Longitudinal Intervention Study for Type II Diabetes Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuehui Qian
1970 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashok Sahu ◽  
Trapti Gupta ◽  
Arvind Kavishwar ◽  
Purnima Dey Sarkar ◽  
RK Singh

Cardiovascular disease is the most frequent cause of death in patient with diabetes. It is difficult to evaluate cardiovascular status of patients with diabetes because of complex symptomatology. NTproBNP, a split peptide from pro BNP molecule is a novel biomarker, released from cardiac myocytes in response to myocardial stretch, cardio vascular disease, endothelial dysfunction and heart failure. We aimed to test that is elevated NTproBNP levels associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease in diabetes patients in comparison to matched control. Demographic, anthropometric measure, NT pro BNP, lipid profile, blood glucose were estimated and compared among angiographically proven cardiovascular disease patients with diabetes and healthy controls. Univariate and multivariate analysis were carried out to compare individual factor using t-Test, ANOVA and the inter group comparisons were done by using Bon ferroni Post Hoc test. Patients with type 2 diabetes were shown to have higher NTproBNP values (n=50, 1481.021±813.405) than control subjects (n=50, 23.562±23.395) (p <0.05). NTproBNP levels were independently related to diabetes after adjustment for age, sex, family history, smoking, obesity, blood pressure and lipid profile. Our data suggests that the secretion of NT pro BNP is increased in type II diabetes patients, suggesting association of diabetes and NTproBNP in cardio vascular disease with higher prevalence. Thus NTproBNP may serve as a screening tool to diagnose patients with type II diabetes with cardiovascular disease having complex symptomatology. Keyword: NTproBNP, Cardiovascular disease, Diabetes DOI:10.3329/jom.v11i1.4266 J Medicine 2010: 11: 33-38


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christel E van Dijk ◽  
Trynke Hoekstra ◽  
Robert A Verheij ◽  
Jos WR Twisk ◽  
Peter P Groenewegen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 188
Author(s):  
Iram Jaan ◽  
Mir Maroosha Farooq ◽  
Varun Malhotra

Diabetologia ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Maier ◽  
Volkmar Lange ◽  
Andreas Simm ◽  
Ulrich Walter ◽  
Michael Kirstein

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (2S) ◽  
pp. 35-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona De Portu ◽  
Sabato Montella ◽  
Paolo Cortesi ◽  
Enrica Menditto ◽  
Lorenzo G. Mantovani

Introduction: in the last decades, prevalence and incidence of type II diabetes mellitus have been rapidly growing worldwide. Most recent projections estimate that the number of people affected by diabetes is destined to double in 2030, producing a significant increase of the healthcare expenditure for the management of complications. Prevention of cardiovascular events in diabetes population represents a priority for decision makers, who have to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. Objective: to provide an updated cost-effectiveness evaluation of treating type II diabetes patients with atorvastatin versus placebo, in the light of the imminent price reduction of atorvastatin due to loss of exclusivity and of other therapeutic and hospital costs. Material and Methods: we derived clinical information from the CARDS study, a randomized, multicenter clinical trial evaluating efficacy of atorvastatin versus placebo in preventing the occurrence of cardiovascular events in a cohort of type II diabetes patients without previous history of coronary events. A cost-effectiveness analysis in the perspective of the National Healthcare System (SSN) has been performed, under the hypothesis of the imminent price reduction of atorvastatin, due to the loss of exclusivity. Results: after a median follow up of 3.9 years, the number of patients with at least a major cardiovascular event requiring hospitalization was lower in the atorvastatin arm (5.8%) compared to the placebo arm (9.0%; p=0.001). Based on a cohort of 1,000 patients, treatment with atorvastatin permitted to gain 29.28 life years. The incremental cost of adding atorvastatin to the standard therapy amounted to €305,682, and was partially balanced by a cost reduction due to fewer hospitalizations, compared to the placebo arm (€ 168,313). Total direct costs were of €602.186 in the atorvastatin group and of € 464,818 in the placebo group, resulting into an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of € 4,692 for Life Year Gained (LYG). Conclusion: the present study is an update of a previous economic analysis of the CARDS trial. Under the assumed new cost scenario, the cost-effectiveness profile of treating diabetic patients with atorvastatin becomes highly favourable, and leads to a significant reduction of the cost for Life Year Gained compared to the previous findings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document