scholarly journals Seismic Characteristics of the Nootka Fault Zone: Results from the Seafloor Earthquake Array Japan–Canada Cascadia Experiment (SeaJade)

2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (6) ◽  
pp. 2252-2276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Hutchinson ◽  
Honn Kao ◽  
George Spence ◽  
Koichiro Obana ◽  
Kelin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level ◽  
Fault Zone ◽  
Cascadia Subduction Zone ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Deformation Front ◽  
Thrust Faulting ◽  
Modes Of Failure ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismometers ◽  
Thrust Zone ◽  
Depth Ranges

Abstract The Nootka fault zone (NFZ) divides the incoming Explorer and Juan de Fuca plates of the Cascadia subduction zone. Three months of seafloor monitoring using 33 ocean‐bottom seismometers off the west coast of Vancouver Island has allowed us to better understand the tectonic configuration and seismogenic characteristics of the NFZ. We have learned that the NFZ is comprised of northern and southern primary bounding faults, and several conjugate faults developed subperpendicular to the primary faults. Earthquakes typically occur over the depth ranges of 15–20 and 6–15 km along the primary bounding and conjugate faults, respectively. Focal mechanisms reveal that the most common modes of failure in this region are left‐lateral strike slip, with normal faulting occurring along the southwestern extent of the NFZ and thrust faulting to the northeast before the subduction front. Seismic tomography suggests that the oceanic Moho is at a depth of 12–14 km below sea level (10–12 km below seafloor) just seaward of the Cascadia deformation front, and that it deepens to 19 km (17 km below seafloor) approximately 20 km landward of the deformation front. Converted phase analysis illuminates four velocity‐contrasting interfaces with average depths below sea level deepening landward of the subduction front at ∼4–6, ∼6–9, ∼11–14, and ∼14–18  km. We interpret them as the sedimentary basement, upper–lower crust boundary, oceanic Moho, and the base of the highly fractured and seawater or mineral enriched veins within mantle. The precipitation of minerals such as quartz or the formation of talc, which is made possible by the intense degree of fracturing within the NFZ facilitating the infiltration of seawater, may reduce mantle velocities, as well as VP/VS ratios. The lack of seismicity observed along the interplate thrust zone in northern Cascadia may suggest that the megathrust fault is completely locked, consistent with prior studies.

Queen Charlotte fault zone: microearthquakes from a temporary array of land stations and ocean bottom seismographs

1981 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 776-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Hyndman ◽  
R. M. Ellis
Keyword(s):  
Fault Zone ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Small Component ◽  
Queen Charlotte Islands ◽  
The North ◽  
Vertical Fault ◽  
Linear Sections ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismographs ◽  
Steep Slopes

A temporary array of land and ocean bottom seismograph stations was used to accurately locate microearthquakes on the Queen Charlotte fault zone, which occurs along the continental margin of western Canada. The continental slope has two steep linear sections separated by a 25 km wide irregular terrace at a depth of 2 km. Eleven events were located with magnitudes from 0.5 to 2.0, 10 of them beneath the landward one of the two steep slopes, some 5 km off the coast of the southern Queen Charlotte Islands. No events were located beneath the seaward and deeper steep slope. The depths of seven of these events were constrained by the data to between 9 and 21 km with most near 20 km. The earthquake and other geophysical data are consistent with a near vertical fault zone having mainly strike-slip motion. A model including a small component of underthrusting in addition to strike-slip faulting is suggested to account for the some 15° difference between the relative motion of the North America and Pacific plates from plate tectonic models and the strike of the margin. One event was located about 50 km inland of the main active zone and probably occurred on the Sandspit fault. The rate of seismicity on the Queen Charlotte fault zone during the period of the survey was similar to that predicted by the recurrence relation for the region from the long-term earthquake record.

scholarly journals Microearthquake seismicity and focal mechanisms at the Rodriguez Triple Junction in the Indian Ocean using ocean bottom seismometers

2001 ◽  
Vol 106 (B12) ◽  
pp. 30689-30699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kei Katsumata ◽  
Toshinori Sato ◽  
Junzo Kasahara ◽  
Naoshi Hirata ◽  
Ryota Hino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Indian Ocean ◽  
Triple Junction ◽  
Focal Mechanisms ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismometers ◽  
The Indian Ocean

Comparison of the S/N ratios of low-frequency hydrophones and geophones as a function of ocean depth

1981 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 1649-1659
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Brocher ◽  
Brian T. Iwatake ◽  
Joseph F. Gettrust ◽  
George H. Sutton ◽  
L. Neil Frazer
Keyword(s):  
Nova Scotia ◽  
Continental Margin ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Weather Conditions ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismometer ◽  
Scotian Shelf ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismometers ◽  
Particle Velocities ◽  
Refraction Data

abstract The pressures and particle velocities of sediment-borne signals were recorded over a 9-day period by an array of telemetered ocean-bottom seismometers positioned on the continental margin off Nova Scotia. The telemetered ocean-bottom seismometer packages, which appear to have been very well coupled to the sediments, contained three orthogonal geophones and a hydrophone. The bandwidth of all sensors was 1 to 30 Hz. Analysis of the refraction data shows that the vertical geophones have the best S/N ratio for the sediment-borne signals at all recording depths (67, 140, and 1301 m) and nearly all ranges. The S/N ratio increases with increasing sensor depth for equivalent weather conditions. Stoneley and Love waves detected on the Scotian shelf (67-m depth) are efficient modes for the propagation of noise.

scholarly journals The GITEWS ocean bottom sensor packages

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1759-1780
Author(s):  
O. Boebel ◽  
M. Busack ◽  
E. R. Flueh ◽  
V. Gouretski ◽  
H. Rohr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Warning System ◽  
Deep Ocean ◽  
Indian Ocean Tsunami ◽  
False Alarms ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Bottom Pressure ◽  
Tsunami Early Warning ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismometers ◽  
First Results ◽  
Sensor Package

Abstract. The German-Indonesian Tsunami Early Warning System (GITEWS) aims at reducing the risks posed by events such as the 26 December 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. To minimize the lead time for tsunami alerts, to avoid false alarms, and to accurately predict tsunami wave heights, real-time observations of ocean bottom pressure from the deep ocean are required. As part of the GITEWS infrastructure, the parallel development of two ocean bottom sensor packages, PACT (Pressure based Acoustically Coupled Tsunameter) and OBU (Ocean Bottom Unit), was initiated. The sensor package requirements included bidirectional acoustic links between the bottom sensor packages and the hosting surface buoys, which are moored nearby. Furthermore, compatibility between these sensor systems and the overall GITEWS data-flow structure and command hierarchy was mandatory. While PACT aims at providing highly reliable, long term bottom pressure data only, OBU is based on ocean bottom seismometers to concurrently record sea-floor motion, necessitating highest data rates. This paper presents the technical design of PACT, OBU and the HydroAcoustic Modem (HAM.node) which is used by both systems, along with first results from instrument deployments off Indonesia.

scholarly journals Minimal stratigraphic evidence for coseismic coastal subsidence during 2000 yr of megathrust earthquakes at the central Cascadia subduction zone

Geosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan R. Nelson ◽  
Andrea D. Hawkes ◽  
Yuki Sawai ◽  
Ben P. Horton ◽  
Rob C. Witter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transfer Function ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Function Analysis ◽  
Detection Threshold ◽  
Cascadia Subduction Zone ◽  
Tsunami Deposit ◽  
Diatom Assemblages ◽  
14C Dating ◽  
Megathrust Earthquakes ◽  
Transfer Function Analysis

Lithology and microfossil biostratigraphy beneath the marshes of a central Oregon estuary limit geophysical models of Cascadia megathrust rupture during successive earthquakes by ruling out >0.5 m of coseismic coastal subsidence for the past 2000 yr. Although the stratigraphy in cores and outcrops includes as many as 12 peat-mud contacts, like those commonly inferred to record sub­sidence during megathrust earthquakes, mapping, qualitative diatom analysis, foraminiferal transfer function analysis, and 14C dating of the contacts failed to confirm that any contacts formed through subsidence during great earthquakes. Based on the youngest peat-mud contact’s distinctness, >400 m distribution, ∼0.6 m depth, and overlying probable tsunami deposit, we attribute it to the great 1700 CE Cascadia earthquake and(or) its accompanying tsunami. Minimal changes in diatom assemblages from below the contact to above its probable tsunami deposit suggest that the lower of several foraminiferal transfer function reconstructions of coseismic subsidence across the contact (0.1–0.5 m) is most accurate. The more limited stratigraphic extent and minimal changes in lithology, foraminifera, and(or) diatom assemblages across the other 11 peat-mud contacts are insufficient to distinguish them from contacts formed through small, gradual, or localized changes in tide levels during river floods, storm surges, and gradual sea-level rise. Although no data preclude any contacts from being synchronous with a megathrust earthquake, the evidence is equally consistent with all contacts recording relative sea-level changes below the ∼0.5 m detection threshold for distinguishing coseismic from nonseismic changes.

Subduction zone heterogeneity observed across the magnitude spectrum for megathrust earthquakes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Bilek ◽  
Emily Morton
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Heterogeneity ◽  
Subduction Zone ◽  
Stress Drop ◽  
Subduction Zones ◽  
Cascadia Subduction Zone ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Small Earthquake ◽  
Megathrust Earthquakes ◽  
Seismic Slip ◽  
Subduction Zone Earthquakes

<p>Observations from recent great subduction zone earthquakes highlight the influence of spatial geologic heterogeneity on overall rupture characteristics, such as areas of high co-seismic slip, and resulting tsunami generation.  Defining the relevant spatial heterogeneity is thus important to understanding potential hazards associated with the megathrust. The more frequent, smaller magnitude earthquakes that commonly occur in subduction zones are often used to help delineate the spatial heterogeneity.  Here we provide an overview of several subduction zones, including Costa Rica, Mexico, and Cascadia, highlighting connections between the small earthquake source characteristics and rupture behavior of larger earthquakes.  Estimates of small earthquake locations and stress drop are presented in each location, utilizing data from coastal and/or ocean bottom seismic stations.  These seismicity characteristics are then compared with other geologic and geophysical parameters, such as upper and lower plate characteristics, geodetic locking, and asperity locations from past large earthquakes.  For example, in the Cascadia subduction zone, we find clusters of small earthquakes located in regions of previous seamount subduction, with variations in earthquake stress drop reflecting potentially disrupted upper plate material deformed as a seamount passed.  Other variations in earthquake location and stress drop can be correlated with observed geodetic locking variations. </p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document