scholarly journals Module and Kemp Instructional Design Approaches to Integrate STEM Issues and Public Policy into Data Science Curricula at a Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander-serving Institution

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rylan Chong ◽  
Helen Turner ◽  
Mark Speck
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Instructional Design ◽  
Data Science ◽  
Native Hawaiian ◽  
Pacific Islander ◽  
Science Curricula

Crossing Intersections: Challenges Facing Asian American, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Youth: Exploring Issues and Recommendations

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 4-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben de Guzman ◽  
Alice Hom
Keyword(s):  
Asian American ◽  
Sexual And Reproductive Health ◽  
Life Stories ◽  
Native Hawaiian ◽  
Pacific Islander ◽  
Policy Recommendations ◽  
Lack Of Information ◽  
The Everyday ◽  
Bisexual And Transgender ◽  
Race Ethnicity

The experiences and the everyday life stories of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) youth who are also Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) are not well-known or documented in the literature about LGBT or AANHPI communities. To help address this lack of information and knowledge, this article highlights some of the issues that these youth face and offers recommendations regarding data collection, cultural competency, and utilization of an intersectional lens of race/ethnicity and sexual orientation to ensure changes will be considered to policies that affect these populations. The policy recommendations focus on issues such as bullying and sexual and reproductive health.

Prostate Cancer Disparities in Risk Group at Presentation and Access to Treatment for Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders: A Study With Disaggregated Ethnic Groups

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhav Jain ◽  
Kenrick Ng ◽  
Patricia Mae G. Santos ◽  
Kekoa Taparra ◽  
Vinayak Muralidhar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Asian Indian ◽  
Asian American ◽  
Native Hawaiian ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Pacific Islander ◽  
Pacific Islanders ◽  
Native Hawaiians ◽  
High Risk Disease

PURPOSE We identified (1) differences in localized prostate cancer (PCa) risk group at presentation and (2) disparities in access to initial treatment for Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) men with PCa after controlling for sociodemographic factors. METHODS We assessed all patients in the National Cancer Database with localized PCa with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease who identified as Thai, White, Asian Indian, Chinese, Vietnamese, Korean, Japanese, Filipino, Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, Laotian, Pakistani, Kampuchean, and Hmong. Multivariable logistic regression defined adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% CI of (1) presenting at progressively higher risk group and (2) receiving treatment or active surveillance with intermediate- or high-risk disease, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. RESULTS Among 980,889 men (median age 66 years), all AANHPI subgroups with the exception of Thai (AOR = 0.84 [95% CI, 0.58 to 1.21], P > .05), Asian Indian (AOR = 1.12 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.25], P > .05), and Pakistani (AOR = 1.34 [95% CI, 0.98 to 1.83], P > .05) men had greater odds of presenting at a progressively higher PCa risk group compared with White patients (Chinese AOR = 1.18 [95% CI, 1.11 to 1.25], P < .001; Japanese AOR = 1.36 [95% CI, 1.26 to 1.47], P < .001; Filipino AOR = 1.37 [95% CI, 1.29 to 1.46], P < .001; Korean AOR = 1.32 [95% CI, 1.18 to 1.48], P < .001; Vietnamese AOR = 1.20 [95% CI, 1.07 to 1.35], P = .002; Laotian AOR = 1.60 [95% CI, 1.08 to 2.36], P = .018; Hmong AOR = 4.07 [95% CI, 1.54 to 10.81], P = .005; Kampuchean AOR = 1.55 [95% CI, 1.03 to 2.34], P = .036; Asian Indian or Pakistani AOR = 1.15 [95% CI, 1.07 to 1.24], P < .001; Native Hawaiians AOR = 1.58 [95% CI, 1.38 to 1.80], P < .001; and Pacific Islanders AOR = 1.58 [95% CI, 1.37 to 1.82], P < .001). Additionally, Japanese Americans (AOR = 1.46 [95% CI, 1.09 to 1.97], P = .013) were more likely to receive treatment compared with White patients. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that there are differences in PCa risk group at presentation by race or ethnicity among Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander subgroups and that there exist disparities in treatment patterns. Although AANHPI are often studied as a homogenous group, heterogeneity upon subgroup disaggregation underscores the importance of further study to assess and address barriers to PCa care.

Tobacco use among native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander youth in the U.S. and USAPI: a systematic review of the literature

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Mistie Hokulani Rosario ◽  
Dixie L. Johnson ◽  
Kelsey S. Manglallan ◽  
Kristina T. Phillips ◽  
Pallav Pokhrel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Tobacco Use ◽  
Native Hawaiian ◽  
Pacific Islander ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
The U.S

OncotypeDx scores according to race/ethnicity and age in a diverse cohort of breast cancer patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12512-e12512
Author(s):  
Eileen Chen ◽  
Corinne Jones ◽  
Ian Pagano ◽  
Jami Aya Fukui
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
White Women ◽  
Native Hawaiian ◽  
Breast Cancer Incidence ◽  
Pacific Islander ◽  
Oncotype Dx ◽  
Age At Diagnosis ◽  
Similar Distribution ◽  
Incidence And Mortality ◽  
Race Ethnicity

e12512 Background: Breast cancer incidence and mortality rate differ across racial/ethnic populations in the US, but little is known about the relationship between Oncotype DX scores and race/ethnicity. Oncotype DX scores are used in early stage, hormone positive breast cancers to estimate the likelihood of breast cancer recurrence and benefit from receiving chemotherapy. Most available literature assesses disparities between race and receipt of an Oncotype DX score, with only some assessing distribution of scores by race. Populations previously studied mainly focus on Black compared to White women, with very few including Asian and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander subpopulations. When included, they are often grouped together as Asian/Pacific Islander. Current studies suggest there is a similar distribution of scores among Black and White women, but some studies report that Black women may be more likely to have high-risk scores. Methods: We examined 476 unique breast cancer cases in the Hawaii Pacific Health system diagnosed in 2018-2020. We used univariable and multivariable analyses on all of those cases that received an Oncotype DX score to determine correlation to age and race. Results: In 328 breast cancer cases that received an Oncotype DX score, age of diagnosis ranged from 29 to 84 with race/ethnicity including Japanese (n = 90, 27%), White (n = 78, 24%), Filipino (n = 54, 17%), Native Hawaiian (n = 52, 16%), Chinese (n = 24, 7%), and other (n = 30, 9%) populations. Cases with age at diagnosis between 60-69 (n = 118, 36%) were found to have a mean Oncotype DX score of 13.91 (CI 12.19-15.62, p = 0.04) which was statistically lower than other ages groups on both univariable and multivariable analysis. We found no other significant relationships between Oncotype DX score and race or age at diagnosis on our analyses. Conclusions: These findings contribute more information about Oncotype DX scores within Asian and Native Hawaiian populations to the available literature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document