Mammalian Septins Regulate Microtubules, Actin, and the DNA Damage Checkpoint Response

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon Edward Kremer
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Response

Regulation of Septum Formation in Aspergillus nidulans by a DNA Damage Checkpoint Pathway

Genetics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 148 (3) ◽  
pp. 1055-1067
Author(s):  
Steven D Harris ◽  
Peter R Kraus
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Aspergillus Nidulans ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Dna Metabolism ◽  
Chromosomal Dna ◽  
Checkpoint Response ◽  
Septum Formation ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway

Abstract In Aspergillus nidulans, germinating conidia undergo multiple rounds of nuclear division before the formation of the first septum. Previous characterization of temperature-sensitive sepB and sepJ mutations showed that although they block septation, they also cause moderate defects in chromosomal DNA metabolism. Results presented here demonstrate that a variety of other perturbations of chromosomal DNA metabolism also delay septum formation, suggesting that this is a general cellular response to the presence of sublethal DNA damage. Genetic evidence is provided that suggests that high levels of cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) activity are required for septation in A. nidulans. Consistent with this notion, the inhibition of septum formation triggered by defects in chromosomal DNA metabolism depends upon Tyr-15 phosphorylation of the mitotic cdk p34nimX. Moreover, this response also requires elements of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. A model is proposed that suggests that the DNA damage checkpoint response represents one of multiple sensory inputs that modulates p34nimX activity to control the timing of septum formation.

A DNA damage checkpoint response in telomere-initiated senescence

Nature ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 426 (6963) ◽  
pp. 194-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna ◽  
Philip M. Reaper ◽  
Lorena Clay-Farrace ◽  
Heike Fiegler ◽  
Philippa Carr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Response

scholarly journals Recruitment of DNA Damage Checkpoint Proteins to Damage in Transcribed and Nontranscribed Sequences

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guochun Jiang ◽  
Aziz Sancar
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Damage Site ◽  
Checkpoint Response ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Transcription Complexes

ABSTRACT We developed a chromatin immunoprecipitation method for analyzing the binding of repair and checkpoint proteins to DNA base lesions in any region of the human genome. Using this method, we investigated the recruitment of DNA damage checkpoint proteins RPA, Rad9, and ATR to base damage induced by UV and acetoxyacetylaminofluorene in transcribed and nontranscribed regions in wild-type and excision repair-deficient human cells in G1 and S phases of the cell cycle. We find that all 3 damage sensors tested assemble at the site or in the vicinity of damage in the absence of DNA replication or repair and that transcription enhances recruitment of checkpoint proteins to the damage site. Furthermore, we find that UV irradiation of human cells defective in excision repair leads to phosphorylation of Chk1 kinase in both G1 and S phase of the cell cycle, suggesting that primary DNA lesions as well as stalled transcription complexes may act as signals to initiate the DNA damage checkpoint response.

scholarly journals A Fhit-ing Role in the DNA Damage Checkpoint Response

Cell Cycle ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 1044-1048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideshi Ishii ◽  
Ya Wang ◽  
Kay Huebner
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Response

scholarly journals Phosphorylation of the Budding Yeast 9-1-1 Complex Is Required for Dpb11 Function in the Full Activation of the UV-Induced DNA Damage Checkpoint

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (15) ◽  
pp. 4782-4793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Puddu ◽  
Magda Granata ◽  
Lisa Di Nola ◽  
Alessia Balestrini ◽  
Gabriele Piergiovanni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Checkpoint Response ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Mutant Cells ◽  
Full Activation

ABSTRACT Following genotoxic insults, eukaryotic cells trigger a signal transduction cascade known as the DNA damage checkpoint response, which involves the loading onto DNA of an apical kinase and several downstream factors. Chromatin modifications play an important role in recruiting checkpoint proteins. In budding yeast, methylated H3-K79 is bound by the checkpoint factor Rad9. Loss of Dot1 prevents H3-K79 methylation, leading to a checkpoint defect in the G1 phase of the cell cycle and to a reduction of checkpoint activation in mitosis, suggesting that another pathway contributes to Rad9 recruitment in M phase. We found that the replication factor Dpb11 is the keystone of this second pathway. dot1Δ dpb11-1 mutant cells are sensitive to UV or Zeocin treatment and cannot activate Rad53 if irradiated in M phase. Our data suggest that Dpb11 is held in proximity to damaged DNA through an interaction with the phosphorylated 9-1-1 complex, leading to Mec1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9. Dpb11 is also phosphorylated after DNA damage, and this modification is lost in a nonphosphorylatable ddc1-T602A mutant. Finally, we show that, in vivo, Dpb11 cooperates with Dot1 in promoting Rad9 phosphorylation but also contributes to the full activation of Mec1 kinase.

scholarly journals Undamaged DNA Transmits and Enhances DNA Damage Checkpoint Signals in Early Embryos

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (19) ◽  
pp. 6852-6862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aimin Peng ◽  
Andrea L. Lewellyn ◽  
James L. Maller
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Nuclear Dna ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Response ◽  
Egg Extracts ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Damaged Dna

ABSTRACT In Xenopus laevis embryos, the midblastula transition (MBT) at the 12th cell division marks initiation of critical developmental events, including zygotic transcription and the abrupt inclusion of gap phases into the cell cycle. Interestingly, although an ionizing radiation-induced checkpoint response is absent in pre-MBT embryos, introduction of a threshold amount of undamaged plasmid or sperm DNA allows a DNA damage checkpoint response to be activated. We show here that undamaged threshold DNA directly participates in checkpoint signaling, as judged by several dynamic changes, including H2AX phosphorylation, ATM phosphorylation and loading onto chromatin, and Chk1/Chk2 phosphorylation and release from nuclear DNA. These responses on physically separate threshold DNA require γ-H2AX and are triggered by an ATM-dependent soluble signal initiated by damaged DNA. The signal persists in egg extracts even after damaged DNA is removed from the system, indicating that the absence of damaged DNA is not sufficient to end the checkpoint response. The results identify a novel mechanism by which undamaged DNA enhances checkpoint signaling and provide an example of how the transition to cell cycle checkpoint activation during development is accomplished by maternally programmed increases in the DNA-to-cytoplasm ratio.

scholarly journals The DNA Damage Checkpoint Response Requires Histone H2B Ubiquitination by Rad6-Bre1 and H3 Methylation by Dot1

2005 ◽  
Vol 280 (11) ◽  
pp. 9879-9886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Giannattasio ◽  
Federico Lazzaro ◽  
Paolo Plevani ◽  
Marco Muzi-Falconi
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Histone H2b ◽  
Checkpoint Response

Chromatin signaling in DNA damage checkpoint response

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
S.J. Kron ◽  
C.C. Nnakwe ◽  
E.V. Efimova ◽  
C. Chakraborty ◽  
R.R. Weichselbaum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Response
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document