Health care resources (Edition 2018/1)

2017 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Resources

scholarly journals COVID-19 mortality and health-care resources: Organization

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 383-384
Author(s):  
P. Immovilli ◽  
N. Morelli ◽  
E. Rota ◽  
D. Guidetti
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Resources

Empiricism and Rights Justify the Allocation of Health Care Resources to Persons with Disorders of Consciousness

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 169-171
Author(s):  
Joseph T. Giacino ◽  
Yelena G. Bodien ◽  
David Zuckerman ◽  
Jaimie Henderson ◽  
Nicholas D. Schiff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Disorders Of Consciousness ◽  
Health Care Resources

scholarly journals Poverty in the Midst of Plenty: Unmet Needs and Distribution of Health Care Resources in South Korea

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. e51004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jongho Heo ◽  
Juwhan Oh ◽  
Jukyung Kim ◽  
Manwoo Lee ◽  
Jin-seok Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
South Korea ◽  
Unmet Needs ◽  
Health Care Resources

Home Visitation Investment

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-169
Author(s):  
NORMAN J. SISSMAN
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Home Visits ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Home Visitation ◽  
Benefit Ratio ◽  
Health Care Resources ◽  
Detailed Consideration ◽  
Cost Benefit Ratio ◽  
Women And Children ◽  
The Cost

To the Editor.— Two recent reviews in Pediatrics1,2 provide much interesting information on the effect of home visits on the health of women and children. However, I was disappointed not to find in either article more than token reference to the cost of the programs reviewed. In this day of increasingly scarce health care resources, we no longer have the luxury of evaluating programs such as these without detailed consideration of their cost-benefit ratio.

The U.S. Health Delivery System: Inefficient and Unfair to Children

1997 ◽  
Vol 23 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 319-337
Author(s):  
Loretta M. Kopelman ◽  
Michael G. Palumbo
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Universal Access ◽  
The United States ◽  
Industrialized Countries ◽  
Health Care Resources ◽  
Health Delivery ◽  
Hip Replacements ◽  
The Many ◽  
Older Citizens

What proportion of health care resources should go to programs likely to benefit older citizens, such as treatments for Alzheimer’s disease and hip replacements, and what share should be given to programs likely to benefit the young, such as prenatal and neonatal care? What portion should go to rare but severe diseases that plague the few, or to common, easily correctable illnesses that afflict the many? What percentage of funds should go to research, rehabilitation or to intensive care? Many nations have made such hard choices about how to use their limited funds for health care by explicitly setting priorities based on their social commitments. In the United States, however, allocation of health care resources has largely been left to personal choice and market forces. Although the United States spends around 14% of its gross national product (GNP) on health care, the United States and South Africa are the only two industrialized countries that fail to provide citizens with universal access.

Moral Judgments in the Rationing of Health Care Resources

1997 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 13-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry W. Foster ◽  
Linda J. McLellan
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Moral Judgments ◽  
Health Care Resources
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document