and numerical simulations. Particular emphasis is placed on examining the ability of each model to predict equilibrium states accurately for a range of the parameter Ω/S (the ratio of the rotation rate to the shear rate). It is found that none of the commonly used second-order closure models yield substantially improved predictions for the time evolution of the turbulent kinetic energy and dissipation rate over the somewhat defective results obtained from the simpler K–ε model for the unstable flow regime. There is also a problem with the equilibrium states predicted by the various models. For example, the K–ε model erroneously yields equilibrium states that are independent of Ω/S while the Launder, Reece & Rodi model and the Shih-Lumley model predict a flow relaminarization when Ω/S > 0.39 - a result that is contrary to numerical simulations and linear spectral analyses, which indicate flow instability for at least the range 0 [les ] Ω/S [les ] 0.5. The physical implications of the results obtained from the various turbulence models considered herein are discussed in detail along with proposals to remedy the deficiencies based on a dynamical systems approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document