scholarly journals The Manix (California) earthquake of April 10, 1947*

1947 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-179
Author(s):  
C. F. Richter
Keyword(s):  
Main Shock ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Probable Error ◽  
Origin Time ◽  
Left Hand

Summary Instrumental epicenter and origin time for the Manix earthquake are 34°58′ N, 116° 32′ W., 07:58:04 P.S.T. (15:58:04 G.C.T.), April 10, 1947. The probable error of location does not exceed a few kilometers. Certain aftershocks originated south of the main shock. Initial recorded compressions and dilatations are consistent with left-hand strike-slip on a previously identified fault which trends about N 70° E. Trace phenomena, to be reported later, were produced. Other effects, including damage, in the heavily shaken area are described.

scholarly journals Mechanisms of the aftershocks of the Kern County, California, earthquake of 1952

1958 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-146
Author(s):  
Markus Båth ◽  
Charles F. Richter
Keyword(s):  
Main Shock ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Kern County ◽  
The South ◽  
Longitudinal Waves ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
The North ◽  
Right Hand ◽  
First Motion ◽  
Strain Release

abstract Using directions of first motion of longitudinal waves recorded at near-by stations, the orientation of fault traces and the nature of fault motions have been deduced for fifty-seven earthquakes of the Kern County aftershock series. Unlike the main shock, the aftershocks exhibit considerable strike slip with left-hand strike slip dominating on and to the south of the White Wolf fault and right-hand strike slip and dip slip to the north of it. The two last-mentioned mechanisms represent a secondary strain release, beginning not earlier than thirty-seven hours after the main shock.

scholarly journals Instrumental study of the Manix Earthquakes*

1951 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-388
Author(s):  
C. F. Richter ◽  
J. M. Nordquist
Keyword(s):  
Mojave Desert ◽  
Seismic Waves ◽  
Large Angle ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
The Other ◽  
Origin Time ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Instrumental Study ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Times

Summary Readings from seismograms of thirty-eight shocks occurring on the Mojave Desert near Manix, California, are tabulated, plotted, and discussed. For a large proportion of the shocks (Groups A and D), the most clearly identified seismic waves have travel times as follows (times in seconds, Δ in kilometers): p–O=D/6.34P–O=–1.2 + 0.1799 ΔPn–O=5.4 + 0.12195 Δs–O=D/3.67Pm–O=3.9 + 0.1427 ΔSn–O=9.0 + 0.220 ΔPy–O=1.2 + 0.1610 ΔSa–O=6.0 + 0.25 Δ D is calculated from Δ assuming a depth of 16 km. For the remaining shocks (Groups B and C), the constant terms in the equations for Pn, Pm, Py are increased to 6.0, 4.5, and 2.2, respectively; the other equations are unchanged, but D is calculated for a depth of 10 km. The Group A shocks are assigned to four subgroups. Epicenters are as follows: GroupLat. NLong. WA1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34°57.5116°32′A2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3459.511633.5A3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .345811633A4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .350011634B. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .345611631C. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3457.511632D. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .345311637 Epicenters A1 to B follow an alignment striking about N 30° W, crossing the Manix fault at a large angle. No shocks are located elsewhere along the Manix fault, but the smaller shocks cannot be placed accurately. The principal earthquake, of magnitude 6.2, is assigned to the A2 epicenter, with origin time 07:58:05.6 P.S.T. (15:58:05.6 G.C.T.), April 10, 1947. This agrees well with the times recorded at distant stations. A catalogue is given listing all subsequent shocks of magnitude 3.0 or greater in the area to the end of April, 1950, with assignment to one of the groups when possible. Recorded initial compressions and dilatations at the several stations are equally consistent with right-hand strike-slip on a hypothetical fault following the line of located epicenters, or with left-hand strike-slip on the Manix fault; the latter displacement was actually found. It is suggested that both occurred. Representative seismograms are reproduced.

The Chelmsford-Lowell, Massachusetts, earthquake of 23 November 1980: Depth control and fault plane solution

1981 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 1369-1372
Author(s):  
Jay J. Pulli ◽  
Michael J. Guenette
Keyword(s):  
New England ◽  
Fault Plane ◽  
Seismic Station ◽  
Focal Depth ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Fault Plane Solution ◽  
Origin Time ◽  
Small Magnitude ◽  
Depth Control ◽  
Plane Solution

abstract On 23 November 1980, a small (magnitude 2.9) earthquake occurred on the Chelmsford-Lowell, Massachusetts, border, approximately 10 km northeast of the MIT seismic station at Westford, Massachusetts (WFM). Thus we were able to accurately determine the focal depth, which is generally not the case in New England. Our hypocentral solution was latitude 41.63, longitude −71.36, depth 1.5 km, at origin time 00:39:32.0 UTC. The fault plane solution shows either strike-slip or dip-slip faulting with a P axis trending NE-SW, which is in agreement with overcoring measurements in a nearby granite quarry.

Moment-tensor solutions for the 24 November 1987 Superstition Hills, California, earthquakes

1989 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 493-499
Author(s):  
Stuart A. Sipkin
Keyword(s):  
Main Shock ◽  
Moment Tensor ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Origin Time ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Filter Theory ◽  
Long Period ◽  
Seismograph Network ◽  
Scalar Moment

Abstract The teleseismic long-period waveforms recorded by the Global Digital Seismograph Network from the two largest Superstition Hills earthquakes are inverted using an algorithm based on optimal filter theory. These solutions differ slightly from those published in the Preliminary Determination of Epicenters Monthly Listing because a somewhat different, improved data set was used in the inversions and a time-dependent moment-tensor algorithm was used to investigate the complexity of the main shock. The foreshock (origin time 01:54:14.5, mb 5.7, Ms 6.2) had a scalar moment of 2.3 × 1025 dyne-cm, a depth of 8 km, and a mechanism of strike 217°, dip 79°, rake 4°. The main shock (origin time 13:15:56.4, mb 6.0, Ms 6.6) was a complex event, consisting of at least two subevents, with a combined scalar moment of 1.0 × 1026 dyne-cm, a depth of 10 km, and a mechanism of strike 303°, dip 89°, rake −180°.

Rampart seismic zone of central Alaska

1983 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 813-829
Author(s):  
P. Yi-Fa Huang ◽  
N. N. Biswas
Keyword(s):  
Main Shock ◽  
Fault Plane ◽  
B Value ◽  
Aftershock Sequence ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Lithospheric Plate ◽  
Normal Faults ◽  
Seismic Zone ◽  
The West ◽  
Fault Plane Solutions

abstract This paper describes the characteristics of the Rampart seismic zone by means of the aftershock sequence of the Rampart earthquake (ML = 6.8) which occurred in central Alaska on 29 October 1968. The magnitudes of the aftershocks ranged from about 1.6 to 4.4 which yielded a b value of 0.96 ± 0.09. The locations of the aftershocks outline a NNE-SSW trending aftershock zone about 50 km long which coincides with the offset of the Kaltag fault from the Victoria Creek fault. The rupture zone dips steeply (≈80°) to the west and extends from the surface to a depth of about 10 km. Fault plane solutions for a group of selected aftershocks, which occurred over a period of 22 days after the main shock, show simultaneous occurrences of strike-slip and normal faults. A comparison of the trends in seismicity between the neighboring areas shows that the Rampart seismic zone lies outside the area of underthrusting of the lithospheric plate in southcentral and central Alaska. The seismic zone outlined by the aftershock sequence appears to represent the formation of an intraplate fracture caused by regional northwest compression.

Aftershock sequence and focal parameters of the February 28, 1969 earthquake of the Azores-Gibraltar fracture zone

1972 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 699-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. López Arroyo ◽  
A. Udías
Keyword(s):  
Canary Islands ◽  
Fracture Zone ◽  
Main Shock ◽  
Fault Plane ◽  
Aftershock Sequence ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Strait Of Gibraltar ◽  
Wide Region ◽  
Focal Parameters ◽  
Source Mechanism Solution

Abstract The earthquake of February 28, 1969, which occurred about 500 km west of the Strait of Gibraltar, was felt over the entire Iberian Peninsula, in a wide region of Morocco, and south to the Canary Islands. It had a long sequence of aftershocks continuing for at least 10 months, but, nevertheless, most of the energy seems to have been liberated in the main shock of which the mb was 7.4. The source mechanism solution indicates a fault plane striking N 67°W and dipping 68°SW, with motion principally of the strike-slip type. There also is some overthrusting. The horizontal extent of faulting is of the order of 90 km.

Aftershocks and surface faulting associated with the intraplate Guinea, West Africa, earthquake of 22 December 1983

1987 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 1579-1601
Author(s):  
C. J. Langer ◽  
M. G. Bonilla ◽  
G. A. Bollinger
Keyword(s):  
West Africa ◽  
Focal Mechanism ◽  
Main Shock ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Fault System ◽  
Epicentral Area ◽  
Lateral Strike Slip ◽  
Focal Mechanism Solutions ◽  
Short Period ◽  
East West

Abstract This study reports on the results of geological and seismological field studies conducted following the rare occurrence of a moderate-sized West African earthquake (mb = 6.4) with associated ground breakage. The epicentral area of the northwestern Guinea earthquake of 22 December 1983 is a coastal margin, intraplate locale with a very low level of historical seismicity. The principal results include the observation that seismic faulting occurred on a preexisting fault system and that there is good agreement among the surface faulting, the spatial distribution of the aftershock hypocenters, and the composite focal mechanism solutions. We are not able, however, to shed any light on the reason(s) for the unexpected occurrence of this intraplate earthquake. Thus, the significance of this study is its contribution to the observational datum for such earthquakes and for the seismicity of West Africa. The main shock was associated with at least 9 km of surface fault-rupture. Trending east-southeast to east-west, measured fault displacements up to ∼13 cm were predominantly right-lateral strike slip and were accompanied by an additional component (5 to 7 cm) of vertical movement, southwest side down. The surface faulting occurred on a preexisting fault whose field characteristics suggest a low slip rate with very infrequent earthquakes. There were extensive rockfalls and minor liquefaction effects at distances less than 10 km from the surface faulting and main shock epicenter. Main shock focal mechanism solutions derived from teleseismic data by other workers show a strong component of normal faulting motion that was not observed in the ground ruptures. A 15-day period of aftershock monitoring, commencing 22 days after the main shock, was conducted. Eleven portable, analog short-period vertical seismographs were deployed in a network with an aperture of 25 km and an average station spacing of 7 km. Ninety-five aftershocks were located from the more than 200 recorded events with duration magnitudes of about 1.5 or greater. Analysis of a selected subset (91) of those events define a tabular aftershock volume (26 km long by 14 km wide by 4 km thick) trending east-southeast and dipping steeply (∼60°) to the south-southwest. Composite focal mechanisms for groups of events, distributed throughout the aftershock volume, exhibit right-lateral, strike-slip motion on subvertical planes that strike almost due east. Although the general agreement between the field geologic and seismologic results is good, our preferred interpretation is for three en-echelon faults striking almost due east-west.

Features and origin time of Mesozoic strike-slip structures in the Yilan-Yitong Fault Zone

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (12) ◽  
pp. 2389-2410 ◽  
Author(s):  
ChengChuan Gu ◽  
Guang Zhu ◽  
MingJian Zhai ◽  
ShaoZe Lin ◽  
LiHong Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fault Zone ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Origin Time

scholarly journals Исмаиллинское землетрясение 5 февраля 2019

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.J. Yetirmishli ◽  
S.S. Ismailova ◽  
S.E. Kazimova
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Activity ◽  
Main Shock ◽  
Source Area ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Seismogenic Zone ◽  
Deep Penetration ◽  
The West ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Basement Faults ◽  
The Right

The Shamakhi-Ismailli seismogenic zone is known as the zone of the most powerful earthquakes in the Caucasus, which has been characterized by high seismic activity for centuries. Analysis of seismicity over the past 15 years has shown an increase in activity in this region. In October 2012, there was a devastating earthquake with a magnitude of 5.3. It is this earthquake that can be considered a trigger of activity in this region in subsequent years. In view of this, the task of studying seismicity, as well as the stress fields of the lithosphere of the region under study, seems to be especially urgent. The study of the seismicity of the Shamakhi-Ismailli zone provides additional information on the deep tectonic processes occurring in this region, which is important for seismic zoning. Aim. The article analyzes the seismic activity of the Shamakhi-Ismailli region, which began with an earthquake on February 5 at 19 h 19 min, with ml = 4.4, which occurred 11 minutes before the main shock with an intensity of 6 points, which occurred on February 5, 2019 at 19 h 31 m. Methods.The epicentral field was studied, as well as the distribution of foci in depth, solutions of the mechanisms of foci of the main shock and the most noticeable aftershock were constructed and analyzed. A diagram of the main elements of the rupture tectonics of the Shamakhi-Ismailli focal zone has been drawn, on which the mechanisms of the focal points of the lakes of the Ismailli field are plotted. Results. It has been established that the source area is located in the zone of intersection of the Vandam longitudinal fault with the West Caspian and transverse Akhsu strike-slip faults, which additionally characterizes the high seismic activity and deep penetration of the West Caspian right-sided orthogonal fault. Thus, it can be seen that, in terms of epicenters, they tend to the basement faults and the nodes of their intersection, i.e. The main shock that occurred on February 5, 2019, shows the agreement of the second nodal plane NP2 with the right-lateral Akhsu and West-Caspian transverse faults characterized by the type of displacement right-lateral strike-slip. An analysis of the orientation of the compression axes showed the NE-SW orientation, and the extension axes of the NW-SE orientation Шамахи-Исмаиллинская сейсмогенная зона известна как зона самых сильных землетрясений на Кавказе, которая на протяжении веков характеризовалась высокой сейсмической активностью. Анализ сейсмичности за последние 15 лет показал рост активности в этом регионе. В октябре 2012 года произошло разрушительное землетрясение магнитудой 5,3. Именно это землетрясение можно считать триггером активности в этом регионе в последующие годы. В связи с этим задача изучения сейсмичности, а также полей напряжений литосферы изучаемого региона представляется особенно актуальной. Изучение сейсмичности Шамахи-Исмаиллинской зоны дает дополнительную информацию о глубинных тектонических процессах, происходящих в этом регионе, что важно для сейсмического районирования. Цель работы.В статье проанализирована сейсмическая активность Шамахы-Исмаиллинского района, начавшаяся землетрясением 5 февраля в 19 ч 19 мин, с ml = 4,4, произошедшим за 11 минут до главного толчка с интенсивностью 6 баллов, произошедшего 5 февраля 2019 в 19 час 31 мин. Методы работы. Изучены эпицентральное поле, распределение очагов по глубине, построены и проанализированы решения механизмов очагов главного толчка и наиболее заметного афтершока. Составлена схема основных элементов разрывной тектоники Шамахы-Исмаиллинской очаговой зоны, на которой нанесены механизмы очагов озер Исмаиллинского месторождения. Результаты работы. Установлено, что очаговая область расположена в зоне пересечения Вандамского продольного разлома с Западно-Каспийским и поперечным Ахсуйским сдвигами, что дополнительно характеризует высокую сейсмическую активность и глубокое проникновение Западно-Каспийского правостороннего ортогонального разлома. Таким образом, видно, что в плане эпицентров они стремятся к разломам фундамента и узлам их пересечения, т.е. главный толчок, произошедший 5 февраля 2019 г., показывает совпадение второй узловой плоскости NP2 с правосторонним Ахсуйским и Западно-Каспийским поперечным разломом, характеризующимися правосторонним сдвиговым типом смещения. Анализ ориентации осей сжатия показал ориентацию СВ-ЮЗ, а оси растяжения – ориентацию СЗ-ЮВ.

scholarly journals Clusty, the waveform-based network similarity clustering toolbox: concept and application to image complex faulting offshore Zakynthos (Greece)

2020 ◽  
Vol 224 (3) ◽  
pp. 2044-2059
Author(s):  
G M Petersen ◽  
P Niemz ◽  
S Cesca ◽  
V Mouslopoulou ◽  
G M Bocchini
Keyword(s):  
Main Shock ◽  
Moment Tensor ◽  
Tectonic Setting ◽  
Active Faults ◽  
Aftershock Sequence ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Large Magnitude ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Network Similarity ◽  
Waveform Similarity

SUMMARY Clusty is a new open source toolbox dedicated to earthquake clustering based on waveforms recorded across a network of seismic stations. Its main application is the study of active faults and the detection and characterization of faults and fault networks. By using a density-based clustering approach, earthquakes pertaining to a common fault can be recognized even over long fault segments, and the first-order geometry and extent of active faults can be inferred. Clusty implements multiple techniques to compute a waveform based network similarity from maximum cross-correlation coefficients at multiple stations. The clustering procedure is designed to be transparent and parameters can be easily tuned. It is supported by a number of analysis visualization tools which help to assess the homogeneity within each cluster and the differences among distinct clusters. The toolbox returns graphical representations of the results. A list of representative events and stacked waveforms facilitate further analyses like moment tensor inversion. Results obtained in various frequency bands can be combined to account for large magnitude ranges. Thanks to the simple configuration, the toolbox is easily adaptable to new data sets and to large magnitude ranges. To show the potential of our new toolbox, we apply Clusty to the aftershock sequence of the Mw 6.9 25 October 2018 Zakynthos (Greece) Earthquake. Thanks to the complex tectonic setting at the western termination of the Hellenic Subduction System where multiple faults and faulting styles operate simultaneously, the Zakynthos data set provides an ideal case-study for our clustering analysis toolbox. Our results support the activation of several faults and provide insight into the geometry of faults or fault segments. We identify two large thrust faulting clusters in the vicinity of the main shock and multiple strike-slip clusters to the east, west and south of these clusters. Despite its location within the largest thrust cluster, the main shock does not show a high waveform similarity to any of the clusters. This is consistent with the results of other studies suggesting a complex failure mechanism for the main shock. We propose the existence of conjugated strike-slip faults in the south of the study area. Our waveform similarity based clustering toolbox is able to reveal distinct event clusters which cannot be discriminated based on locations and/or timing only. Additionally, the clustering results allows distinction between fault and auxiliary planes of focal mechanisms and to associate them to known active faults.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document