scholarly journals Broadband time domain modeling of earthquakes from Friuli, Italy

1981 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 1215-1231
Author(s):  
John Cipar
Keyword(s):  
Time Domain ◽  
Main Shock ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
High Stress ◽  
Point Sources ◽  
Domain Modeling ◽  
Long Period ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Stress Drops ◽  
Period Instruments

abstract Short-period (SP) and long-period (LP) seismograms written by the main shock and two principal aftershocks of the 1976 Friuli, Italy, earthquake sequence are modeled in the time domain using synthetic seismograms. The main shock occurred on 6 May 1976 (20h 00m, Ms = 6.5) and both aftershocks on 15 September 1976 (03h 15m, Ms = 6.0 and 09h 21m, Ms = 5.9). Source models were determined initially by trial and error and then refined using a waveform inversion program. Two point sources of radiation are required to adequately model the aftershock short-period records. For the 09h 21m aftershock, the model derived from short-period records also produces good fits to the long-period data. The seismic moment of this earthquake is found to be 0.8 to 1.0 × 1025 dyne-cm. The SP model for the 03h 15m aftershock, on the other hand, predicts long-period synthetics which do not agree with the observations. In particular, the SP moment (0.37 × 1025 dyne-cm) is about 212 times smaller than the LP moment (1 × 1025 dyne-cm). Adding a long-period component to the SP model considerably improves LP waveform and moment agreement. In the case of the main shock, a reasonable fit to the observed SP data is obtained using three point sources of radiation. However, LP synthetics computed using this model do not agree with the observations, and the SP moment (0.65 × 1025 dyne-cm) is a small fraction of the LP moment (3 to 5 × 1025 dyne-cm). Time function durations indicate that the individual events inferred from the SP records are radiated from patches of the fault having radii of 2 to 4 km and stress drops in the range 35 to 276 bars. In comparison, stress drops estimated from LP data are found to be 12 bars (main shock) and 24 bars (09h 21m aftershock). These observations suggest that the short-period instruments are sensitive to the high-frequency radiation emitted from small, high-stress drop areas on the fault plane whereas the long-period instruments record the overall motion during the earthquake.

Short- and long-period subevents of the 4 February 1965 Rat Islands earthquake

1984 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 1331-1347
Author(s):  
Jim Mori
Keyword(s):  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Fault Plane ◽  
High Stress ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Long Period ◽  
P Wave Velocity ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Main Fault ◽  
The Times ◽  
Stress Drops

Abstract Short- and long-period records of the P wave of the 1965 Rat Islands earthquake were analyzed to locate subevents within the main rupture. Four subevents were identified on the short-period records in the first 100 sec and on the two long-period records in the first 30 sec. The short-period subevents cluster in an area 100 km south of the initial epicenter which appears to be off of the main fault plane, an area in which two larger aftershocks have relatively high stress drops. The long-period subevents are located 90 km west of the initial epicenter. The times and locations of the first short- and long-period subevents indicate they were triggered by a front moving near the P-wave velocity.

Complex faulting deduced from broadband modeling of the 28 February 1990 Upland earthquake (ML = 5.2)

1991 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 1129-1144
Author(s):  
Douglas S. Dreger ◽  
Donald V. Helmberger
Keyword(s):  
Point Source ◽  
Green's Functions ◽  
Main Shock ◽  
Fault Plane ◽  
Green’S Functions ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Long Period ◽  
Short Period ◽  
First Motion

Abstract The 1990 Upland earthquake was one of the first sizable local events to be recorded broadband at Pasadena, where the Green's functions appropriate for the path are known from a previous study. The synthetics developed in modeling the 1988 Upland sequence were available for use in rapid assessment of the activity. First-motion studies from the Caltech-USGS array data gave two solutions for the 1990 main shock based on the choice of regional velocity models. Although these focal mechanisms differ by less than 5° in strike and 20° rake, it proved possible to further constrain the solution using these derived Green's functions and a three-component waveform inversion scheme. We obtain from long-period waves a fault-plane solution of θ = 216°, δ = 77°, λ = 5.0°, M0 = 2.5 × 1024 dyne-cm, depth = 6 km, and a source duration of 1.2 sec, for which the orientation and source depth are in good agreement with the first-motion results of Hauksson and Jones (1991). Comparisons of the broadband displacement records with the high-pass Wood-Anderson simulations suggests the 1990 earthquake was a complicated event with a strong asperity at depth. Double point-source models indicate that about 30 per cent of the moment was released from a 9-km deep asperity following the initial source by 0.0 to 0.5 sec. Our best-fitting distributed fault model indicates that the timing of our point-source results is feasible assuming a reasonable rupture velocity. The rupture initiated at a depth of about 6 km and propagated downward on a 3.5 by 3.5 km (length by width) fault. Both the inversion of long-period waves and the distributed fault modeling indicate that the main shock did not rupture the entire depth extent of the fault defined by the aftershock zone. A relatively small asperity (about 1.0 km2) with a greater than 1 kbar stress drop controls the short-period Wood-Anderson waveforms. This asperity appears to be located in a region where seismicity shows a bend in the fault plane.

The foreshock sequence of the 1986 Chalfant, California, earthquake

1988 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 172-187
Author(s):  
Kenneth D. Smith ◽  
Keith F. Priestley
Keyword(s):  
Main Shock ◽  
Slip Surface ◽  
Body Waves ◽  
Aftershock Distribution ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Main Shocks ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Local Shear ◽  
Stress Drops ◽  
Foreshock Activity

Abstract The ML 6.4 Chalfant, California, earthquake of 21 July 1986 was preceded by an extensive foreshock sequence. Foreshock activity is characterized by shallow clustering activity, including 7 events greater than ML 3, beginning 18 days before the earthquake, an ML 5.7 foreshock 24 hr before the main shock that ruptured only in the upper 10 km of the crust, and an “off-fault” cluster of activity perpendicular to the slip surface of the ML 5.7 foreshock associated with the hypocenter of the main shock. The Chalfant sequence occurred within the local short-period network, and the spatial and temporal development of the foreshock sequence can be observed in detail. Seismicity of the July 1986 time period is largely confined to two nearly conjugate planes; one striking N30°E and dipping 60° to the northwest associated with the ML 5.7 foreshock and the other striking N25°W and dipping 70° to the southwest associated with the main shock. Focal mechanisms for the foreshock period fall into two classes in agreement with these two planes. Shallow clustering of earthquakes in July and the ML 5.7 principal foreshock occur at the intersection of the two planes at a depth of approximately 7 km. The seismic moments determined from inversion of the teleseismic body waves are 4.2 × 1025 and 2.5 × 1025 dyne-cm for the principal foreshock and the main shock, respectively. Slip areas for these two events can be estimated from the aftershock distribution and result in stress drops of 63 bars for the principal foreshock and 16 bars for the main shock. The main shock occurred within an “off-fault” cluster of earthquakes associated with the principal foreshock. This cluster of activity occurs at a predicted local shear stress high in relation to the slip surface of the 20 July earthquake, and this appears to be the triggering mechanism of the main shock. The shallow rupture depth of the principal foreshock indicates that this event was anomalous with respect to the character of main shocks in the region.

scholarly journals Northridge aftershocks, a source study with TERRAscope data

1997 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 1024-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi J. Song ◽  
Donald V. Helmberger
Keyword(s):  
Wave Train ◽  
Depth Range ◽  
Long Period ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Relative Stress ◽  
Source Mechanisms ◽  
Extended Surface ◽  
San Fernando ◽  
Stress Drops ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract Broadband and long-period displacement waveforms from a selection of Northridge aftershocks recorded by the TERRAscope array are modeled to study source characteristics. Source mechanisms and moments are determined with long-period data using an algorithm developed by Zhao and Helmberger (1994). These results are compared with those by Hauksson et al. (1995) and Thio and Kanamori (1996). The width of the direct pulses at the nearest stations PAS and CALB are measured as indications of the source duration. Another measurement of the source-time functions of these earthquakes is obtained by comparing the short-period to long-period energy ratio in the data to that in the synthetics. These measurements are used to estimate the relative stress drop using a formula given by Cohn et al. (1982). The depth distribution of the relative stress drops indicates that the largest stress drops are in the depth range of 5 to 15 km for an aftershock population of 24 events. A correlation of extended surface wave train with source depth is demonstrated for paths crossing the San Fernando basin.

scholarly journals Inversion of the body waves from the Borrego Mountain earthquake to the source mechanism

1976 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 1485-1499 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. Burdick ◽  
George R. Mellman
Keyword(s):  
Body Wave ◽  
High Stress ◽  
Time Function ◽  
The Body ◽  
Body Waves ◽  
Polarization Angle ◽  
Long Period ◽  
Amplitude Data ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Wide Range

abstract The generalized linear inverse technique has been adapted to the problem of determining an earthquake source model from body-wave data. The technique has been successfully applied to the Borrego Mountain earthquake of April 9, 1968. Synthetic seismograms computed from the resulting model match in close detail the first 25 sec of long-period seismograms from a wide range of azimuths. The main shock source-time function has been determined by a new simultaneous short period-long period deconvolution technique as well as by the inversion technique. The duration and shape of this time function indicate that most of the body-wave energy was radiated from a surface with effective radius of only 8 km. This is much smaller than the total surface rupture length or the length of the aftershock zone. Along with the moment determination of Mo = 11.2 ×1025 dyne-cm, this radius implies a high stress drop of about 96 bars. Evidence in the amplitude data indicates that the polarization angle of shear waves is very sensitive to lateral structure.

Time domain waveform inversion—A frequency domain view: How well we need to match waveforms?

1991 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 2351-2370
Author(s):  
Zoltan A. Der ◽  
Robert H. Shumway ◽  
Michael R. Hirano
Keyword(s):  
Time Domain ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Quantitative Measure ◽  
Domain Modeling ◽  
Low Frequencies ◽  
Waveform Modeling ◽  
Time Domain Modeling ◽  
Frequency Components ◽  
The Time Domain

Abstract Waveform modeling in the time domain matches the various frequency components of seismic signals unevenly; the agreement is better at low frequencies and becomes progressively worse towards higher frequencies. The net effect of this kind of time-domain modeling is that the resolution in the spatial details of the source is less than optimal since the high-frequency components of the signal with their short wavelengths to resolve finer details do not fit the data. These problems are demonstrated by numerical simulations and by the reanalysis of some aspects of the El Golfo earthquake in using a new seismic imaging technique based on a generalization of an f-k algorithm. This procedure computes a statistic that can be used to derive confidence limits of the parameters sought in the inversion, thus providing a quantitative measure of the uncertainties in the results.

scholarly journals Parkfield earthquake of June 28, 1966: Magnitude and source mechanism

1968 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 689-709
Author(s):  
Francis T. Wu
Keyword(s):  
Love Wave ◽  
Main Shock ◽  
Near Field ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Wave Radiation ◽  
Motion Data ◽  
Long Period ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Double Couple ◽  
Parkfield Earthquake

Abstract The Parkfield earthquake of June 28, 1966 (04:26:12.4 GMT) is studied using short-period and long-period teleseismic records. It is found that (1) Mb = 5.8 and Ms = 6.4 as compared to Mb = 5.4 and Ms = 5.4 for the foreshock (04:08:54), (2) both the Rayleigh and Love wave radiation patterns conform to those of a double couple at a depth of about 8.6 km, (3) the main shock can be represented by a series of shocks separated in space and time. The near-field strong-motion data support the last conclusion. Based on strong-motion seismograms, and the surficial evidences of the dimensions of the fault, the energy is found to be 1021 ergs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document