scholarly journals Rural Land Titling and Property Rights: Does Legislating Smallholdings as a Non-Seizable Family Asset Improve Smallholder Family Farmers’ Welfare?

Author(s):  
Juan M. Murguia ◽  
Kassu W Hossiso ◽  
Sergio H. Lence
CEPAL Review ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 1996 (58) ◽  
pp. 95-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Vogelgesang

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Drew Cameron ◽  
◽  
Edward Whitney ◽  
Paul Winters ◽  
◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomas Larsson

Thailand and Japan both faced the threat of colonialism in the latter half of the nineteenth century. While geopolitical vulnerabilities provided Japan with a critical impetus for defensive modernization, they compelled the Siamese state to pursue a strategy of defensive underdevelopment. To understand this paradox, the article explores how variations in the “unequal treaties” imposed on Japan and Siam by Western powers shaped state interests in a policy area of vital importance to the two countries' predominantly agricultural economies: the rural land rights regime.


2015 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Newman ◽  
F. Tarp ◽  
K. van den Broeck
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 232 ◽  
pp. 1026-1049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loren Brandt ◽  
Susan H. Whiting ◽  
Linxiu Zhang ◽  
Tonglong Zhang

AbstractThrough two rounds of land contracting, rural households have been allocated a bundle of rights in land. We observe significant differences across villages in the amount of land to which villagers retain a claim and the institutional mechanisms governing the exchange of land rights. This study reveals the perpetuation and expansion of non-market mechanisms accruing to the benefit of village cadres and state officials and only limited emergence of market mechanisms in which households are primary beneficiaries. It identifies factors in economic, political and legal domains that incentivize and enable state officials and local cadres to capture returns from use of land. Relatedly, the study finds differences in conflict over property-rights regimes. Drawing on a pilot survey carried out by the authors in November of 2011 in Shaanxi and Jiangsu provinces (192 households in 24 villages), this paper seeks to explain heterogeneity and change in property-rights regimes over time and across space.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document