scholarly journals Exploring How Practicing Social Workers Define Evidence-Based Practice

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 1237-1249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill M. Chonody ◽  
Barbra Teater

This research note presents findings from a study that sought to garner a better understanding of the way in which practicing social workers defined Evidence-Based Practice (EBP). As part of a larger quantitative study, 137 social work practitioners provided a definition for EBP through an online survey and indicated the extent to which they: consider themselves an evidence-based practitioner; believe practitioners should apply EBP in social work; and were prepared through their social work education to use EBP. Content analysis of the practitioners’ definitions of EBP revealed that the majority of respondents described EBP as an intervention or a product versus a process. Regardless of the definition that was provided, descriptive statistics revealed practitioners reported on average that they identified somewhat as an evidence-based practitioner, believed that practitioners should apply EBP in practice moderately to always, and felt only moderately prepared by their social work education for EBP. The findings suggest an opportunity in social work education may exist to further reinforce the process of EBP to delineate it from the evidence-based interventions that may also be taught, especially in clinical programs. Dissemination may also need to occur through mandated continuing education hours, much like ethics has been added as a requirement in some states.

Author(s):  
Frederik Booysen ◽  
Paulin Mbecke ◽  
Amanda De Gouveia ◽  
Tatenda Manomano ◽  
Pius Tanga

The implementation of evidence-based social work practice is an international priority. Attitudes to evidence-based practice are instrumental in its dissemination and active implementation. This paper, the first of its kind, explores the nature and correlates of attitudes to evidence-based practice among social work practitioners in South Africa, based on a descriptive statistical analysis of data from a small online survey. In terms of results, the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale suggests that respondents’ attitudes to evidence-based practice are generally positive. One exception is the requirements sub-scale, where performance indicates some resistance to a regulatory or authoritarian approach to the implementation of evidence-based social work practice. Furthermore, the limited evidence presented here shows that more experienced social work practitioners are less inclined to adopt prescribed evidence-based practice. Moreover, they find such practice less appealing, and are less open to implementing new structured and manualised interventions. With regard to recommendations, it is proposed that training in evidence-based practice be incorporated into continuous professional development programmes for social work practitioners. In addition, studies of this nature should be replicated on a more comprehensive and representative scale in South Africa and other developing countries.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 26-45
Author(s):  
Michal Olah ◽  
Jozef Suvada ◽  
Zainab Akol ◽  
Jan Mihalik ◽  
Paweł Czarnecki

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew O. Howard ◽  
Curtis J. McMillen ◽  
David E. Pollio

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document