Seismicity, Stress State, and Style of Faulting of the Ridgecrest-Coso Region from the 1930s to 2019: Seismotectonics of an Evolving Plate Boundary Segment

Author(s):  
Egill Hauksson ◽  
Lucile M. Jones

ABSTRACT Decadal scale variations in the seismicity rate in the Ridgecrest-Coso region, part of the Eastern California Shear Zone, included seismic quiescence from the 1930s to the early 1980s, followed by increased seismicity until the 2019 Mw 6.4 and 7.1 Ridgecrest sequence. This sequence exhibited complex rupture on almost orthogonal faults and triggered aftershocks over an area of ∼90  km long by ∼5–10  km wide, which is a fraction of the area of the previously seismically active Indian Wells Valley and Coso range region. During the last 40 yr, the seismicity has been predominantly the result of strike-slip motion, extending north from the Garlock fault, along the Little Lake and Airport Lake fault zones, and approaching the southernmost Owens Valley fault to the north. The Coso range forms an extensional stepover between these two strike-slip fault systems. This evolution of a plate boundary zone is driven by the northwestward motion of the Sierra Nevada, and crustal extension along the southwestern edge of the Basin and Range Province. Stress inversion of focal mechanisms shows that the postseismic stress state consists of almost horizontal σ1 and vertical σ2. The σ1 is spatially rotated across the Coso range stepover with σ1-trending ∼N17° E to the north, whereas, along the Mw 7.1 mainshock rupture, the trend is ∼N6° E. The friction angles as measured between fault strikes and the σ1 trends correspond to a frictional coefficient of 0.75, suggesting average fault strength. In comparison, the mature Garlock fault has a smaller frictional coefficient of 0.28, similar to weak faults like the San Andreas fault. Thus, it appears that the heterogeneously oriented and spatially distributed but strong Ridgecrest-Coso faults accommodate seismicity at seemingly random places and times within the region and are in the process of self-organizing to form a major throughgoing plate-boundary segment.

1980 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 1557-1572
Author(s):  
J. D. VanWormer ◽  
Alan S. Ryall

abstract Precise epicentral determinations based on local network recordings are compared with mapped faults and volcanic features in the western Great Basin. This region is structurally and seismically complex, and seismogenic processes vary within it. In the area north of the rupture zone of the 1872 Owens Valley earthquake, dispersed clusters of epicenters agree with a shatter zone of faults that extend the 1872 breaks to the north and northwest. An area of frequent earthquake swarms east of Mono Lake is characterized by northeast-striking faults and a crustal low-velocity zone; seismicity in this area appears to be related to volcanic processes that produced thick Pliocene basalt flows in the Adobe Hills and minor historic activity in Mono Lake. In the Garfield Hills between Walker Lake and the Excelsior Mountains, there is some clustering of epicenters along a north-trending zone that does not correlate with major Cenozoic structures. In an area west of Walker Lake, low seismicity supports a previous suggestion by Gilbert and Reynolds (1973) that deformation in that area has been primarily by folding and not by faulting. To the north, clusters of earthquakes are observed at both ends of a 70-km-long fault zone that forms the eastern boundary of the Sierra Nevada from Markleeville to Reno. Clusters of events also appear at both ends of the Dog Valley Fault in the Sierra west of Reno, and at Virginia City to the east. Fault-plane solutions for the belt in which major earthquakes have occurred in Nevada during the historic period (from Pleasant Valley in the north to the Excelsior Mountains on the California-Nevada Border) correspond to normaloblique slip and are similar to that found by Romney (1957) for the 1954 Fairview Peak shock. However, mechanisms of recent moderate earthquakes within the SNGBZ are related to right- or left-lateral slip, respectively, on nearly vertical, northwest-, or northeast-striking planes. These mechanisms are explained by a block faulting model of the SNGBZ in which the main fault segments trend north, have normal-oblique slip, and are offset or terminated by northwest-trending strike-slip faults. This is supported by the observation that seismicity during the period of observation has been concentrated at places where major faults terminate or intersect. Anomalous temporal variations, consisting of a general decrease in seismicity in the southern part of the SNGBZ from October 1977 to September 1978, followed by a burst of moderate earthquakes that has continued for more than 18 months, is suggestive of a pattern that several authors have identified as precursory to large earthquakes. The 1977 to 1979 variations are particularly noteworthy because they occurred over the entire SNGBZ, indicating a regional rather than local cause for the observed changes.


Author(s):  
Egill Hauksson ◽  
Brian Olson ◽  
Alex Grant ◽  
Jennifer R. Andrews ◽  
Angela I. Chung ◽  
...  

Abstract The 2020 Mw 5.8 Lone Pine earthquake, the largest earthquake on the Owens Valley fault zone, eastern California, since the nineteenth century, ruptured an extensional stepover in that fault. Owens Valley separates two normal-faulting regimes, the western margin of the Great basin and the eastern margin of the Sierra Nevada, forming a complex seismotectonic zone, and a possible nascent plate boundary. Foreshocks began on 22 June 2020; the largest Mw 4.7 foreshock occurred at ∼6  km depth, with primarily normal faulting, followed ∼40  hr later on 24 June 2020 by an Mw 5.8 mainshock at ∼7  km depth. The sequence caused overlapping ruptures across a ∼0.25  km2 area, extended to ∼4  km2, and culminated in an ∼25  km2 aftershock area. The mainshock was predominantly normal faulting, with a strike of 330° (north-northwest), dipping 60°–65° to the east-northeast. Comparison of background seismicity and 2020 Ridgecrest aftershock rates showed that this earthquake was not an aftershock of the Ridgecrest mainshock. The Mw–mB relationship and distribution of ground motions suggest typical rupture speeds. The aftershocks form a north-northwest-trending, north-northeast-dipping, 5 km long distribution, consistent with the rupture length estimated from analysis of regional waveform data. No surface rupture was reported along the 1872 scarps from the 2020 Mw 5.8 mainshock, although, the dipping rupture zone of the Mw 5.8 mainshock projects to the surface in the general area. The mainshock seismic energy triggered rockfalls at high elevations (>3.0  km) in the Sierra Nevada, at distances of 8–20 km, and liquefaction along the western edge of Owens Lake. Because there were ∼30% fewer aftershocks than for an average southern California sequence, the aftershock forecast probabilities were lower than expected. ShakeAlert, the earthquake early warning system, provided first warning within 9.9 s, as well as subsequent updates.


2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (11) ◽  
pp. 1416-1439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Le Pichon ◽  
A.M. Celâl Şengör ◽  
Julia Kende ◽  
Caner İmren ◽  
Pierre Henry ◽  
...  

We document the establishment of the Aegea–Anatolia/Eurasia plate boundary in Pliocene–Pleistocene time. Before 2 Ma, no localized plate boundary existed north of the Aegean portion of the Anatolia plate and the shear produced by the motion of Anatolia–Aegea with respect to Eurasia was distributed over the whole width of the Aegean – West Anatolian western portion. In 4.5 Ma, a shear zone comparable to the Gulf of Corinth was formed in the present Sea of Marmara. The initial extensional basins were cut by the strike-slip Main Marmara Fault system after 2.5 Ma. Shortly after, the plate boundary migrated west of the Sea of Marmara along the northern border of Aegea from the North Aegean Trough, to the Gulf of Corinth area and to the Kefalonia Fault. There, it finally linked with the northern tip of the Aegean subduction zone, completing the system of plate boundaries delimiting the Anatolia–Aegea plate. We have related the change in the distribution of shear from Miocene to Pliocene to the formation of a relatively undeforming Aegea block in Pliocene that forced the shear to be distributed over a narrow plate boundary to the north of it. We attribute the formation of this block to the northeastward progression of the oceanic Ionian slab. We propose that the slab cuts the overlying lithosphere from asthenospheric sources and induces a shortening environment over it.


During the course of this Discussion Meeting, a very large amount of regional tectonic geology was displayed, and debated critically in a terrane framework, on scales ranging from the whole of the North American Precambrian or the Mesozoic-Cenozoic Tethys down to particular segments of the Caledonides and Alpides. A wide spectrum of opinion was expressed from those who believe that the terrane methodology is a critical and essential objective stage in data handling before any rational palaeogeographic and palaeotectonic synthesis can be attempted in plate boundary zones to those who believe that the terrane philosophy is fundamentally flawed, dangerous, and pernicious, in that it leads to random data collection and the obscuring of fundamental plate tectonic processes. Another view was that terranology has been useful in drawing our attention to the importance of large pre-collisional strike—slip or transform motions in orogenic belts and the juxtaposition of disparate elements and zones. Yet another position was that there is nothing new in terranology that is not implicitly and explicitly inherent in plate boundary processes and that terrane analysis is simply another harmless word for what most careful regional geological synthesizers have been doing since the early 1970s. Naturally, no coherent consensus view emerged from the discussion, but an important result was that a huge amount of excellent regional and global geology and tectonic ideas were discussed in the context of the problems and complexities of plate boundary zone evolution and the mechanisms by which objects from the size of ‘knockers’ to continents, detach, move and weld to form collages at all scales.


Solid Earth ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1313-1332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Angrand ◽  
Frédéric Mouthereau ◽  
Emmanuel Masini ◽  
Riccardo Asti

Abstract. The western European kinematic evolution results from the opening of the western Neotethys and the Atlantic oceans since the late Paleozoic and the Mesozoic. Geological evidence shows that the Iberian domain recorded the propagation of these two oceanic systems well and is therefore a key to significantly advancing our understanding of the regional plate reconstructions. The late-Permian–Triassic Iberian rift basins have accommodated extension, but this tectonic stage is often neglected in most plate kinematic models, leading to the overestimation of the movements between Iberia and Europe during the subsequent Mesozoic (Early Cretaceous) rift phase. By compiling existing seismic profiles and geological constraints along the North Atlantic margins, including well data over Iberia, as well as recently published kinematic and paleogeographic reconstructions, we propose a coherent kinematic model of Iberia that accounts for both the Neotethyan and Atlantic evolutions. Our model shows that the Europe–Iberia plate boundary was a domain of distributed and oblique extension made of two rift systems in the Pyrenees and in the Iberian intra-continental basins. It differs from standard models that consider left-lateral strike-slip movement localized only in the northern Pyrenees in introducing a significant strike-slip movement south of the Ebro block. At a larger scale it emphasizes the role played by the late-Permian–Triassic rift and magmatism, as well as strike-slip faulting in the evolution of the western Neotethys Ocean and their control on the development of the Atlantic rift.


Geology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 602-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard O. Lease ◽  
Peter J. Haeussler ◽  
Robert C. Witter ◽  
Daniel F. Stockli ◽  
Adrian M. Bender ◽  
...  

Abstract The Fairweather fault (southeastern Alaska, USA) is Earth’s fastest-slipping intracontinental strike-slip fault, but its long-term role in localizing Yakutat–(Pacific–)North America plate motion is poorly constrained. This plate boundary fault transitions northward from pure strike slip to transpression where it comes onshore and undergoes a <25°, 30-km-long restraining double bend. To the east, apatite (U-Th)/He (AHe) ages indicate that North America exhumation rates increase stepwise from ∼0.7 to 1.7 km/m.y. across the bend. In contrast, to the west, AHe age-depth data indicate that extremely rapid 5–10 km/m.y. Yakutat exhumation rates are localized within the bend. Further northwest, Yakutat AHe and zircon (U-Th)/He (ZHe) ages gradually increase from 0.3 to 2.6 Ma over 150 km and depict an interval of extremely rapid >6–8 km/m.y. exhumation rates that increases in age away from the bend. We interpret this migration of rapid, transient exhumation to reflect prolonged advection of the Cenozoic–Cretaceous sedimentary cover of the eastern Yakutat microplate through a stationary restraining bend along the edge of the North America plate. Yakutat cooling ages imply a long-term strike-slip rate (54 ± 6 km/m.y.) that mimics the millennial (53 ± 5 m/k.y.) and decadal (46 mm/yr) rates. Fairweather fault slip can account for all Pacific–North America relative plate motion throughout Quaternary time and indicates stability of highly localized plate boundary strike slip on a single fault where extreme rock uplift rates are persistently localized within a restraining bend.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Angrand ◽  
Frédéric Mouthereau ◽  
Emmanuel Masini ◽  
Riccardo Asti

Abstract. The West European kinematic evolution results from the opening of the West Neotethys and the Atlantic oceans since the late Paleozoic and the Mesozoic. Geological evidence shows that the Iberian domain well preserved the propagation of these two rift systems and is therefore key to significantly advance our understanding of the regional plate reconstructions. The Late Permian-Triassic tectonic evolution of Iberian rift basins shows that they have accommodated significant extension, but this tectonic stage is often neglected in most plate kinematic models, leading to the overestimation of the movements between Iberia and Europe during the subsequent Mesozoic (Early Cretaceous) rift phase. By compiling existing seismic profiles and geological constraints along the North Atlantic margins, including well data over Iberia, as well as recently published kinematic and paleogeographic reconstructions we propose a coherent kinematics model of Iberia that considers both the Neotethyan and Atlantic evolutions. Our model shows that the Europe-Iberia plate boundary was a domain of distributed and oblique extension made of two rift systems, in the Pyrenees and in the Iberian intra-continental basins. It differs from standard models that consider left-lateral strike-slip movement localized only in the northern Pyrenees in introducing a significant strike-slip movement south of Ebro accounting for Late Permian-Triassic extension and by emphasizing the need for an Ebro microcontinent. At a larger scale it emphasizes the role played by the late Permian-Triassic rift and magmatism, as well as strike-slip faulting in the evolution of the western Neotethyan Ocean and their control on localization of the Atlantic rift.


1961 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 483-493
Author(s):  
Paul C. Bateman

Abstract Maps and photographs made by Willard D. Johnson in 1907 and published by W. H. Hobbs in 1910, together with unpublished illustrations and an incomplete manuscript by Johnson, show convincingly that the faulting that took place near the town of Lone Pine at the time of the Owens Valley earthquake of 1872 involved both dip-slip and right-lateral components of movement. The pattern of movement at Lone Pine in 1872 is opposed to the postulate of regionally systematic left-lateral movement along the east side of the Sierra Nevada during the Cenozoic, but does not prove systematic regional right-lateral movement. Detailed geologic mapping is needed to fully describe the regional pattern of movement during the Cenozoic.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon Shuck ◽  
Harm Van Avendonk ◽  
Sean Gulick ◽  
Michael Gurnis ◽  
Rupert Sutherland ◽  
...  

<p>Critical ingredients and conditions necessary to initiate a new subduction zone are debated. General agreement is that subduction initiation likely takes advantage of previously weakened lithosphere and may prefer to nucleate along pre-existing plate boundaries. To evaluate how past tectonic regimes and lithospheric structures might facilitate underthrusting and lead to self-sustaining subduction, we present an analysis of the Puysegur Margin, a young subduction zone with a rapidly evolving tectonic history.</p><p> </p><p>The Puysegur Margin, south of New Zealand, currently accommodates convergence between the Australian and Pacific plates, exhibits an active seismic Benioff zone, a deep ocean trench, and young adakitic volcanism on the overriding plate. Tectonic plate reconstructions show that the margin experienced a complicated transformation from rifting to seafloor spreading, to strike-slip motion, and most recently to incipient subduction, all in the last ~45 million years. Details of this tectonic record remained incomplete due to the lack of high-quality seismic data throughout much of the margin.</p><p> </p><p>Here we present seismic images from the South Island Subduction Initiation Experiment (SISIE) which surveyed the Puysegur region February-March, 2018. SISIE acquired 1252 km of deep-penetrating multichannel seismic (MCS) data on 7 transects, including 2 regional dip lines coincident with Ocean Bottom Seismometers (OBS) deployments which extend (west to east) from the incoming Australian plate, across the Puysegur Trench and Puysegur Ridge, over the Solander Basin and onto the continental Campbell Plateau margin.</p><p> </p><p>We integrate pre-stack depth migrated MCS profiles with OBS tomography models to constrain the tectonic development of the Puysegur Margin. Based on our results we propose the following Cenozoic evolution: (1) The entire Solander Basin contains thinned continental crust which formed from orthogonal stretching between the Campbell and Challenger plateaus during the Eocene-Oligocene. This phase of rifting was more pronounced to the south, producing thinner crust with abundant syn-rift volcanism across a wider rift-basin, in contrast to the relatively thicker crust, moderate syn-rift volcanism and narrower rift basin in the north. (2) Strike-slip deformation subsequently developed along Puysegur Ridge, west of the locus of rifting and within relatively unstretched continental lithosphere. This young strike-slip plate boundary translated unstretched crust northward causing an oblique continent-collision zone, which led to a transpressional pattern of distributed left-stepping, right-lateral faults. (3) Subduction initiation was aided by large density contrasts as oceanic lithosphere translated from the south was forcibly underthrust beneath the continent-collision zone. Early development of oblique subduction generated modest and widespread reactivation of faults in the upper plate. (4) Present-day, the Puysegur Trench shows a spatiotemporal transition from nearly mature subduction in the north to a recently initiated stage along the southernmost margin, requiring a southward propagation of subduction through time.</p><p> </p><p>Our new seismic images suggest subduction initiation at the Puysegur Margin was assisted by inherited buoyancy contrasts and structural weaknesses that were imprinted into the lithosphere during earlier phases of continental rifting and strike-slip along the developing plate boundary. The Puysegur Margin demonstrates that forced nucleation along a strike-slip boundary is a viable subduction initiation model and should be considered throughout Earth’s history.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document