scholarly journals The Life, Work and Legacy of Ernest A. Lynton (1926–1998)

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine Ward
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Community Engagement ◽  
Lived Experiences ◽  
Scholarly Work ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Purpose ◽  
Scholarship Of Engagement ◽  
Metropolitan Universities ◽  
Cultural Shifts ◽  
Life Work

Learning about Ernest Lynton’s rich life has been interesting for me to uncover.  Where many of us only know Ernest through his writings, I have come to learn the origins of the motivations for his work and commitments to advancing the public purpose of higher education and the scholarship of engagement. The significance of the title of the first issue of Metropolitan Universities Journal in 1990, Identity and Culture, is not lost on me as I seek to understand more fully the life, lived experiences, and identity of Ernest A. Lynton that moved him to influence cultural shifts within higher education toward increased value and legitimatization of useful, publicly engaged work.  As a researcher, I am driven to understand our individual and collective motivations for our community engagement scholarly work.  What are our aspirations for this work and its broader impact in society?  Why do what we do and how can what we do influence the greater public good.  As a steward of change (Ward and Miller, 2106), I seek ways to use our individual and collective understandings to lift up and advance institutional commitments to civic and community engagement as we help our higher education institutions hold fast to and more fully realize their responsibilities to individuals and communities beyond our walls. 

scholarly journals The Evolution of a Community-Engaged Scholar

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 8-16
Author(s):  
Mara C. Tieken
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Community Engagement ◽  
Social Issues ◽  
Early Career ◽  
Scholarly Work ◽  
Faculty Roles ◽  
Community Partners ◽  
Scholarship Of Engagement ◽  
The University ◽  
Advance Knowledge

Mara Tieken is the recipient of the 2016 Ernest A. Lynton Award for the Scholarship of Engagement for Early Career Faculty. The award recognizes exemplary community-engaged scholarly work across faculty roles. The scholarship of engagement represents an integrated view of faculty roles in which teaching, research/creative activity, and service overlap and are mutually reinforcing, is characterized by scholarly work tied to a faculty member's academic expertise, is of benefit to the external community, is visible and shared with community stakeholders, and reflects the mission of the institution. Community engagement is defined by relationships between those in the university and those outside the university that are grounded in the qualities of reciprocity, mutual respect, shared authority, and co-creation of goals and outcomes. Such relationships are by their very nature trans-disciplinary (knowledge transcending the disciplines and the college or university) and asset-based (where the strengths, skills, and knowledges of those in the community are validated and legitimized).Dr. Tieken was selected from an outstanding pool of finalists because her work exemplifies the award’s criteria. She approached her work with rural schools by validating the knowledge assets in the communities she worked with to undertake research that addressed social and racial justice and equity in those communities. She brought her students into a pedagogy shaped by participatory epistemology in which they and the community partners they work with are knowledge producers and active participants in building a wider public culture of democracy. And through integrating her faculty roles, she contributed significant service with the partners she worked with. Further, she is an agent for change on her own campus, working to create an institutional environment that supports community engaged scholars.Dr. Tieken’s emergence as an engaged scholar describes the critical nature of deep relationships with community partners, the importance of engagement being part of the socialization and training in graduate education, the significance of mentors, and the ways that institutions of higher education cultivate scholarly innovation by attending to the kinds of commitments and structures that support, recognize, and reward community engaged scholarship. As an engaged scholar, she pursues community engagement to advance knowledge that can address global social issues as they are manifest locally, and as perhaps the best way to advance knowledge in ways that fulfill the democratic purposes of higher education. 

scholarly journals Higher Education, Community Engagement, and the Public Good: Building the Future of Continuing Education in Canada

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Budd L. Hall
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Continuing Education ◽  
Community Engagement ◽  
Public Good ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Community Based Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
University Engagement ◽  
University Community

This article is about the potential for university-community engagement to serve the public good by transforming the health and well-being of our communities. It documents contemporary expressions of and renewed calls for community university engagement. It includes a detailed treatment of community based research, discussed in the overall context of community-university engagement. The article also explores some other important and growing dimensions of community university engagement, including the development of structures for the support of community-based research and community-service learning. It concludes with an argument that university-community engagement, while not the only current trend in higher education that affects our work in continuing education, is nonetheless a very important new development in which continuing education has much to offer and much to gain.

scholarly journals Conceptualizing Community Engagement: Starting a Campus-Wide Dialogue

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony M. Starke ◽  
Keristiena Shenouda ◽  
Deborah Smith-Howell
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Community Engagement ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Institutions Of Higher Education ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Design And Implementation ◽  
Analysis Phase ◽  
Metropolitan Universities ◽  
The University ◽  
And Linguistics

Institutions of higher education are increasingly compelled to produce evidence that illustrates their contribution to society. In this age of demonstrating value added, self-assessment is critical for urban and metropolitan universities. This study will explore the design and implementation of a landscape analysis – phase one of an in-depth self-assessment – at the University of Nebraska at Omaha (UNO). This process is intended to help universities gain a better understanding of how community engagement is conceptualized and institutionalized on their campus. A thorough understanding of the meaning of, and linguistics associated with, community engagement is imperative for the creation of community engagement measurement and assessment mechanisms. The authors will share the methodology and key findings, which include the discovery of domains of community engagement and acknowledgement of a spectrum of engagement. 

scholarly journals Developing the Student Anchor Engagement Framework

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Johnson Kebea
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Mixed Methods Research ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Community Benefit ◽  
Civic Learning ◽  
Anchor Institutions ◽  
Public Purpose ◽  
Metropolitan Universities ◽  
Democratic Engagement ◽  
Anchor Institution

Modern urban and metropolitan universities are increasingly obliged to recognize their role as anchor institutions. These same institutions of higher education (IHEs) also have a responsibility to educate students to be responsible and participatory citizens in society. An increasing number of IHEs recognize these distinct commitments as central to the public purpose of higher education. However, few intentionally involve students in anchor mission work. This misalignment denies students a rich opportunity for civic learning and democratic engagement. Furthermore, it prevents IHEs and their surrounding communities from realizing the benefits of harmonizing these two commitments. This mixed-methods research study resulted in the development of the Student Anchor Engagement Framework, a 36-item strategic framework designed to identify how IHEs can intentionally involve students in anchor strategy. The framework derives from The Democracy Collaborative’s Anchor Institution Community Benefit Dashboard. Expert participants ranked all items included in the framework as to their potential to influence student civic learning and democratic engagement. Implications of this research study include the potential for IHEs to consider, strategically, ways to align student civic learning with anchor institution practices for the advancement of both pursuits.

Thriving in Academia: Understanding and Managing the Complexities of Faculty Work

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ketevan Mamiseishvili
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Education Research ◽  
Community Engagement ◽  
Everyday Life ◽  
Work Setting ◽  
Higher Education Research ◽  
Faculty Work ◽  
College And University ◽  
Teaching Research ◽  
University Settings

In this paper, I will illustrate the changing nature and complexity of faculty employment in college and university settings. I will use existing higher education research to describe changes in faculty demographics, the escalating demands placed on faculty in the work setting, and challenges that confront professors seeking tenure or administrative advancement. Boyer’s (1990) framework for bringing traditionally marginalized and neglected functions of teaching, service, and community engagement into scholarship is examined as a model for balancing not only teaching, research, and service, but also work with everyday life.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document