A Regional Sn Magnitude Scale mb(Sn) and Estimates of Moment Magnitude for Earthquakes along the Northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge

2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (6) ◽  
pp. 3158-3173
Author(s):  
Won-Young Kim ◽  
Lars Ottemöller ◽  
Paul G. Richards
Keyword(s):  
Body Wave ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Moment Magnitude ◽  
Magnitude Scale ◽  
Transform Faults ◽  
Midocean Ridges ◽  
Least Squares Fit ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Mid Atlantic Ridge ◽  
Northern Atlantic

ABSTRACT We present a regional short-period Sn magnitude scale mb(Sn) for small earthquakes along the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Surface-wave magnitudes, teleseismic body-wave magnitudes, and seismic moments cannot be reliably determined for small earthquakes along this and other midocean ridges. Local magnitudes that rely on Lg waves are likewise not generally useful due to the substantial oceanic paths for earthquakes along midocean ridges. In contrast, Pn and Sn arrivals for earthquakes along the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge are generally well recorded by the existing seismographic networks, and, in fact, Sn arrivals are larger than Pn arrivals for about one-third of the ridge events. For this reason, we have developed a new regional Sn magnitude scale that is tied to Mw, so that seismic moments can be readily approximated. In our least-squares fit of peak amplitudes from 120 earthquakes having a published moment magnitude, we solved for the attenuation curve for paths in the oceanic mantle lid, for event magnitude adjustments (EMAs) to account for differences between long-period moment magnitude Mw and short-period Sn magnitude, and for station corrections. We find regional EMAs that are well correlated with the style of faulting: they are positive for normal-faulting earthquakes along spreading ridges and negative for strike-slip earthquakes along transform faults. These source-specific EMAs are approximately +0.11 magnitude units for normal-fault earthquakes and −0.26 magnitude units for strike-slip earthquakes on transform faults, and are consistent with previously reported apparent stresses from these regions. The amplitude distance curve determined for Sn for the northern Atlantic Ocean is similar to that determined for Pn in the northern Atlantic out to a distance of about 500 km, but at larger distances is more similar to the western U.S. Pn curve, likely reflective of the warmer temperatures at greater upper-mantle depths.

The analog seismogram archives of Iceland: Scanning and preservation for future research

JOKULL ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. 57-72
Author(s):  
Páll Einarsson ◽  
Sigurður Jakobsson
Keyword(s):  
Body Wave ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Short Period ◽  
The Sixties ◽  
History Of ◽  
Mid Atlantic Ridge ◽  
Tjörnes Fracture Zone ◽  
Adjacent Segments ◽  
Earthquake Sequences

The history of seismography in Iceland began in 1909 with the installation of one horizontal Mainka seismograph in Reykjavík. Following a period of intermittent operation, regular operation was initiated in 1925 with the establishment of the Icelandic Meteorological Office. The number of stations increased gradually over the following decades, and in the sixties, four stations were in operation. The number of permanent stations proliferated following the Heimaey eruption in 1973 and during most of the eighties the number of stations was 40–50. The first digital seismograph stations were installed in 1990 and the analog seismic network was gradually replaced by digital stations over the next two decades. Between 1910 and 1920 the number of seismograms grew to an estimated 300,000. A four-year project to make this record collection accessible on the internet has been initiated and funded. So far around 175,000 seismograms have been scanned and the results are available and free for download on the open website seismis.hi.is. The seismograms are scanned with a resolution of 300 dpi and presented on the website as jpg-, and png-file. The high-resolution files are on the order of 4–8 Mb each. Digitization of the seismic traces has not been attempted since most of the seismograms are from short-period instruments and the waveforms are already lost. In addition to numerous teleseismic body-wave-phases, the record collection contains primary data from various tectonic and magmatic events in Iceland during the last century. This includes eruptions of Hekla in 1947, 1970, 1980–81, 1991 and 2000, Surtsey in 1963–1967, Heimaey in 1973, Askja in 1961, Grímsvötn in 1934, 1983, 1998, and 2004, Gjálp in 1996, rifting episode at Krafla in 1975–1984, persistent seismic activity of the Bárðarbunga and Katla volcanoes, numerous suspected subglacial magmatic events, earthquake swarms on the Reykjanes Peninsula Oblique Rift and within the Tjörnes Fracture Zone, and earthquake sequences in the transform zones of South and North Iceland and adjacent segments of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.

The 4 December 2015 Mw 7.1 Normal-Faulting Antarctic Plate Earthquake and Its Seismotectonic Implications

2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (3) ◽  
pp. 1090-1100
Author(s):  
Ronia Andrews ◽  
Kusala Rajendran ◽  
N. Purnachandra Rao
Keyword(s):  
Body Wave ◽  
Focal Depth ◽  
Normal Fault ◽  
Normal Faults ◽  
Oceanic Plate ◽  
Normal Faulting ◽  
Transform Faults ◽  
Wave Inversion ◽  
Spreading Ridges ◽  
Southeast Indian Ridge

ABSTRACT Oceanic plate seismicity is generally dominated by normal and strike-slip faulting associated with active spreading ridges and transform faults. Fossil structural fabrics inherited from spreading ridges also host earthquakes. The Indian Oceanic plate, considered quite active seismically, has hosted earthquakes both on its active and fossil fault systems. The 4 December 2015 Mw 7.1 normal-faulting earthquake, located ∼700  km south of the southeast Indian ridge in the southern Indian Ocean, is a rarity due to its location away from the ridge, lack of association with any mapped faults and its focal depth close to the 800°C isotherm. We present results of teleseismic body-wave inversion that suggest that the earthquake occurred on a north-northwest–south-southeast-striking normal fault at a depth of 34 km. The rupture propagated at 2.7  km/s with compact slip over an area of 48×48  km2 around the hypocenter. Our analysis of the background tectonics suggests that our chosen fault plane is in the same direction as the mapped normal faults on the eastern flanks of the Kerguelen plateau. We propose that these buried normal faults, possibly the relics of the ancient rifting might have been reactivated, leading to the 2015 midplate earthquake.

A teleseismic body-wave analysis of the May 1980 Mammoth Lakes, California, earthquakes

1983 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 419-434
Author(s):  
Jeffery S. Barker ◽  
Charles A. Langston
Keyword(s):  
Body Wave ◽  
Moment Tensor ◽  
Normal Fault ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Body Waves ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Moment Tensors ◽  
Double Couple ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Mammoth Lakes

abstract Teleseismic P-wave first motions for the M ≧ 6 earthquakes near Mammoth Lakes, California, are inconsistent with the vertical strike-slip mechanisms determined from local and regional P-wave first motions. Combining these data sets allows three possible mechanisms: a north-striking, east-dipping strike-slip fault; a NE-striking oblique fault; and a NNW-striking normal fault. Inversion of long-period teleseismic P and SH waves for the events of 25 May 1980 (1633 UTC) and 27 May 1980 (1450 UTC) yields moment tensors with large non-double-couple components. The moment tensor for the first event may be decomposed into a major double couple with strike = 18°, dip = 61°, and rake = −15°, and a minor double couple with strike = 303°, dip = 43°, and rake = 224°. A similar decomposition for the last event yields strike = 25°, dip = 65°, rake = −6°, and strike = 312°, dip = 37°, and rake = 232°. Although the inversions were performed on only a few teleseismic body waves, the radiation patterns of the moment tensors are consistent with most of the P-wave first motion polarities at local, regional, and teleseismic distances. The stress axes inferred from the moment tensors are consistent with N65°E extension determined by geodetic measurements by Savage et al. (1981). Seismic moments computed from the moment tensors are 1.87 × 1025 dyne-cm for the 25 May 1980 (1633 UTC) event and 1.03 × 1025 dyne-cm for the 27 May 1980 (1450 UTC) event. The non-double-couple aspect of the moment tensors and the inability to obtain a convergent solution for the 25 May 1980 (1944 UTC) event may indicate that the assumptions of a point source and plane-layered structure implicit in the moment tensor inversion are not entirely valid for the Mammoth Lakes earthquakes.

Short-period Lg magnitudes: Instrument, attenuation, and source effects

1983 ◽  
Vol 73 (6A) ◽  
pp. 1835-1850
Author(s):  
Robert B. Herrmann ◽  
Andrzej Kijko
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Epicentral Distance ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Magnitude Scale ◽  
Source Effects ◽  
Anelastic Attenuation ◽  
Basic Conclusion ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Central United States ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract The applicaton of the Nutli (1973) definition of the mbLg magnitude to instruments and wave periods other than the short-period WWSSN seismograph is examined. The basic conclusion is that the Nuttli (1973) definition is applicable to a wider range of seismic instruments if the log10(A/T) term is replaced by log10A. For consistency and precision, the notation mbLg should be applied only to magnitudes based upon 1.0 Hz observations. The mbLg magnitude definition was constrained to be consistent with teleseismic P-wave mb estimates from four Central United States earthquakes. In general, for measurements made at a frequency f, the notation mLg(f) should be used, where m L g ( f ) = 2.94 + 0.833 log ⁡ 10 ( r / 10 ) + 0.4342 γ r + log ⁡ 10 A , and r is the epicentral distance in kilometers, γ is the coefficient of anelastic attenuation, and A is the reduced ground amplitude in microns. Given its stability when estimated from different instruments, the mLg(f) magnitude is an optimum choice for an easily applied, standard magnitude scale for use in regional seismic studies.

On moment-magnitude scale

1980 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 379-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Singh ◽  
J. Havskov
Keyword(s):  
Moment Magnitude ◽  
Magnitude Scale

Integrated and frequency-band magnitude, two alternative measures of the size of an earthquake

1970 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 917-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. F. Howell ◽  
G. M. Lundquist ◽  
S. K. Yiu
Keyword(s):  
Transfer Function ◽  
Frequency Domain ◽  
Frequency Band ◽  
Transfer Functions ◽  
Body Wave ◽  
Average Amplitude ◽  
Equivalent Quantity ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Alternative Measures ◽  
Body Wave Magnitude

Abstract Integrated magnitude substitutes the r.m.s. average amplitude over a pre-selected interval for the peak amplitude in the conventional body-wave magnitude formula. Frequency-band magnitude uses an equivalent quantity in the frequency domain. Integrated magnitude exhibits less scatter than conventional body-wave magnitude for short-period seismograms. Frequency-band magnitude exhibits less scatter than body-wave magnitude or integrated magnitude for both long- and short-period seismograms. The scatter of frequency-band magnitude is probably due to real azimuthal effects, crustal-transfer-function variations, errors in compensation for seismograph response, microseismic moise and uncertainties in the compensation for attenuation with distance. To observe azimuthal variations clearly, the crustal-transfer functions and seismograph response need to be known more precisely than was the case in this experiment, because these two sources of scatter can be large enough to explain all of the observed variations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document