Ranking of Ground-Motion Models (GMMs) for Use in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis for Iran Based on an Independent Data Set

Author(s):  
Zoya Farajpour ◽  
Milad Kowsari ◽  
Shahram Pezeshk ◽  
Benedikt Halldorsson

ABSTRACT We apply three data-driven selection methods, log-likelihood (LLH), Euclidean distance-based ranking (EDR), and deviance information criterion (DIC), to objectively evaluate the predictive capability of 10 ground-motion models (GMMs) developed from Iranian and worldwide data sets against a new and independent Iranian strong-motion data set. The data set includes, for example, the 12 November 2017 Mw 7.3 Ezgaleh earthquake and the 25 November 2018 Mw 6.3 Sarpol-e Zahab earthquake and includes a total of 201 records from 29 recent events with moment magnitudes 4.5≤Mw≤7.3 with distances up to 275 km. The results of this study show that the prior sigma of the GMMs acts as the key measure used by the LLH and EDR methods in the ranking against the data set. In some cases, this leads to the resulting model bias being ignored. In contrast, the DIC method is free from such ambiguity as it uses the posterior sigma as the basis for the ranking. Thus, the DIC method offers a clear advantage of partially removing the ergodic assumption from the GMM selection process and allows a more objective representation of the expected ground motion at a specific site when the ground-motion recordings are homogeneously distributed in terms of magnitudes and distances. The ranking results thus show that the local models that were exclusively developed from Iranian strong motions perform better than GMMs from other regions for use in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis in Iran. Among the Next Generation Attenuation-West2 models, the GMMs by Boore et al. (2014) and Abrahamson et al. (2014) perform better. The GMMs proposed by Darzi et al. (2019) and Farajpour et al. (2019) fit the recorded data well at short periods (peak ground acceleration and pseudoacceleration spectra at T=0.2  s). However, at long periods, the models developed by Zafarani et al. (2018), Sedaghati and Pezeshk (2017), and Kale et al. (2015) are preferable.

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny Arroyo ◽  
Mario Ordaz

It is well understood that the range of application for an empirical ground-motion prediction model is constrained by the range of predictor variables covered in the data used in the analysis. However, in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA), the limits in the application of ground-motion prediction models (GMPMs) are often ignored, and the empirical relationships are extrapolated. In this paper, we show that this extrapolation leads to a quantifiable increment in the uncertainty of a GMPM when it is used to forecast a future value of a given intensity parameter. This increment, which is clearly of epistemic nature, depends on the adopted functional form, on the covariance matrix of the regression coefficients, on the used regression technique, and on the quality of the data set. In addition, through some examples using the database of the Next Generation of Ground-Motion Attenuation Models project and some currently favored functional forms we study the increment in the seismic hazard produced by the extrapolation of GMPMs.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahma Kusuma Dewi ◽  
Yusep Muslih Purwana ◽  
Raden Harya Dananjaya

<p>Indonesia merupakan salah satu negara dengan dengan tingkat intensitas kegempaan yang cukup tinggi, terlihat dari lokasinya yang berdekatan dengan sumber-sumber gempa diantaranya, zona subduksi, sesar (fault) yang aktif, dan cinicin api pasifik (gunung berapi) yang tersebar di sepanjang negara kepulauan ini. Diantara beberapa pulau di Indonesia, Pulau Jawa menjadi salah satu pulau dengan aktivitas seismik yang tinggi. Pulau dengan jumlah penduduk paling banyak, sebagai pusat pemerintahan dan kegiatan industri menjadikan Jawa mempunyai tingkat resiko kerusakan bangunan dan infrastruktur yang cukup tinggi. Salah satu bangunan yang mempunyai tingkat resiko tinggi adalah bendungan urugan. Penelitian ini akan mengevaluasi bahaya gempa pada salah satu bendungan besar Indonesia yaitu Bendungan Wadaslintang. Bendungan ini terletak di perbatasan 3 kabupaten besar yaitu Kabupaten Kebumen, Purworejo dan Wonosobo. Bendungan ini dibangun pada tahun 1982 sampai 1987, dengan tinggi 116 m. Mengingat usia bendungan yang mencapai 31 tahun serta potensi gempa yang cukup tinggi, maka perlu adanya evaluasi terbaru mengenagi resiko gempa di Bendungan Wadaslintang. Analisis ini menggunakan metode <em>Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis</em> (PSHA) dengan bantuan <em>software R-Crisis</em> 2018. Hasil analisis PSHA menunujukkan nilai percepatan tanah maksimum di lokasi tinjuan dengan periode ulang 500, 2.500, dan 10.000 tahun sebesar 0,22 g; 0,35 g dan 0,52 g. Hasil dari proses deagregasi menunjukkan besaran dan jarak gempa yang paling berpengaruh terhadap Bendungan Wadaslintang sebesar 6,87 – 7,13 Mw dan jarak 0-33 km. Hasil pencarian <em>ground motion, </em>didapatkan bahwa Gempa Irpinia, Italia (1980) mempunyai kriteria yang sama dengan lokasi tinjuan sesuai hasil deagregasi.  </p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document