The Experience of Moral Distress by Primary Care Providers in an Academic Family Medicine Practice

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn Bourne
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Moral Distress ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers

scholarly journals New Zealand among global social media initiative leaders for primary care advocacy

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Hoedebecke ◽  
Joseph Scott-Jones ◽  
Luís Pinho-Costa
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Social Media ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Family Doctor ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Family Doctors ◽  
Medicine Community ◽  
World Organisation

Abstract The international ‘#1WordforFamilyMedicine’ initiative explores the identity of General Practitioners (GPs) and Family Physicians (FPs) by allowing the international Family Medicine community to collaborate on advocating for the discipline via social media. The New Zealand version attracted 83 responses on social media. Thematic analysis was performed on the responses and a ‘word cloud’ image was created based on an image identifying the country around the world - that of the silver fern. The ‘#1WorldforFamilyMedicine’ project was promoted by WONCA (World Organisation of Family Doctors) globally to help celebrate World Family Doctor Day on 19 May 2015. To date, over 80 images have been created in 60 different countries on six continents. The images represent GPs’ love for their profession and the community they serve. We hope that this initiative will help inspire current and future Family Medicine and Primary Care providers.

scholarly journals Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e000057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa DeJonckheere ◽  
Lisa M Vaughn
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Family Physicians ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Primary Care Research ◽  
Care Research ◽  
Semistructured Interviews

Semistructured in-depth interviews are commonly used in qualitative research and are the most frequent qualitative data source in health services research. This method typically consists of a dialogue between researcher and participant, guided by a flexible interview protocol and supplemented by follow-up questions, probes and comments. The method allows the researcher to collect open-ended data, to explore participant thoughts, feelings and beliefs about a particular topic and to delve deeply into personal and sometimes sensitive issues. The purpose of this article was to identify and describe the essential skills to designing and conducting semistructured interviews in family medicine and primary care research settings. We reviewed the literature on semistructured interviewing to identify key skills and components for using this method in family medicine and primary care research settings. Overall, semistructured interviewing requires both a relational focus and practice in the skills of facilitation. Skills include: (1) determining the purpose and scope of the study; (2) identifying participants; (3) considering ethical issues; (4) planning logistical aspects; (5) developing the interview guide; (6) establishing trust and rapport; (7) conducting the interview; (8) memoing and reflection; (9) analysing the data; (10) demonstrating the trustworthiness of the research; and (11) presenting findings in a paper or report. Semistructured interviews provide an effective and feasible research method for family physicians to conduct in primary care research settings. Researchers using semistructured interviews for data collection should take on a relational focus and consider the skills of interviewing to ensure quality. Semistructured interviewing can be a powerful tool for family physicians, primary care providers and other health services researchers to use to understand the thoughts, beliefs and experiences of individuals. Despite the utility, semistructured interviews can be intimidating and challenging for researchers not familiar with qualitative approaches. In order to elucidate this method, we provide practical guidance for researchers, including novice researchers and those with few resources, to use semistructured interviewing as a data collection strategy. We provide recommendations for the essential steps to follow in order to best implement semistructured interviews in family medicine and primary care research settings.

scholarly journals 864. Adolescent Primary Care Provider Knowledge of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and Universal Screening at a Midwest Academic Medical Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S523-S524
Author(s):  
Genevieve Allen ◽  
Jamie Riddell
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Exposure Prophylaxis

Abstract Background HIV remains a problem for adolescents with 21% of new infections in the United States in 2018 occurring in youth. In this study we attempted to assess the knowledge of and comfort with pre-exposure prophylaxis and universal HIV testing among adolescent primary care providers affiliated with one academic medical center. Methods We conducted a survey of internal medicine/pediatrics, pediatrics, and family medicine residents and attending physicians affiliated with an academic medical center. Data collected included provider prescribing and referring habits for PrEP and information on their universal HIV testing habits. A “test your knowledge” section followed the survey which asked participants to name PrEP medications and to correctly select laboratory monitoring required for PrEP. Correct answers and prescribing resources were provided on completion of the survey. Results 138 (76%) respondents were aware that PrEP is approved for adolescents. There was no significant difference across specialties or between residents and attendings. 44.8% of respondents felt uncomfortable prescribing PrEP and two thirds had never prescribed PrEP. Reasons for not prescribing PrEP included: not seeing adolescents who qualify (n=80), not having enough training (66), confidentiality concerns (22), forgetting to address PrEP (19), and concern incidence of HIV is too low to recommend PrEP (15). Pediatricians were the least likely to test for HIV with 11% of pediatrician, 32% of internal medicine/pediatric, and 38% of family medicine respondents reported universal HIV testing for patients 15 years and older (p < 0.05). Residents were more likely to test for HIV than attendings (33.3% versus 16%, p < 0.05). 111 participants completed the “test your knowledge” section. 31.5% correctly named two approved PrEP medications. There were 183 responses to the survey (49% response rate). Conclusion Adolescent primary care providers are aware that PrEP is FDA approved for adolescents but a gap in PrEP prescribing and HIV testing persists. There remain perceptions that HIV incidence is too low to discuss PrEP and that providers are not seeing patients who qualify. Next steps include developing an institutional PrEP guideline and creating an electronic medical record order set to facilitate PrEP prescribing. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Innovation in primary health care responses to COVID-19 in Sub-Saharan Africa

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunanda Ray ◽  
Robert Mash
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Lessons Learnt

Abstract Background: In May 2020, the African Journal of Primary Health Care and Family Medicine invited submissions on lessons learnt from responses to the COVID-19 pandemic from primary care providers in Africa. This included descriptions of innovations and good practices, the management of COVID-19 in district health services and responses of communities to the outbreak. Aim: To synthesise the lessons learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic in the Africa region. Methods: A thematic document analysis was conducted on twenty-seven short report publications from Botswana, Ghana, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe. Findings: Eight major themes were derived from the data: community-based activities; screening and testing; reorganisation of health services; emergency care for COVID-19; maintenance of essential non-COVID-19 health services; caring for the vulnerable; use of information technology; and reframing training opportunities. Community health workers were a vital community resource, delivering medications and other supplies to homes, as well as following up on patients with chronic conditions. More investment in community partnerships and social mobilisation was proposed. Difficulties with procurement of test kits and turn-around times were constraints for most countries. Authors described how services were reorganised for focused COVID-19 activities, sometimes to the detriment of essential services and training of junior doctors. Innovations in use of internet technology for communication and remote consultations were explored. The contribution of family medicine principles in upholding the humanity of patients and their families, clear leadership and planning, multidisciplinary teamwork and continuity of care was emphasised even in the context of providing critical care. Conclusions: The community-orientated primary care approach was emphasised as well as long-term benefits of technological innovations. The pandemic exposed the need to deliver on governmental commitments to strengthening primary health care and universal health coverage.

PRECONCEPTION COUNSELING IN WOMEN WITH DIABETES BY PRIMARY CARE PROVIDERS AND PERCEIVED BARRIERS TO INITIATING THIS DISCUSSION

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 226-234
Author(s):  
Angela L. Magdaleno ◽  
Sandhya Venkataraman ◽  
Melissa Dion ◽  
Meredith Rochon ◽  
Gretchen Perilli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Primary Care Provider ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Perceived Barriers ◽  
Preconception Counseling ◽  
Care Providers

Objective: To evaluate the frequency that women with diabetes mellitus seen by a primary care provider receive preconception counseling; to identify barriers to preconception counseling; and to determine differences between family medicine, internal medicine, and obstetrics and gynecology. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study in which medical records were reviewed to determine if preconception counseling was done. An electronic survey evaluated how often preconception counseling was provided and identified perceived barriers to preconception counseling. Characteristics of those who received preconception counseling and those who did not, and survey responses between disciplines, were compared. Results: Women that met inclusion criteria: 577 (18.9% of whom received preconception counseling). A total of 88.7% of primary care providers indicated that preconception counseling was important, but only 39.2% reported that they regularly provide preconception counseling. Conclusion: Women with diabetes mellitus do not regularly receive preconception counseling by primary care providers. Lack of time and knowledge were the most commonly identified barriers to providing preconception counseling. Abbreviations: DM = diabetes mellitus; FM = family medicine; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; IM = internal medicine; LVHN = Lehigh Valley Health Network; Ob/Gyn = obstetrics/gynecology; PC = preconception counseling; PCP = primary care provider

scholarly journals Project ECHO-Geriatrics: Training Future Primary Care Providers to Meet the Needs of Older Adults

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine A. Bennett ◽  
Thuan Ong ◽  
Aimee M. Verrall ◽  
Michael V. Vitiello ◽  
Zachary A. Marcum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Healthcare Outcomes ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Specific Knowledge ◽  
Community Healthcare ◽  
Family Medicine Residency ◽  
Project Echo

ABSTRACT Background  Geriatrics training is essential for future primary care providers. The Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) model improves access to specialty care via case-based videoconferencing, but Project ECHO has not previously been designed to target residents. Objective  We designed Project ECHO-Geriatrics to deliver geriatrics education to primary care trainees using the ECHO model and evaluated self-rated geriatrics competency of trainees from the University of Washington Family Medicine Residency Network programs who participated between January 2016 and March 2017. Methods  We assessed outcomes of Project ECHO-Geriatrics through anonymous surveys. Participants rated didactics, case discussions, and geriatrics-specific knowledge before and after sessions on a 5-point scale (1, low, to 5, high). Participants were asked whether they planned to do anything differently in their practice and, if yes, to describe this change. Results  Fifteen sessions were held with 204 unique participants from 12 sites, with an average of 28 (range, 13–41) participants per session. From the 9 of 29 (31%) Family Medicine Residency Network programs that enrolled, 63% percent (116 of 184) of eligible residents attended. Sessions were highly rated (89% of responses were 4 or 5). Self-reported geriatrics-specific knowledge increased significantly (before 3.3 [SD = 0.89] versus after 4.0 [SD = 0.60], P < .001). Sixty-five percent (118 of 181) of participants reported plans to change their practice. Conclusions  Project ECHO-Geriatrics is an innovative, feasible way to train the future primary care workforce in geriatrics and grow the capacity to provide high-quality care to older adults.

Fostering interspeciality learning in cancer survivorship care: Learning suite results.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23003-e23003
Author(s):  
Genevieve Chaput ◽  
Jonathan Sussman ◽  
Tristan Williams
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Radiation Oncology ◽  
Medical Oncology ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Independent Practice ◽  
Care Providers

e23003 Background: As survivorship provision declines within cancer centres, primary care providers are increasingly entrusted in the follow-up care of cancer survivors. Empowering specialists and primary care providers about survivorship through educational interventions is essential. Interspecialty education is poorly integrated into residency training, which may impede collaboration between different providers in practice. Interspecialty partnership can positively impact patient and resource-use outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess if a cancer survivorship learning suite (LS) impacts attitudes of family medicine, radiation oncology and medical oncology trainees towards interspecialty collaboration in Montreal, Canada. Methods: A survivorship (LS) developed by a Manitoba-based team under the sponsorship of a Canadian Partnership Against Cancer grant held by Cancer Care Ontario was delivered to 49 McGill University family medicine, radiation oncology, and medical oncology trainees. The LS comprised in-person delivery of a 3-hour case-based workshop, presented by a radiation oncologist and a family physician, both experienced in the field of survivorship. An adapted version of the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) was completed by participants before and after workshop delivery. Statistical analyses included non-parametric (Wilcoxon Signed rank tests) comparisons. Results: Response rate was 63.2%, and included family medicine (65%), radiation oncology (26%), and medical oncology (10%) trainees, respectively. Following the workshop, participants were significantly more likely to agree that interspecialty learning in residency “would help physicians become better team workers”, (Z = 2.7, p < 0.008, n = 31), and “improves relationships between physicians of different specialties in independent practice afterwards”, (Z = 2.6, p < 0.009, n = 31). Participants were also significantly more likely to agree that “shared interspecialty learning < would > increase < their > ability to understand clinical problems”, (Z = 2.8, p < 0.005, n = 31). Conclusions: While much literature has focused on interprofessional collaboration at different levels of education and practice, few studies have assessed interspecialty collaboration of physicians of different specialties. This survivorship LS demonstrated favorable changes in attitudes towards interspecialty learning.

scholarly journals Family Medicine Resident Knowledge of Adverse Childhood Experiences

PRiMER ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly Collins ◽  
Carolin Spice ◽  
Bailey C. Ingraham ◽  
Morhaf Al Achkar
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Adverse Childhood Experiences ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Comfort Level ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Childhood Experiences ◽  
Knowledge And Attitudes ◽  
Adverse Childhood ◽  
Family Medicine Residents

Introduction: Exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) has been associated with poor health in adulthood. Primary care providers can provide more appropriate medical care and intervene if they ask patients about ACEs. The purpose of this study is to determine existing knowledge and attitudes about ACEs among family medicine residents within the Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, and Idaho (WWAMI) region. Methods: Researchers developed a nine-question survey to assess family medicine residents’ knowledge and attitudes about ACEs, and their comfort level in addressing ACEs. The survey was distributed to 540 residents in 22 family medicine residency programs in the WWAMI region. Results: Most residents reported they had some (32%) or moderate (35%) knowledge of the ACEs study. However, 30% reported no knowledge of the ACEs study, and very few (3%) reported significant knowledge. Of 117 respondents reporting at least some prior knowledge of ACEs, 42% had first heard about ACEs during residency. The ACEs topics that respondents felt least comfortable addressing during a patient encounter were a patient’s personal history of sexual abuse (75%) and witnessing physical abuse (47%). Most residents (84%) indicated that they would like to see ACEs integrated into their residency curriculum. Discussion: This study demonstrates a gap in residency training on the topic of ACEs in family medicine residencies within the WWAMI region. Residents are uncomfortable addressing ACEs with patients but are receptive to learning about this topic. More teaching about ACEs can increase residents’ comfort level with addressing these topics in the primary care setting.

Fostering interspeciality learning in cancer survivorship care: Learning suite results.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 59-59
Author(s):  
Genevieve Chaput ◽  
Tristan Williams ◽  
Jonathan Sussman
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Radiation Oncology ◽  
Medical Oncology ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Care Providers

59 Background: As survivorship provision declines within cancer centres, primary care providers are increasingly entrusted in the follow-up care of cancer survivors. Empowering specialists and primary care providers about survivorship through educational interventions is essential. Interspecialty education is poorly integrated into residency training, which may impede collaboration between different providers in practice. Interspecialty partnership can positively impact patient and resource- use outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess if a cancer survivorship learning suite (LS) impacts attitudes of family medicine, radiation oncology and medical oncology trainees towards interspecialty collaboration in Montreal, Canada. Methods: A survivorship (LS) developed by a Manitoba-based team under the sponsorship of a Canadian Partnership Against Cancer grant held by Cancer Care Ontario was delivered to 49 McGill University family medicine, radiation oncology, and medical oncology trainees. The LS comprised in-person delivery of a 3-hour case-based workshop, presented by a radiation oncologist and a family physician, both experienced in the field of survivorship. An adapted version of the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) was completed by participants before and after workshop delivery. Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon Signed-rank test comparisons. Results: Response rate was 63.2%, and included family medicine (65%), radiation oncology (26%), and medical oncology (10%) trainees, respectively. Following the workshop, participants were significantly more likely to agree that interspecialty learning in residency “would help physicians become better team workers”, (Z = 2.7, p < 0.008, n = 31), and “improves relationships between physicians of different specialties in independent practice afterwards”, (Z = 2.6, p < 0.009, n = 31). Participants were also significantly more likely to agree that “shared interspecialty learning < would > increase < their > ability to understand clinical problems”, (Z = 2.8, p < 0.005, n = 31). Conclusions: While much literature has focused on interprofessional collaboration at different levels of education and practice, few studies have assessed interspecialty collaboration of physicians of different specialties. This survivorship LS demonstrated favorable changes in attitudes towards interspecialty learning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document