Body-Wave Magnitude mb Is a Good Proxy of Moment Magnitude Mw for Small Earthquakes (mb<4.5-5.0)

2013 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 932-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Gasperini ◽  
B. Lolli ◽  
G. Vannucci
Keyword(s):  
Body Wave ◽  
Moment Magnitude ◽  
Good Proxy ◽  
Body Wave Magnitude

scholarly journals Konversi Empiris Summary Magnitude, Local Magnitude, Body-Wave Magnitude, Surface Magnitude, dan Moment Magnitude Menggunakan Data Gempabumi 1922-2020 di Nusa Tenggara Barat

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Rian Mahendra Taruna ◽  
Anggitya Pratiwi
Keyword(s):  
Body Wave ◽  
Empirical Relation ◽  
Moment Magnitude ◽  
Local Magnitude ◽  
Earthquake Catalogues ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Good Relation ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Earthquake Process ◽  
Body Wave Magnitude

The existence of magnitude type variation from existing earthquake catalogue sources show that uniforming process is necessary. Beside that these type of magnitude will saturates in certain value, which are different with moment magnitude (Mw) which is not saturated and can describe earthquake process better. Our research initially did compatibility test between summary magnitude which is largely used by BMKG with other magnitude type. Furthermore, the purpose of our research is determination of empirical relation between magnitude type summary magnitude (M), local magnitude (ML), body-wave magnitude (mb), dan surface magnitude (Ms) which are usually used by earthquake catalogues to Mw. Method used in this research is linear regression using data set from BMKG, ISC-EHB, USGS, and Global CMT catalogues with are limited in West Nusa Tenggara and surrounding area. Data used in this research contains of 24.703 earthquake events during period May 9th 1922 until June 27th 2020. The result of this research shows there was good relation between M magnitude type with others magnitude type. Our research also found a conversion formula of M, ML, MLv, mb, and Ms to Mw with well-defined correlation.

The relationship between teleseismic body-wave magnitude m and local magnitude ML from New Zealand earthquakes

1972 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
S. J. Gibowicz
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Linear Relationship ◽  
Body Wave ◽  
Local Magnitude ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Shallow Focus ◽  
Body Wave Magnitude

Abstract Relationships between the magnitudes ML and m for 123 New Zealand earthquakes occurring between 1950 and 1967 and having 4.6 ≦ ML ≦ 7.3 have been found. Deep- and shallow-focus shocks were considered separately. There is a linear relationship between ML and m, the slope being the same for both deep and shallow events. Values of ML for deep events are consistently 0.5 magnitude larger than those for shallow events having the same value of m. The relationship between m and ML for New Zealand earthquakes differs significantly from that obtained by Gutenberg and Richter in California.

Integrated and frequency-band magnitude, two alternative measures of the size of an earthquake

1970 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 917-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. F. Howell ◽  
G. M. Lundquist ◽  
S. K. Yiu
Keyword(s):  
Transfer Function ◽  
Frequency Domain ◽  
Frequency Band ◽  
Transfer Functions ◽  
Body Wave ◽  
Average Amplitude ◽  
Equivalent Quantity ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Alternative Measures ◽  
Body Wave Magnitude

Abstract Integrated magnitude substitutes the r.m.s. average amplitude over a pre-selected interval for the peak amplitude in the conventional body-wave magnitude formula. Frequency-band magnitude uses an equivalent quantity in the frequency domain. Integrated magnitude exhibits less scatter than conventional body-wave magnitude for short-period seismograms. Frequency-band magnitude exhibits less scatter than body-wave magnitude or integrated magnitude for both long- and short-period seismograms. The scatter of frequency-band magnitude is probably due to real azimuthal effects, crustal-transfer-function variations, errors in compensation for seismograph response, microseismic moise and uncertainties in the compensation for attenuation with distance. To observe azimuthal variations clearly, the crustal-transfer functions and seismograph response need to be known more precisely than was the case in this experiment, because these two sources of scatter can be large enough to explain all of the observed variations.

Systematic difference in the ISC body-wave magnitude-seismic moment relationship between intermediate and deep earthquakes

1992 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 819-835
Author(s):  
Keiko Kuge
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Moment ◽  
Body Wave ◽  
Systematic Difference ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Local Structures ◽  
Dependent Relationship ◽  
Deep Earthquakes ◽  
Amplitude Data ◽  
Body Wave Magnitude ◽  
Distance Correction

Abstract There exists a systematic difference in the ISC body-wave magnitude (mbISC) - seismic moment (M0) relationship between intermediate and deep earthquakes around Japan. For earthquakes with the same M0, the mbISC for intermediate events is larger than that for deep events by 0.2 to 0.3 units. The mbISC discrepancy is attributed to the depth-distance correction in the procedure for determining the mbISC; a larger depth-distance correction (≈ 0.2) is made for the intermediate events than the deep events, irrespective of station distance. The discrepancy disappears if no depth-distance correction is made. I observe no depth-dependent relationship between the M0 and the JMA magnitudes (MJMA), which make a different depth-distance correction. No significant depth-dependent mbISC discrepancy appears in other regions; for example, around Tonga, I observe larger ISC P-wave amplitudes from deep events than intermediate events, which could cancel the effect of the depth-distance correction. The depth-dependent mbISC - M0 relationship around Japan is observed irrespective of whether the magnitudes are determined using the amplitude data at far or near stations, or whether stations are used in the dipping direction of the slab or not. The mbISC discrepancy for the same M0 cannot arise from local structures, radiation patterns, and station coverages. This is not attributable to the dataset of the M0 itself because no significant depth-dependent relationship between M0 and MJMA is observed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document