scholarly journals Using Small Groups To Promote Active Learning And Student Satisfaction In A Required Engineering Ethics Course

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Ware ◽  
Charles F. Yokomoto
Keyword(s):  
Active Learning ◽  
Student Satisfaction ◽  
Small Groups ◽  
Engineering Ethics ◽  
Ethics Course

Pengembangan Paket Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 115
Author(s):  
Supardi Supardi
Keyword(s):  
Active Learning ◽  
Small Groups ◽  
Instructional Strategy ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Learning Activities ◽  
Learning Tools ◽  
State Institute ◽  
Training And Education ◽  
Islamic Studies ◽  
Is Research

This research is aimed at developing active learning tools to improve the effectiveness of the instructional strategy lectures at the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education of State Institute for Islamic Studies (FITK IAIN) Mataram. The method of this research is research and development (R&D) that was started with the process of needs assessment, the design of prototype of active learning tools that were tested in the next process by meansof expert validation, one to one, small groups, whole class, and effectiveness trials. The result of the trials on the developed product showed that its use had been effectively improved the students contribution during teaching and learning activities if compared to the students contribution in conventional learning process.

scholarly journals Active Learning: Subtypes, Intra-Exam Comparison, and Student Survey in an Undergraduate Biology Course

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 185
Author(s):  
Kristen M. McGreevy ◽  
Frank C. Church
Keyword(s):  
Active Learning ◽  
Student Satisfaction ◽  
Student Perceptions ◽  
Student Perception ◽  
Positive Trend ◽  
Student Survey ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Undergraduate Biology ◽  
Student Comprehension ◽  
Course Material

Active learning improves undergraduate STEM course comprehension; however, student comprehension using different active learning methods and student perception of active learning have not been fully explored. We analyze ten semesters (six years) of an undergraduate biology course (honors and non-honors sections) to understand student comprehension and student satisfaction using a variety of active learning methods. First, we describe and introduce active learning subtypes. Second, we explore the efficacy of active learning subtypes. Third, we compare student comprehension between course material taught with active learning or lecturing within a course. Finally, we determine student satisfaction with active learning using a survey. We divide active learning into five subtypes based on established learning taxonomies and student engagement. We explore subtype comprehension efficacy (median % correct) compared to lecture learning (median 92% correct): Recognition (100%), Reflective (100%), Exchanging (94.1%), Constructive (93.8%), and Analytical (93.3%). A bivariate random intercept model adjusted by honors shows improved exam performance in subsequent exams and better course material comprehension when taught using active learning compared to lecture learning (2.2% versus 1.2%). The student survey reveals a positive trend over six years of teaching in the Perceived Individual Utility component of active learning (tau = 0.21, p = 0.014), but not for the other components (General Theoretical Utility, and Team Situation). We apply our findings to the COVID-19 pandemic and suggest active learning adaptations for newly modified online courses. Overall, our results suggest active learning subtypes may be useful for differentiating student comprehension, provide additional evidence that active learning is more beneficial to student comprehension, and show that student perceptions of active learning are positively changing.

scholarly journals Development of Engineering Ethics Course

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Bairaktarova ◽  
Demetra Evangelou
Keyword(s):  
Engineering Ethics ◽  
Ethics Course

Comparing the Efficacy of Flipped vs. Alternative Active Learning in a College Genetics Course

2016 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 471-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Mennella
Keyword(s):  
Active Learning ◽  
Student Satisfaction ◽  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Additional Benefit ◽  
Learning Goals ◽  
Flipped Learning ◽  
Pedagogical Approach ◽  
Content Mastery ◽  
Class Time ◽  
Initial Instruction

Active learning is known to be a key component of student engagement and content mastery. Flipped learning is a pedagogical approach that moves passive, initial instruction out of the classroom (usually as recorded videos) and reserves class time for active-learning exercises that fortify learning. Reports have demonstrated the success of flipped learning, but it is unclear whether that success is due to students watching videos at home (i.e., the “flipped” structure of the flipped classroom) or to the active learning that takes place in class. I sought to answer that question by comparing two sections of sophomore-level college genetics. One section was flipped and the other taught traditionally, but with extensive active learning included as homework. Student satisfaction, performance on quizzes and exams, and overall achievement of course learning goals were compared. Interestingly, after taking into account the diversity of academic strength in both sections, there was no difference between the sections for any of the measured parameters. Although flipped learning may offer no additional benefit over other forms of active learning, it is far easier and more efficient to embed and integrate active learning into a flipped classroom.

An Active Learning Approach for Teaching Undergraduate Heat Transfer

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael B. Pate
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Student Engagement ◽  
Active Learning ◽  
Small Groups ◽  
Learning Approach ◽  
Novel Method ◽  
Lecture Time

A novel method for teaching undergraduate heat transfer by using an active learning approach is presented. The method focuses on minimizing lecture time and maximizing student engagement. Learning is achieved by forming small groups of two to three students who then work on in-class graded assignments.

Do Technological Advancements Lead to Learning Enhancements?: An Exploration in Virtual Product Dissection

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth M. Starkey ◽  
Cailyn Spencer ◽  
Kevin Lesniak ◽  
Conrad Tucker ◽  
Scarlett R. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Active Learning ◽  
Student Satisfaction ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Engineering Students ◽  
Learning Assessment ◽  
Immersive Virtual Reality ◽  
Engineering Programs ◽  
Educational Benefits ◽  
The Impact

Recent shifts into larger class sizes and online learning have caused engineering educators to rethink the way they integrate inductive, or active learning activities into their courses. One way engineering educators have done this is through the integration of new technological environments. However, little is known about how the type of technological environment utilized in active learning exercises impacts student learning and satisfaction. Thus, as a first step to understanding the impact of technological advancements on student learning and satisfaction, a study was conducted with 18 senior level undergraduate engineering students who were asked to perform product dissection, or the systematic disassembly of a product, using three technological interfaces (computer, iPad, immersive virtual reality). Variations in the complexity of the product dissected were also explored. The results of this study indicate that variations in technological interfaces did not impact student learning as assessed by a Student Learning Assessment (SLA). However, the complexity of the product dissected did impact learning, with students scoring significantly lower on the SLA when dissecting the most complex product. The results also indicated that students perceived learning and satisfaction were highest when using the immersive virtual reality system. These results suggest that the costs of investing in more technological advanced systems for product dissection may not yet outweigh the educational benefits. However, the increase in student satisfaction with VR environments has the potential to positively impact student retention in engineering programs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document